S14 DE's compression in psi

Your premier source for information on the Turbo KA: KA24E-T and KA24DE-T (KA with aftermarket turbo kit)!
User avatar
red240ne
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:02 pm
Car: mmm...donuts
Contact:

Post

Are all KA24DE's stock compression 179psi in the cylinders? I was wondering because the salvage yard by me claims that they have 3 DE's from 95-98 240's with compression readings of 180, 185, and even 192??


User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

WHen doing a static compression test its important to make sure all the cylinders are within 5 psi of each other. As far as what the factory specs are, i'm not sure. You can always call Nissan for the info. I'll copy this to the Tech section.

WD

:: orion ::
Posts: 1483
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 4:40 pm
Car: '96 240SX, with KA-T @ 12psi...
Contact:

Post

IIRC, 179psi is the 'standard' reading...i.e.your engine is in just fine (normal) condition with 179psi.

Anything better, and that's great. I have a spare motor with 192 across the board.

Anything less, down to 155 is bad (but not horrible per se). You're looking at a rebuild with anything less than 155psi...

Later - Brian

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

from huguetpj's sitehttp://www.geocities.com/huguetpj/stats.htm

I think these are the factory specs...

Engine Compression in PSI

standard 179 @ 300rpmminimum 151 @ 300 rpmdifference limit between cylinders 14 @ 300rpm

Jay

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

yep I got that from 240sx.org, I believe it to be right.

User avatar
oi138
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 7:32 pm
Contact:

Post

:: orion :: wrote:IIRC, 179psi is the 'standard' reading...i.e.your engine is in just fine (normal) condition with 179psi.

Anything better, and that's great. I have a spare motor with 192 across the board.


Not necessarily. High compression readings can also be caused by bad rings or anything else that would let oil in the combustion chamber. Also carbon diposits will cause abnormally high compression readings. Leak down tests are a much better way of reading the engines conditions.

:: orion ::
Posts: 1483
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 4:40 pm
Car: '96 240SX, with KA-T @ 12psi...
Contact:

Post

oi138 wrote:High compression readings can also be caused by bad rings or anything else that would let oil in the combustion chamber. Also carbon diposits will cause abnormally high compression readings. Leak down tests are a much better way of reading the engines conditions.


That's true, but with respect to a compression test, 179 indicates 'normal' for a KA, and higher is *usually* better.

I've never seen worn rings cause a high reading...?

Leakdown tests are usually used as a followup to a compression test - If the motor is warmed up and a compression test is done correctly..and the results check out, you can skip a leakdown test - 99% of the time...

Later - Brian

User avatar
red240ne
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:02 pm
Car: mmm...donuts
Contact:

Post

Those aren't my readings. Those are readings from the salvage yard.

I meant that they have an engine with 180psi. They have another engine with 185psi. And they have another with 192psi.

3 different KA24DE's. Sorry I wasn't very specific.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

I think we understood that part Red, either way, all of the above engines are good.

WD

User avatar
red240ne
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:02 pm
Car: mmm...donuts
Contact:

Post

they want 350 bucks for each of them, which really isn't that bad for a salvage yard. all of them have under 90k miles as well.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

I'd buy all 3...

User avatar
oi138
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 7:32 pm
Contact:

Post

:: orion :: wrote:That's true, but with respect to a compression test, 179 indicates 'normal' for a KA, and higher is *usually* better.

I've never seen worn rings cause a high reading...?

Later - Brian


Oil in the combustion chamber will cause high readings. I can't really explain why but I have seen it before.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Well, I don't think it will cause higher then normal readings on a cylinder with very good rings, but on a cynder with bad rings or a bad piston pouring a small amount of oil in the spark plug hole and redoing the CR test will yeild higher CR. The oil simpl;y takes up some gaps between the ring/piston. I also use this method to determine if I have a bad valve or a bad cylinder. If the CR stays the same when you add oil, you have a valve/gasket problem.

WD

Smurf6x6
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 6:18 pm
Car: 93 CA18 Coupe

Post

Oil in the the combustion chamber takes up space, so the is less space for the air in the combustion chamber, therfore make the compression ratio higher.

mikesloud
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 6:29 am
Car: turbos and SPL world champ

Post

I have a rebuilt kadet with 3600 miles on it daily driver, I have all stiff etc,valvetrain and jim wolf cams, 8:5 to 1 ross pistons and I was worried about my comporession my readings ,maybe because of vaccum loss (cams,valve springs)of starter 300 rpm , my results were 139,140,140,141 and I was way worried, I called Ivan at SP Racing and he said don't worry about it as long as they were all close, I thought it may be to low , but it is new motor driving for 6 months 1200 miles no boost,1500 more with 5 lbs boost , now have 12psi I t pull great, drives great. should i be worried , how can I get compression higher?

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

old post you are bringing back.

klattr1 has similar compression number. around 155 in each with a motor very similar to yours. i think he figured it was the jwt cams that both of you have. no need to try to get better readings if everything is working great

crzycav86
Posts: 3836
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 1:28 pm
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX KAT

Post

Well, don't you think the lower compression ratio would effectively lower the compression of each cylinder?

KA guys with 11:1 CR have compression in the 200 something range..

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

I followed the FSM directions with the exception of removing distributor plug). It did take me awhile to perform the test after warming up the car cause I couldnt get the plugs out of the hole I got 190psi in all cylinders. Thats kinda high, but I think consistency is more important. I think the high numbers came from my flawed method.

With 8.5:1 pistons, you should expect lower numbers...

crzycav86
Posts: 3836
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 1:28 pm
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX KAT

Post

Nah. You would get lower numbers on a cold engine. You probably did it right anyway. How many miles do you have? You might have a little carbon buildup or something unimportant like that.

EXIST tm
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:29 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Coupe

Post

ok so i can tell you that high is 179 psi, standard is 155 with a +/- 12 psi, as from what alldata says about compression, i had to learn this because my engine fired at from 1 - 4, 105 psi, 165 psi, 117psi, 153 psi. that says it has bad rings, and to prove it, put some oil in the cylinder head and see if it brings all the piston up to the regular psi (wet test)

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

Its got 86k miles on it. I wondered if a cold motor would give me high or low readings. I couldnt come to a conclusion either way...


Return to “KA24ET / KA24DET Forum”