carloslebaron wrote:Le Verrier was right after all, that the planet Vulcan exists and is the cause of the weird perihelion of Mercury.

Bye Relativity, Vulcan has been pictured and is a fact now ha ha ha...

http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulcan ... al_planet)

szh wrote:

carloslebaron wrote:Le Verrier was right after all, that the planet Vulcan exists and is the cause of the weird perihelion of Mercury.

Bye Relativity, Vulcan has been pictured and is a fact now ha ha ha...

http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulcan ... al_planet)

From your own link: "No such planet was ever found, and Mercury's orbit has now been explained by Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity."

Ah, yes, I forgot ... you think that general relativity is not real, inspite of tons of evidence to the contrary in Physics.

Why do you delight in proving your stupidity day in and day out?

Z

carloslebaron wrote:Vulcan was never saw again...until recently...you can see now it in the video...

carloslebaron wrote:But, does Vulcan or time really exist?

The answer is no.

carloslebaron wrote:So, what good is Relativity when its calculations work with Mercury only and fails with the rest of the planets? Because you know -and the readers of this thread must know- that the whole planets of the solar system have the same weird behavior at their perihelion, having Mercury's as the most noticeable...but all the planets of this solar system show the same phenomenon, and Relativity's formulas and equations fail to calculate properly the rest of the planets ...

carloslebaron wrote: From your own link: "No such planet was ever found, and Mercury's orbit has now been explained by Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity."

Ah, yes, I forgot ... you think that general relativity is not real, inspite of tons of evidence to the contrary in Physics.

Why do you delight in proving your stupidity day in and day out?

Z
Wikipedia is not quite right, because some astronomers claimed to have seen such Vulcan in Le Verrier years, for that reason Le Verrier himself pushed his hipothesis. Later, when officially the search for such a planet was made, Vulcan was never saw again...until recently...you can see now it in the video...

Look at it this way:

1)- Le Verrier made excellent calculations of the periphelion of Mercury by inventing the existence of a new planet, and the results of his formulas and equations did fit properly.

2)- Einstein made excellent calculations of the periphelion of Mercury by inventing the existence of a flexible time, and the results of his formulas and equations did fit properly.

But, does Vulcan or time really exist?

The answer is no.

Then, both, Le Verrier and Einstein, are wrong, their "excellent" calculations inventing a planet like Vulcan or a flexible time, are nothing but that: mere coincidences.

In order to prove that the calculations of Einstein with respect to Mercury are just a coincidence, I state and confirm, without doubt, with solid evidence, that using the same formulas from Relativity and applying them with planets Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, etc...the results given fail miserably.

So, what good is Relativity when its calculations work with Mercury only and fails with the rest of the planets? Because you know -and the readers of this thread must know- that the whole planets of the solar system have the same weird behavior at their perihelion, having Mercury's as the most noticeable...but all the planets of this solar system show the same phenomenon, and Relativity's formulas and equations fail to calculate properly the rest of the planets ...

Relativity is a good for nothing theory, face it.

Cheers.