If it wants a brand new Active-X control to be installed, the decision is to pass. I think that nobody should be asking anyone to install an Active-X control to print a coupon. I started couponpriter.exe sandboxed and got as far as the EULA where it states the keys will not be removed if you uninstall the coupon printer. I have no idea what their keys do. At this point I terminated the .exe with process explorer and cleared the sandbox. I wouldn't install this.
That being said, I've printed lots of coupons from sites without having to install any Active-X or other add-on crap, and would not do so at sites that require me to install stuff on my PC just to print a coupon.
It may well be tracking far more than you think, or expect.
In fact, there are several issues with TrustE's certification on this matter, and raises questions about the validity of their endorsements in general.
There is an excellent article by Ben Edelman regarding that "little download", that I highly recommend reading, very informative analysis. »www.benedelman.org/news/031808-1.html
Some of his issues are:
quote:•The Coupons.com "promo" promises that "The CouponPrinter does not gather or ask for any personal information about ... your computer." Yet my testing indicates that Coupons.com gathers detailed computer-specific information about each computer on which it is installed.
•Coupons.com's privacy policy similarly promises that "The Coupons, Inc. software ... only collect information about what coupons have been printed and redeemed from your computer" -- again, directly at odds with my observation that Coupons.com collects far more information.
•Coupons.com's license agreement discloses this information collection only by admitting that the "software uses anonymous, assigned numbers and/or anonymous information about your computer or device." But the numbers at issue are not anonymous: These numbers identify a specific individual user based on the user's unique and unvarying Windows CD key, motherboard serial number, and hard drive serial number. TRUSTe rule 1.qq defines such information to be pseudonymous ("information that may correspond to a person [such as] machine ID"), while rule 1.i defines anonymous information to exclude all pseudonymous information. Coupons.com thus errs in characterizing these numbers as "anonymous." Moreover, Coupons.com errs in disclosing this data collection practice only in its license agreement; because this practice speaks to user privacy, it belongs in Coupons.com's privacy policy.
Ben also addresses Coupons.com's DMCA litigation against John Stottlemire »www.tenbucks.net/
It's different when you are single. When you have a lot of mouths to feed, you make the time.MinisterofDOOM wrote: I have exactly fifty seven trillion better things to be doing with any given second of my day than screwing around with coupons.
nissangirl74 wrote:It's different when you are single. When you have a lot of mouths to feed, you make the time.MinisterofDOOM wrote: I have exactly fifty seven trillion better things to be doing with any given second of my day than screwing around with coupons.
Pretty much my take on them too, along with what Ray said.MinisterofDOOM wrote:Here's my take on coupons.
My time is worth money. My personal time goes for a particular premium. Coupons save in tiny increments. There is no way on Hell or Earth or anywhere else that spending time clipping coupons could EVER save me enough money to compensate for the time it cost me. I have exactly fifty seven trillion better things to be doing with any given second of my day than screwing around with coupons.