The MB R-Class is a strong contender for Ugliest Car Ever Made.
I've never been fond of Mercedes Styling (or engineering, for that matter) but the R-Class is in a league of its own. I can't complain about the proportions because IT HAS NONE. It's a formless blob. With the worst adaptation of the already-terrible MB quad-round headlights of any car to date. There's almost nothing to its styling, yet it still manages to be offensive to the eyes. That MB designers managed to fail so hard with so little is astounding.
For its last couple years, MB gave it a facelift which they keep referring to as "more muscular." That's akin to claiming you're more muscular than Rosie O'Donnell. It looks less terrible because it doesn't look like a Mercedes Benz. In fact, it looks like a
10 year old Chrysler.

"Nice new Pacifica!"
"IT'S AN R CLASS!! MERCEDES BENZ!!! MY CAR MAKES ME IMPORTANT!!!!"
I'm not surprised the HS250H is failing to sell well. You can't just take a european econocar, stick a hybrid powertrain in it, change the badges, and expect it to sell under a North American Luxury brand. Lexus's strongest seller (the ES) has always been a baffling oddity in that it's just an average family car with goofy headlights and some L badges. Infiniti tried the same thing with the I and it didn't work out nearly so well. But where the G and M stole the I's sales right out from under it, the IS and GS just can't compete with the ES. Same didn't hold true for the HS, though...probably because NO ONE EVER WANTED A "PREMIUM HYBRID" IN THE FIRST PLACE. Especially not one that's about as premium as a Toyota Corolla.
Jesda wrote:Sales for non-Outback Mitsubishis are so slow that the loss of three models will hardly make a dent. The Outback Sport has been an unexpected hit for a brand that nearly disappeared from the US market. Like the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger, it sells because its a lot of car for little money.
Outlander?
Funny thing is, the first-gen Outlander always looked like an Outback Sport ripoff to me.
The problem with Mitu's take on "a lot of car for a little money" is that the ratio is no better than anyone else's, it's only the money that changes. But uninformed buyers want to save, so they buy the cheaper Mitsu. The early-model (for the US, anyway) Lancer is still the record holder for the Cheapest Feeling Car I have Ever Ridden In. Outside, inside, and underneath, it's heaping volumes of cheap@ss. It feels cheaper than the basest of base-model Neons OR Cavaliers. Quite a feat.
My favorite thing about Mitsu over the last decade or so is their love for gluing "V6" badges on cars. They remind me of Ford or Toyota of the 90s and early 2000s, bragging that their [insert class of car here] is the only one with a V6, while everyone else only offers fours. But the reality is the V6 Mitsu is so proud of offering is decades old and far inferior to the basic fours everyone else puts in their cars. The iron block 6G7 is a complete joke. Heavy, inefficient, gutless, and lacking any form of refinement. In 1992 it might have been impressive. That was twenty years ago.