Okay, my commute was only about 7-8 miles, so 50 cars out of the 250 or so total I'd see on the drive would be a lot.BusyBadger wrote:DC Metro is a pretty large area with a large population...
What's 50+ Hybrids in a confined space like that with a pop. density like that? My commute is 65 miles each way and I see fewer than 10 hybrids out of anywhere between 150 - 200 cars. Not that the comparison is a very good one, a metro commuter will see far more benefit from a hybrid than someone in my area would.
Anyway, my point - overall percentage of hybrids vs conventional and not a raw number is what really matters.
I'm still waiting for Doc Brown and the Mr. Fusion powered car.
I don't think hybrids are the answer either - people were lining up to get them because of the gas mileage, not because of the "enviro friendly" nature or what not...BusyBadger wrote:DC Metro is a pretty large area with a large population...
What's 50+ Hybrids in a confined space like that with a pop. density like that? My commute is 65 miles each way and I see fewer than 10 hybrids out of anywhere between 150 - 200 cars. Not that the comparison is a very good one, a metro commuter will see far more benefit from a hybrid than someone in my area would.
Anyway, my point - overall percentage of hybrids vs conventional and not a raw number is what really matters.
I'm still waiting for Doc Brown and the Mr. Fusion powered car.
Never.dusred wrote:How often to you listen to Rush, Hash?
That's interesting.dusred wrote:Is why he said that is because a few days earlier there were a few stories about Ford not being able to sell their Hybrids because fuel was so cheap and they were asking the Government to put a fuel tax that would float the fuel price at $4.00 a gallon so they could sell the hybrids or something like that.
Now that is a more important stat than hybrid ownership numbers!dusred wrote:How often to you listen to Rush, Hash?
Well, if we could get 660cc 3cyl Kei vehicles in the states, I'd definitely expect fewer hybrid sales. Unfortunately, the only true "city car" we have is the Smart, otherwise every compact comes over here with the biggest engine available and nothing smaller.themadscientist wrote:I know I don't want one. I would expect many people would be receptive to owing one though if purchase and long-term costs made sense and they saved on gas. One of the reasons I paid more to get a 4WD version of my little truck was so if I chose to I could bolt an electric motor to the transfer case and convert it to a home made hybrid. After a few weeks though the 660 3 banger was so good on gas the hybrid idea was no longer the best option.
Yeah, Smart cars suck.480sx wrote:Bleh, smart cars.. Dumbest car EVER. My freaken 94 integra got better gas mileage by far than the 'smart car' and if i got into an accident with it i wouldnt be pulled out of it in pieces.
I'd imagine that there is a lot more to those statistics than the article suggests. Gas prices coming down to more reasonable levels would have a pretty big impact on hybrid sales as this is the most quantifiable aspect of owning one. But car sales in general are down quite a bit due to the recession. When the high gas prices and the recession were both occuring concurrently, then I'd imagine, the need to seek cost saving alternatives would be higher. But with only one factor being out of the picture at the moment, many might simply be reluctant about buying any new car. WE would need to see a many more statistics to draw any kind of conclusion either way...Bubs daddy wrote:
Well, that may be true in DC but a lot of the country is in a hybrid sales slump. Don't assume DC represents the rest of the country. 80 day supplies elsewhere.
"In July, U.S. Toyota dealers didn't have enough Prius models in stock to last two days, and many were charging thousands of dollars above sticker price for the few they had.
Today there are about 80 days' worth on hand, and dealers are working much harder -- even with the help of $500 factory rebates -- to move the egg-shaped gas-savers off lots from Santa Monica to Miami."
http://www.latimes.com/busines...story
Not necessarily. Obama is going to actively penalize electric power plants as part of his carbon credit plan which will increase the cost of electric power to the population. Other manufacturing will also be penalized which will raise the cost of batteries and the like for these vehicles as well. End result will not be a cost savings as the vehicles will cost more to purchase and be a "wash" to operate. Maint and repair will be higher too.marlin29311 wrote:The car that is going to matter is the electric car - Aka the Chevy Volt and the like...these are cars that people will more likely get excited over, simply because it can remove gas from the equation for people that drive under 40 miles per day...and it will significantly lower the bills for those that drive in the under 150 miles per day boat...
Hush you. We don't need to hear form any right-wing bible thumpersCold_Zero wrote:With all the attention that you all are pouring on Rush Limbaugh, you would have thought that he won the 2008 Presidential Elections and not Barack Obama. Awe, what's wrong guys? Don't have GW Bush to kick around now, that you have to come up with a straw man in order to continue the Bush Derangement Syndrome and ‘defeat’ conservatism?
LOL, did you just paste this in here from the "anal poisoning" thread, or vice versa?Cold_Zero wrote:With all the attention that you all are pouring on Rush Limbaugh, you would have thought that he won the 2008 Presidential Elections and not Barack Obama. Awe, what's wrong guys? Don't have GW Bush to kick around now, that you have to come up with a straw man in order to continue the Bush Derangement Syndrome and ‘defeat’ conservatism?