Exactly!!!! Which is why I have one!driverdriver wrote:Its not like the last generation M45, which whenever I saw one had everybody gawking.
Sad, but true.SOCAL91Q45a wrote:OMG - they didnt!!!! Im saddened by this body change - its a gosh darn ALTIMA A$$ end for crying out loud. They must be friggen joking !!!
Couldn't be. Must have been a M35x = AWD.Trung1130 wrote:It was an M45X
Believe it or not, they just spent 65 million on advertizing for it. This is something they should have spent years ago.szhosain wrote:
Sad, but true.
I am also disappointed by the look of the new M45 (have said so here in the recent past too - maybe to the chagrin of a few folks who like it better than the 2003/04 M45!)
Z
So true, as does the handling, I am sure. A better (stiffer), if not prettier, platform.driverdriver wrote:Exterior wise, I prefer the old, but interior wise the new one wins hands down.
You gotta visit San Jose, CA sometime! I know, I know, it is a long drive from Florida! , but here is why!rsiwicki wrote:Too bad I can't find any M45's to race. All seem to be driven by more of the quiet type of people.
ROFLMAO!SIDVICIOUS wrote:IT'S SORT OF LIKE YOUR GIRLFRIEND GETTING A BREAST REDUCTION.
Yes, indeed! Couldn't agree more!SIDVICIOUS wrote:THE ONLY GOOD PART IS THAT MY 2003 M45 WILL REMAIN SPECIAL!