yes i belive the loss of torque was between 1k and 1.5k rpm'sbut even so its not a major loss / slightly noticable tho.4cefed wrote:Doesn't that decrease your torque in the low rpms? There must be threads on this.
This was literally the perfect response I was looking for. lolShabbernigdo wrote:
yes i belive the loss of torque was between 1k and 1.5k rpm'sbut even so its not a major loss / slightly noticable tho.
ive removed all my vacume lines other then the one that operates the fpr and just left the secondary butterflies open for the time being and have had no problems with it.
Does the increased top end make up for the marginal loss at such a low rpm?Shabbernigdo wrote:
yes i belive the loss of torque was between 1k and 1.5k rpm'sbut even so its not a major loss / slightly noticable tho.
ive removed all my vacume lines other then the one that operates the fpr and just left the secondary butterflies open for the time being and have had no problems with it.
no noticable top end gains from what i can tell but in the end with them disconnected its just one less place for a vacume leak and one less mechanical part to fail and give u problems down the road.4cefed wrote:
Does the increased top end make up for the marginal loss at such a low rpm?
sorry to go lil off topichow do u leave them open may i ask..and i was removing all emission shiz and found this bubble like mechinizum with a vacuum connected to it and bolted to the mani is that part of the butterflies? it was next to the egrShabbernigdo wrote:
ive removed all my vacume lines other then the one that operates the fpr and just left the secondary butterflies open for the time being and have had no problems with it.