Lobo240sx wrote:The 300zx is a beautiful car, but you need some power like 500+hp to get that heavy pig moving. The 240 will be better in the power to weight category.
This coming from somebody with a 4 lug thread and trying to diss my 5 lugs lol. How am I sadly mistaken?? It happened already dude. Z32's are pigs period. You need over 450-500 to do anything with them. I noticed you cut out the other part of my comment.simmode1 wrote:Someone is sadly mistaken. I double dog dare you to go say that in the Z32 General board...
I don't need to go over to the Z32 forum because it already happened. Maybe one day you'll actually have a quick car and understand. Go back to your 4 lug thread.Stock Sr's running 15psi on a T25 walked away from a 300TT on 19psi lol.
You are right it won't happen all the time. 300zTT guys were talking trash and got owned all 3 of them by T25 stock Sr's lol. It was a fun night and they got put in their place big time. A road course is a whole other ball game. It isn't always the car, it's the driver that makes a world of difference.simmode1 wrote:What I'm saying is because you saw that particular situation doesn't mean it'll happen all the time. I, too, have seen N/A Z32 pushing SR'd 240's around on roadcourses.
The VG30DETT is beastly. I see no reason to have any other engine in a Z32.
Yeah, all I' trying to say is the Z32's potential gets overlooked alot. I'm fans of both cars and others as well, so I just try to put things in their proper perspective.Lobo240sx wrote:You build a VG30DETT the right way, it will move.
Yes as long as you dont drop a 6 cyl. into the 240!!deiivo wrote:but still more economical than the Z right?? i think
hahaha lol i was thinking the same thing! The z32 is a great power to weight ratio car, and is alot lighter than you think! Theres no way you need 500hp to get a z32 300zx up and going! Got a buddy with a 1990 slicktop Z32 TT! Is got 380whp and its a MONSTER!!!!!simmode1 wrote:Lobo240sx wrote:The 300zx is a beautiful car, but you need some power like 500+hp to get that heavy pig moving. The 240 will be better in the power to weight category.
Someone is sadly mistaken. I double dog dare you to go say that in the Z32 General board...
Ok, but that would be the VG30DE, not the TT! IF you said it was N/A^^^^simmode1 wrote:What I'm saying is because you saw that particular situation doesn't mean it'll happen all the time. I, too, have seen N/A Z32 pushing SR'd 240's around on roadcourses.
The VG30DETT is beastly. I see no reason to have any other engine in a Z32.
HOLY f***!! 18x10.5s ALL AROUND????? NO!!! You want it to move??? Do staggered 18x9s or 9.5s in the rear and 18x8s or 8.5s in the front!!simmode1 wrote:Yeah, all I' trying to say is the Z32's potential gets overlooked alot. I'm fans of both cars and others as well, so I just try to put things in their proper perspective.Lobo240sx wrote:You build a VG30DETT the right way, it will move.
Personally, If I ALREADY had a Z32... I wouldn't be so quick to downgrade to an S13. Hell, the fact that you already have 5 lug and Z32 brakes is argument enough. Hell, they can fit 265/35/18's up front under stock fenders!
All you really need to do is refine your drivetrain to reduce drivetrain loss and reduce your curb weight and de-clutter that engine bay. Then slam that ho on some Powertrix coilovers with 18x10.5 wheels all around. Done.
Nope. I meant what I said. Phuck that lame fitment. Z32's hate stagger.240sxAli4Life wrote: HOLY f***!! 18x10.5s ALL AROUND????? NO!!! You want it to move??? Do staggered 18x9s or 9.5s in the rear and 18x8s or 8.5s in the front!!




[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF4IN7-t_dg[/youtube]240sxAli4Life wrote:\
HOLY f***!! 18x10.5s ALL AROUND????? NO!!! You want it to move??? Do staggered 18x9s or 9.5s in the rear and 18x8s or 8.5s in the front!!

I didn't say the Z32 couldn't make any power, I said its still a pig (3200-3400lbs?) . Comparing a straight 6 and 4 cylinder is not where I was going with that. You want to build it right and last at 500-600hp. Don't even try to sugar coat it. 208whp for a straight 6 N/A is weak. My moms BONE STOCK Maxima put down 195whp and it is FWD.simmode1 wrote:Sometimes I look at the Z32 guys with envy. They already have 5 lug. They already have big brakes. They're already wide enough, they don't need any widebody kits.
Sometimes, us S-chassis guys like to throw names around to make ourselves feel better about our cars and call the Z32 fat or heavy. But realistically, It's not that heavy by todays sports car standards. At least if you have a paid off Z32, you don't have to worry about violating your warranty when you put it on a weight loss plan...
Oh and here's another reason I have Z32 envy. The TT is capable of over 500hp with stock internals. You don't need to do forged internals and other crazy sh*t to "Build" the motor to "make enough power to get it moving".
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hORu2FzEnI[/youtube]
This kind of power is achieved mostly with upgrades to support better airflow like better manifolds, intercooler piping and S15 turbos, etc etc etc...
Oh is that my queue?OutToWinPAHC wrote:Are we done yet?
The VG30DE is a V6, not straight 6. 208whp from a 3.0L V6 that was designed in back in the 80's actually is impressive. Find me another V6 of that vintage making more.Lobo240sx wrote: 208whp for a straight 6 N/A is weak. My moms BONE STOCK Maxima put down 195whp and it is FWD.WEAK!!
You want me to go get Edgar? I'll bring him in here. I have a Z32TT and a 2+2 N/A. I've driven KA's (SOHC & DOHC), KA-T's, and SR's for extended periods of time. Do I now hold credibility in your eyes?Lobo240sx wrote: Comparing cars you don't have is rice boy talk. You don't own a Sr or 300ZTT. You tube video of other people's rides don't impress me dude. Where is YOUR CAR!!