Yep, my adjustment is about 3 or 4% on mine, but it's a great tool overall. For instance, that blue low temperature light goes off at 129*F. There's so much other stuff it does that I love, and the MPG estimate per tank tends to be very close to correct. I highly recommend it!reyes1212 wrote:Yes I have the II, but I had to adjust the speed a bit. a 3% or so increase in order to get a better speed rating, cus it was saying 43 when the needle was clearly in the 45 spot.
YESSSS I LOVE IT AS WELLLLLI like to see the Intake temps, miles until empty, etc...great tooool!ericb2410 wrote:
Yep, my adjustment is about 3 or 4% on mine, but it's a great tool overall. For instance, that blue low temperature light goes off at 129*F. There's so much other stuff it does that I love, and the MPG estimate per tank tends to be very close to correct. I highly recommend it!
I was told by my co-worker (hypermiler) that it's not a good idea to turn off cars with CVT - something to do with lubrication. I do shift into neutral on long hills to decrease the RPM's.tyler_ofspain wrote:Ya i live in the mountains of colorado and I love to just get up to like 95 down a hill and just turn my car off... kinda works for gas millage ; )
In many areas this is illegal. Plus without the engine slowing you down the hill you have to use your brakes to check your speed. This could burn out the brakes long before normal use necessitating new brakes, thereby negating any minimal fuel saving you may have gained.jmaclean wrote:
I do shift into neutral on long hills to decrease the RPM's.
The installation could not be easier, just reach down and plug it in. The set up is just playing with buttons until you get it just how you want it and the only thing i had to adjust is the speed about 3 mph but it is one of the most user friendly devices i've used... highly recommendedcansecokid wrote:Tyler, was the set-up / installation fairly easy? Have you found the ScanGauge to be user friendly?
I'm not a very mechanical person and was wondering why putting the CVT in neutral cuts off lubrication. If I put the CVT in neutral, will it cause transmission problems and wear and be expensive to repair? I drive near some hills and would like to put the car in neutral to save on gas.jmaclean wrote:I was contemplating getting a scangauge for my V. Are you into hypermiling? What techniques do you employ to increase mileage -- shifting into 'N' on hills, etc? I have a friend who's a hypermiler and he turns his car off completely when gliding into his neighborhood and sometimes on the road. I've heard that that is not good for the CVT, as it cuts off lubrication. What-da-ya-know!!?
Putting the vehicle in Neutral is ok. If you re-read my entry it's TURNING THE CAR OFF and cruising in any gear that's not recommended according to my hyper-miler friend. I shift into neutral all the time and cruise there on hills, as long as I maintain a decent speed and I'm not impeding anyone behind me.cansecokid wrote:
I'm not a very mechanical person and was wondering why putting the CVT in neutral cuts off lubrication. If I put the CVT in neutral, will it cause transmission problems and wear and be expensive to repair? I drive near some hills and would like to put the car in neutral to save on gas.
Yeah, you really are aware of how fast everyone is going ABOVE THE SPEED LIMIT when you're trying to conserve on gas!! Have you been at a stop at an intersection and forgot that you were in neutral and "gunned it". I've done that a couple times. A little waste of fuel, but the bigger risk is that someone is going to rear-end you. I've changed my habit to coast down to lights when it's efficient, then shift back into Drive either before the light changes or as I slow down to the traffic light/ stop sign.cansecokid wrote:thanks jmac for that info. i'll be using neutral a lot more often. it's hard being a hypermiler when everyone around me gets angry at my "slow" (within speed limits) driving i guess we're all in a rush to get somewhere...
Not on a Versa with CVT. There's a difference but it ain't that dramatic.longo wrote: At that steady speed on cruise control the fuel use numbers are showing 45% better MPG's than at 70.
That 55 mph nonsense came into being while I was in Europe driving the Autobahn as fast as I could get that VW 411 to go. When I got back, I needed a 12 step program the minute I got on the highway. That was MY themesong.longo wrote: Remember the furor of the mandatory 55 mph speed limit that came out during the last gas disaster? If not that, then you might remember the popular C&W song, "I can't Drive 55"
I'll drive less, not slower. Compared to my youth, I'm barely moving as it is.longo wrote: Well, might be time to re-think that one, and write a new song
And they also quantified the reason NOT to slow down... 400 mile trip in 50 fewer minutes for only $6.19 (in the case of the camry). I'll pay that for almost an hour shorter trip.srellim234 wrote:Someone finally quantified the figure. Here's a CNNMoney.com article on how much gas you save by slowing down a little:
WOW! intersting item..the thing that has me all twisted is the fact that the Toyota Camry test car at 65 mph got 35 mpg!srellim234 wrote:Someone finally quantified the figure. Here's a CNNMoney.com article on how much gas you save by slowing down a little:
http://finance.yahoo.com/famil...f-Gas
I'll second that. Though I would say that it agitates me more than stresses me. I don't like staying behind the same car for very long (mostly cause very few people drive at a consistent speed.bikeman wrote:Driving slower than I oughta stresses me out.
David