You should have brought that to our attention. I didn't see any political ads yesterday.RobPaulson wrote:also want to point out that NICO had cynthia adds up all day yesterday, i know some of the subject matter is not really regulated by the people of NICO, but deng, its good to know that c*nt lost.
its about time both sides were equally represented.
I agree. First thing to do is fix the economy and get the US growing again. The only thing that will help end poverty is by growth and available jobs for US citizens.srellim234 wrote:Unfotunately this victory for the Republicans masks bigger issues that must be addressed.
One person, one vote no longer exists in the Senate. Each vote in the majoriy is only worth 6/10 of a minority vote.
Power is still limited to the two corrupt parties who through gerrymandering have ensured that there will never be competition. The people have allowed them to create a situation where the parties have a vested interest in keeping the two parties first, America second.
Brown may look good now, but I have very little faith that he won't be a corrupt politicin in the Sente in no time at all. He probably had to sell out to the party to even get the nomination let alone get elected.
Our political system stinks from top to bottom and it's not going to get fixed until true competition is restored.
i was thinking about it... but i didnt want to step on NICO toes by bashing the add policies or something like that... but ya, the top banner, on every nico page i refreshed/visited yesterday had 'vote for cynthia' with her stupid face and whats-his-face with his pompous little smirk.audtatious wrote:
You should have brought that to our attention. I didn't see any political ads yesterday.
Billy,Empty V wrote: Maybe, just maybe this healthcare bill will get rejected and we can all live in a free market.
Why not? It is a bill that could flatten our wallets and mess up our lives severely.UpStar wrote: I hope people voted for him for other reasons besides rejecting the health care bill. Shame on them if this is what they are expecting from him.
Sure, so would Brown be considered a failure in the eyes of the ones who voted for him if the bill gets passed? I guess what I’m saying is that it would be unfair to Brown if everyone thinks like you and Billy, especially if the bill goes through. Brown is talking the good talk now, but he will fall in line very soon if he want to survive the vicious game of politics. You are correct, I do not know what the people really want and neither do unless you’ve spoken to the 125,181,518 of them that voted in 2008….and you call me out of touch?!?! Don’t speak for the people; speak for your self next time.WDRacing wrote:Blocking a partisan health care bill is an excellent reason to vote for someone. The fact that you don't understand that makes it obvious that you're out of touch with what the people really want.
can YOU personally back that comment up and prove it without posting some link from someone saying so?dusred wrote:
Why not? It is a bill that could flatten our wallets and mess up our lives severely.
It's all but dead, Pelosi has already said they lack the house votes. It will NEVER happen now...as a Nation we have just won big time.UpStar wrote:
Sure, so would Brown be considered a failure in the eyes of the ones who voted for him if the bill gets passed? I guess what I’m saying is that it would be unfair to Brown if everyone thinks like you and Billy, especially if the bill goes through. Brown is talking the good talk now, but he will fall in line very soon if he want to survive the vicious game of politics. You are correct, I do not know what the people really want and neither do unless you’ve spoken to the 125,181,518 of them that voted in 2008….and you call me out of touch?!?! Don’t speak for the people; speak for your self next time.
Alex,UpStar wrote:
Billy,
Slow down! I’d like to see more balance myself, but 1 to 59 is no reason to start celebrating. I hope everyone that voted for him doesn't think like you. Please do not think that just because this guy got elected that the health bill will get rejected, but you did say "Maybe", right? I hope people voted for him for other reasons besides rejecting the health care bill. Shame on them if this is what they are expecting from him.
....and the talk of him running for prez is garbage.
Modified by UpStar at 6:26 AM 1/21/2010
Yes. I said it. Got a problem with that? Higher taxes = flatter wallet. National health care = rationing and overall poor health care.UpStar wrote:
can YOU personally back that comment up and prove it without posting some link from someone saying so?
Hopefully we didn't scare him away with reason, I think he was expecting conjecture.dusred wrote:
Yes. I said it. Got a problem with that? Higher taxes = flatter wallet. National health care = rationing and overall poor health care.