s13 faster than s14????STOCK

[i4jdm]

so i drove my buddies car yesterday and i could swear it feels faster than my s14. like a noticable difference. hes got a 93 coupe ...as far as i can tell its base model. even riding on steelies....and ive got a fully loaded 95 se, the only option i dont have is the one i dont know about...so ive lookin trough a few forums and the only difference i see in engines is i guess 13s have different cams...hmmmm

[OutToWinPAHC]

At then end of the day they are both old slow cars. Perhaps look up the info on the cars 0-60 1/4 times. They test almost every car at some point in stock form.

[locoluna825]

it probably felt fast er because that coupe ways like 800 pounds less than that s14 and they basically have the same engine

[Dire91]

it probably felt fast er because that coupe ways like 800 pounds less than that s14 and they basically have the same engine

/threadKey sentence: "My S14 is fully loaded"

[Dazzla]

As soon as you said SE I knew the answer to your question lol...SE = fatass with lots of weight

Unless you have a base model SE like me Lol

[ChampaignSilviaS14]

Almost positive the 95 S14 has the quickest time, but I can't remember for sure.

Edit:

1989 Nissan 240SX 8.8 16.51990 Nissan 240SX SE 8.8 16.51991 Nissan 240SX SE 7.9 16.11993 Nissan 240SX Convertible 9.6 17.31993 Nissan 240SX SE 8.4 16.31995 Nissan 240SX SE 8.0 15.8

Modified by ChampaignSilviaS14 at 5:03 PM 9/19/2009
Modified by ChampaignSilviaS14 at 5:04 PM 9/19/2009

[ectomorph]

Almost positive the 95 S14 has the quickest time, but I can't remember for sure.

Edit:

1989 Nissan 240SX 8.8 16.51990 Nissan 240SX SE 8.8 16.51991 Nissan 240SX SE 7.9 16.11993 Nissan 240SX Convertible 9.6 17.31993 Nissan 240SX SE 8.4 16.31995 Nissan 240SX SE 8.0 15.8

Modified by ChampaignSilviaS14 at 5:03 PM 9/19/2009

Modified by ChampaignSilviaS14 at 5:04 PM 9/19/2009

1989 = SOHC1991 = DOHC

SOHC is .4 seconds slower than a dual? and faster than a vert?....new info to me.

[ChampaignSilviaS14]

15 HP lower. Verts are freaking heavy.

[gnvarnadore]

Almost positive the 95 S14 has the quickest time, but I can't remember for sure.

Edit:

1989 Nissan 240SX 8.8 16.51990 Nissan 240SX SE 8.8 16.51991 Nissan 240SX SE 7.9 16.11993 Nissan 240SX Convertible 9.6 17.31993 Nissan 240SX SE 8.4 16.31995 Nissan 240SX SE 8.0 15.8

Modified by ChampaignSilviaS14 at 5:03 PM 9/19/2009

Modified by ChampaignSilviaS14 at 5:04 PM 9/19/2009

thats fine and all but what model s13 were they testing a coupe or hatchback? it seems logical that the ka24de s13 coupes would be the fastest because they weigh in the less but the data conflicts with that.

[i4jdm]

At then end of the day they are both old slow cars. Perhaps look up the info on the cars 0-60 1/4 times. They test almost every car at some point in stock form.

i know that they are slow f***in cars ...wasnt asking that bro.... lol...

[i4jdm]

here are some numbers i found...

Year Make & Model (0-60) (1/4 Mile) _____ _________________________________ ______ __________

1985 Nissan 200SX Turbo 9.5 16.91995 Nissan 200SX SE-R 8.2 16.4

1989 Nissan 240SX 8.8 16.51990 Nissan 240SX SE 8.8 16.51991 Nissan 240SX SE 7.9 16.11993 Nissan 240SX Convertible 9.6 17.31993 Nissan 240SX SE 8.4 16.31995 Nissan 240SX SE 8.3 16.11995 Nissan 240SX SE-R 8.0 15.8

240sx came in se-r models? are they testing usdm cars?

[simmode1]

We can sit here and compare 0-60 & quarter mile times from over a decade ago all day, but I'd bet the deciding factor was the condition of each car's motor.

I've driven a sohc hatch that was faster than my dohc hatch and both had the same trim level. In the end, I believe the sohc motor probably had better compression than mine, even though my motor had been recently rebuilt.

There's so many variables in this equation, looking to those old facts & figures for an answer is almost pointless...