[URL]
szhosain[/URL wrote:]
Very nice! I like the black color!
Note that I actually recommend driving it very hard occasionally during the initial break-in period. You need the pistons and rings to settle well, else there will always be a bit more blow-by than you want. Change oil and filter very, very soon and often during this period!!!
There have been informal studies that show that accelerating the pistons a bit harder than normal (not continuous high rpm, but high acceleration rates) is good. To make the pistons, and thus the rings, "reach" a teensy amount higher than normal in the cylinder walls. Apparently, (and I am NOT an expert,) this makes the rings score the cylinders higher up the walls and sets them better.
Take this info for what it is worth. All I can say, in my case, given the very low oil consumption I have given other 2003 era M45's, it seems to have worked!
Z
Thanks for the compliment! I'd sworn that I would never own another black car as it's sooo hard to keep clean, but I think it looks great when it IS clean, and besides that, it was in stock!
Interesting point about the break-in. Lord knows that must be one of the most highly debated issues regarding cars. I've done quite a bit of reading about engine break-in, and "Motoman" has a pretty good article about the "hard break-in philosophy"...
http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm
As convincing as his argument is*, the best way to break-in an engine still seems to be under debate. I've read some articles that contradict the "hard break-in" theory, and there was a recent article in Road & Track (At least I think it was R&T) that mentioned Motoman's article, but they disputed his claims. It's my understanding that most manufacturers run each engine on a dyno to ensure that there are no leaks or other problems, and I understand that some manufacturers (Such as AMG and BMW's "M") run the engines hard to both seal the rings properly and to verify it's power output.
I suspect that the ideal break-in is somewhere in between. I believe that it's not beneficial to baby the engine, nor is it ideal to run it super hard either. I've always taken something of a middle road in regards to break-in. Basically I "cycle" the engine through various rev ranges, starting at a relatively low rpm, and then progressing to higher and higher rpm as the miles accumulate (Reaching max rpm within 500 miles**). One of the important steps imho is to allow the engine to coast down from high rpm (i.e., run it up to say, 5000 rpm in second gear, and back off the throttle w/out upshifting). This builds up crankcase pressure which helps to expand the lower piston rings (Oil control rings) so that they set against the cylinder walls. I've owned more than a few high performance cars and motorcycles, and I've always broken in each car/bike the same way. Each car or bike has never burned a drop of oil and always produced excellent dyno numbers compared to other stock examples (Albeit I did not dyno all of them). So I think the whole break-in process is still under debate!
* One thing that I disagree with is his reasoning behind why the manufacturers reccomend their break-in period. Sounds pretty thin imho...
** At which point I have the oil changed.
Best regards, Matt