SAFC and BTM or E-Manage

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
KAT S14
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:39 pm

Post

What would be a better engine management to use on a daily driven 95' running around 7psi with a T3/T04 E .50 or.57 trim and a .63A/R : an SAFC with 550cc injectors and a BTM, or an E-manage with the injector and ignition harnesses, pressure sensor and support tool with 550cc injectors.


User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

I like the emanage.According to the Emanage FAQ at http://www.mohdparts.com/emanage/EmanageFAQ.txt you only need the emanage, support tool, and injection harness. (See section 4.) It suggests running with a MAF and upgrading only to the pressure sensor only if necessary.with the pressure sensor installed, you can adjust your maps based on boost. you wouldnt be able to do this with the SAFC/BTM combo.And for 7 psi, 370cc injectors should be sufficient.

User avatar
Checkered-Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:14 am
Car: 1998 Nissan Altima (modded)
2003 Audi A6 2.7T (stock)
Contact:

Post

BTM is a piece of junk everyone on here will tell you that, it will cause more problems then it will solve...

The E-manage + support tool + injector & ignition harness + pressure sensor = stand alone like control and flexibility at half the price….

User avatar
virus77
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:43 am
Car: 95 S14, 71 240z, 97 e320

Post

Yup I use the emanage it work like a champ. Just get the ignition harness only, which is the one that comes with the extra plug for the emanage, and use the extra wires from it in the original harness for injector control so you dont need the extra injector harness for $40

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

i have the safc and btm, i vote for the emanage

User avatar
Mishka
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 9:38 am

Post

I wanted to add another question(s).I'm puting together a very similar set up and I got to that point when I have to decide which fuel management tool to use. Which out of two (e-manage and S-AFC II) is easier to install and use.Thanks a lot.

User avatar
virus77
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:43 am
Car: 95 S14, 71 240z, 97 e320

Post

the basics of a emanage are nearly identical to a safc. if you add in the ignition harness, injector harness, external signall harness it gets a that much more complicated in wireing, but if you can do one you can do the other. That is if you understand wiring and readign simple schematics.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

Structure240sx wrote:i have the safc and btm, i vote for the emanage
That sealed my decision...

KAT S14
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:39 pm

Post

yep, i am definitely going e-manage.

User avatar
red240ne
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:02 pm
Car: mmm...donuts
Contact:

Post

BTM just destroyed my distributor...

User avatar
ShifDown96240SE
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 3:34 pm
Car: Drifting, racing, Reptiles,partying
Contact:

Post

what is BTM?? I was going to buy apexi, but now greddy sounds better, how much is emanage??

bruinbear714
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 9:58 pm
Contact:

Post

Emanage is like $400 if you get everything.

On a sidenote, I just discovered a hidden feature of emanage in that it can monitor injector pulsewidth and duty cycle!

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

btm = boost timing master. its an msd ignition system that retards timing when you hit boost

User avatar
ShifDown96240SE
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 3:34 pm
Car: Drifting, racing, Reptiles,partying
Contact:

Post

thanks, so basically emanage is the best piggy back, and MSD SCI ignition is the best ignition with some iridium plugs

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Is the emanage that much better than the BTM and SAFC? I mean I can see it is overall, but will it work that much better until you get the AEM standalone in a year or 2?

bruinbear714
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 9:58 pm
Contact:

Post

SHIEF wrote:Is the emanage that much better than the BTM and SAFC? I mean I can see it is overall, but will it work that much better until you get the AEM standalone in a year or 2?


IMO, the emanage is the best piggyback you can buy. Granted, it's $300 for the unit, $35 for the harnesses, and another $100 for the CD, you're paying a little over $400 for a unit that has a 16x16 fuel AND 16x16 ignition map. Furthermore, the points are user adjustable to any rpm/tps/maf voltage regions you want.

It can also use a pressure sensor if you max out the MAF, which I'll probably be using when my stock MAF maxes. For the extra $100, I think it's worth it. It's better than paying $100-$150 for a USED Z32 MAF.

Anyhow I'll let ya'll know how the emanage is after I install my turbo kit this weekend and play around with it on my laptop with a wideband.

driftjunke
Posts: 325
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 4:34 pm

Post

What's the biggest size injectors a E-manage can control, I was told by Greddy Tech's 405's the biggest I can use?

J.D.

User avatar
virus77
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:43 am
Car: 95 S14, 71 240z, 97 e320

Post

I will control more than that, thats BS. Ill let you know how it does on with 565cc this weekend. And if you are looking to have a electronic boost controller at some time, you can get the profec e-01 and use it with the emanage then you dont need the support tool, pressure sensor (since the E-01 takes care of it), its got nice features, together they work great.

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

bruinbear714 wrote:Emanage is like $400 if you get everything.

On a sidenote, I just discovered a hidden feature of emanage in that it can monitor injector pulsewidth and duty cycle!


You can actually monitor the MAF input and output signals from the E-Manage as well as timing signal adjustment, TPS signal and reference it to RPM. It can also datalog this on a laptop as well. It's certainly a nice feature but of course not enough to fully tune the system with. But it has helped me see what is going on a bit better. Like the fact that the MAF hits 5 volts at 6.5 psi before redline.

As far as injector sizing this has been discussed on the e-manage yahoogroups. I suggest anyone looking into one or that has one subscribes to the group. I am no longer on that list however as I no longer have my 240 or an e-manage. But their are some guys who really know this unit well and have some rather creative ideas. Back to the injector size. Greddy's specs indicate limit of 150% larger injectors. But then the understanding is they meant 50% larger or 150% of the original injecotr size. Hoever, many have tested this and the Greddy will compensate pretty much as much as you tell it to. The limitations come from the ability of the ECU to run such a small pulsewidth to idle with a large injector. Honestly, if you get to a point where this occurs, on any system, you likely have to go with additional injectors. Greddy has gone a step further and provided provisions for this already as well.

One thing I really like about the Greddy unit is it's ability to add it's own injector ground to keep the injectors open longer. So not only can it add fuel by altering the MAF signal, but it can add fuel by holding the injectors open directly. This can be significant in that the ECU will constantly be trying to adjust the pulsewidth so that the A/F is closer to the settings the factory provided. This can cause a lean condition under boost. Especially at part throttle moderate to high psi of boost. The E-Manage's ability to provide it's own injector ground essentially bypasses the ECU's injector ground and the ECU's own adjustements will not occur. While this is the theory behind it, I've never actually used it myself or seen wideband results with it so I am not sure how reliable or effective it is. I'd check with some that have used it on the yahoogroups. Interestingly, a copy of Greddy's RSX Turbo maps leaked through a unit that wasn't password protected from the factory and looking at that, Greddy chose to do a lot of their fuel adjustments using the additional fuel map as opposed to the altering the MAP signal.

User avatar
virus77
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:43 am
Car: 95 S14, 71 240z, 97 e320

Post

for sure using the injector control is the way im going to go, i wont touch the air flow maps if i dont have to. But my concern im having now is that when you put in bigger injectors and ask it to compensate, which it does so with the maf signal, how much timing is it going to advance on its own.

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

I never checked or had the equipment to check. With 6.5 psi on 91 octane fuel, I got some light detonation. I had backed off timing between 1-3 degrees at higher airflows and it seemed to do the trick.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Congrats on the G35 purchase C-Kwik...

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

Thanks! Wish I had the money to turbocharge it.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

You and me both, which is why I didn't bye the 350Z a few moths back. Cause I would have strapped myself trying to boost it.

Back on topic damnit...

AceInhole
Posts: 478
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 1:36 pm

Post

e-manage is only worth it if you get all the harnesses with it, and the link cable and software, and a laptop. It's more like 700 + laptop in the end.

i'm about to try the BTM myself. i've heard most of the problems people have had have been from faulty wiring, but guess time will tell.

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

well my motor hasnt blown yet at 13 psi. i hope my wiring is good but i still am kinda weary of it. im now thinking about gettin on a dyno with a timing light ready

bruinbear714
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 9:58 pm
Contact:

Post

AceInhole wrote:e-manage is only worth it if you get all the harnesses with it, and the link cable and software, and a laptop. It's more like 700 + laptop in the end.

i'm about to try the BTM myself. i've heard most of the problems people have had have been from faulty wiring, but guess time will tell.


It can be had for cheaper than that... the unit is under $300, the harness (you only need ignition, since it comes with enough wires to make the injector harness) is about $35, and the software is another $100 or so, grand total comes out to be about $450.

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

I'm going to go with the safc II and the btm, since I already have them. I agree that most problems are caused by people who don't know what they are doing.

superhoss37
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 5:21 pm

Post

I'm pretty sure mine is wired up wrong. If ANYONE can figure out exactly to wire this up to a 98 or similar distributor, please post exact instructions.

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

What's wrong with wiring it according to the instructiuon manual? That was all I had used and it ran perfectly.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”