Review: 2011 Kia Optima SX Turbo

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Copied from http://jesda.com/2012/01/16/review-2011 ... -sx-turbo/


Back in 2007 I rented a Kia Optima from an Enterprise counter in Tampa:
Image


Image

Driving it was like putting a fistful of crackers in your mouth and trying to eat them all at once: tasteless, dry, and bland, leaving you begging for water.

What a difference four years makes.

The new 2011 Optima was designed by Peter Schreyer, the man behind the Audi TT, A3, A4, A6, and Volkswagen New Beetle. Styling was always a weak point for Korean automakers, and hiring Schreyer away from the Volkswagen/Audi group was quite a coup, as significant as the new 274-hp Theta II turbocharged engine powering the Optima.

The Optima I drove belongs to my friend Josh who traded in his Mazda Protege 5 and assumed a new lease. The pictures I took, unfortunately, are at night, so here’s a picture from the internet of an identical Optima photographed in the daylight:
Image
You can clearly see the Schreyer/Audi influence in the headlights, proportions, and side profile. For an entry-luxury car that’s a few coins over $30,000 with every option, it looks like it ought to be $55,000 or more.

WALKAROUND

The first thing I noticed when opening the driver’s door were the lighted sill plates, a nice touch often reserved for cars twice as expensive.
Image

Illuminating the Kia logo in bright red is a bold move, one suggesting that Korean car owners are free to be proud of their purchases. No longer is the average Kia owner a meth addict with a 200-point credit score. Average transaction prices are higher and the typical Kia customer is wealthier and more educated than before, stealing several thousand sales from Toyota and Honda.

Image

Infinity audio was exclusive to well-optioned versions of Chryslers, Dodges, and Jeeps. The system in the Optima is commendably powerful but lacks a bit in brightness and details. Dare I say... it could use a little sparkle. For most people, it’s good enough to leave as-is.

Notice the real stitching on the door pull that wraps around the power window and door lock switches. In the Chevy Malibu, this stitching is fake.

Image

The controls wrap around the driver and the steering wheel is thick with controls for audio, telephony, cruise control, and information displays. All Optimas have push-button start.

Image

The piece that wraps around the top, right, and bottom of the center stack is covered in real stitched material, making the cabin look quite a bit more expensive.

Image


At startup, the LCD screen in the gauge cluster shows a greeting animation. Cycling through the menus brings up fuel data, maintenance reminders, and trip information.

Image


Image


Image

Here’s a closer look at the steering wheel.

Image

Like Audi, the knobs, buttons, and displays light up bright red. A hard drive allows music to be stored onboard. The only option absent from this car was navigation.

Image


Image

A full-length panoramic sunroof slides open with a pair fabric rollers.

Image

Another feature unexpected for this class is a backup camera, adequately usable even at night.

Image

Rear seat room is quite generous. Observe the amount of space available in front of my knees. The upward swoop of the C-pillar unfortunately makes the back seat feel a bit cocooned and obscures the blind spot.

Image

The insides of the wheel spokes are painted black to make them look more dramatic. Note the Korean-made tires from Nexen, a perfectly respectable manufacturer that’s been in business since 1942. Hankook and Kumho are also based in Korea.

This generation of Optima is assembled in Georgia at a non-union plant.

Image

Inspired again by Audi, the Optima’s rear LED tail lights draw a sleek horizontal shape.

Image


Image

This fender vent is fake as it is on most cars.

Image


Image

Ribbing on the wing mirrors reduces aerodynamic turbulence, resulting in a quieter ride at high speeds.

Image

And there’s the trunk.

DRIVING

I’m glad to see the auto industry catching on to forced induction. I love the silent, electric-like pull of the turbo in my classic Saab 900 and my former Volvo S60 T5, and it’s even more impressive in Kia’s “GDI Theta II” 2.0L 4-cylinder engine, producing 274hp without a hint of turbo lag.

Years ago, it was impossible to sell Americans on the idea of a small-displacement engine in anything but an economy car, especially when gas prices were hovering around two dollars per gallon. Even Saab, under GM’s guidance, adopted a V6 to compete with BMW, Infiniti, and Lexus.

With inflation-adjusted fuel prices nearing an all-time high (peaked in 1981), public demand for small forced-induction engines and hybrids has increased, with turbochargers and superchargers being the cheapest to implement reliably.

<em>Consider this:
</em>--In 1995, the Cadillac Northstar V8 put out 300hp, or 275hp in the detuned version. Fuel consumption in a front wheel drive 1995 Cadillac Seville STS was 15 mpg city, 23 mpg highway. It was capable of 0-60 in 6.4 seconds.
--For 2011, the Kia Optima Turbo I4 produces 274hp. Fuel economy is 22 city, 34 highway. It soars to 60 mph in 6 seconds.

That’s a 47% improvement in highway fuel economy and a 15% improvement in 0-60 acceleration. Who would have thought, in 1995, that the Koreans would be making this kind of progress 16 years later?

In the real world, the Northstar V8 will gladly soar onward to 155mph in Z-rated versions of the Seville. The Optima seems to lose its steam at higher speeds. That doesn’t really matter to most -- how often do you intend to exceed 85 mph?

Under full throttle acceleration from a dead stop, the Optima SX will spin the tires all the way through third gear, quite a difference from turbos of the past where off-the-line acceleration was typically sluggish. Peak power arrives at only 1750 rpm for an almost electric-like surge of torque (269 lb-ft). That torque curve remains fairly flat up to nearly 5000 rpm. Torque steer, thankfully, is almost non-existant.

Romping on the Optima over and over is addictive, producing a swell of power that comes on like a geyser.

There’s nothing remarkable, good or bad, about the 6-speed automatic. I neglected to sample the manual shift mode, and the fact that I didn’t need or remember to is sufficient evidence that the transmission requires no additional outside input.

So, we’ve established its ability to move in a straight line.

While Kias of the past drove and handled like agricultural equipment, the new Optima is worlds apart. Its sport suspension does feel like it would benefit from summer sport tires. The Nexen all-seasons are perfectly competent for daily driving and the occasional mash of the throttle, but you can feel a little bit of protesting as you throw the 3400lb (relatively light) Optima around corners.

The electric steering system is noticeably quick, responding crisply to inputs, though more feedback would be appreciated. It offers more road feel than a Saturn Aura or Pontiac G6, but it lacks the lively sizzle you get from a Mazda 6.

The optional sport suspension (front struts, multilink rear) did a more than commendable job of controlling body roll without producing a jarring ride. Though the Optima was noticeably stiff over minor imperfections, it wasn’t enough to detract from the enjoyment of the car. At highway speeds, cruising was exceptionally stable without being jittery.

Turbo models also receive upgraded brakes with 12.6” discs, and the car comes to a stop with impressive force.

SITTING

What about comfort and convenience? The SX Turbo at just over $30,000 comes with bluetooth, HID headlights, memory power seats, a dual-pane panoramic sunroof, satellite radio, onboard music storage, a backup camera, heated and cooled front seats, heated rear seats, an Infinity sound system, dual-zone climate controls, a few lighting upgrades, and Bluetooth.

That’s a metric ton of luxury goodies for midsize family car money. It makes you wonder what separates a standard car from a luxury car anymore. For now, the Optima SX Turbo falls under entry-luxury, and I would certainly choose it over the equally equipped Lexus ES350 which costs at least $5000 more.

You probably wouldn’t believe me if I told you that the Optima was quieter on the highway than the new Lexus ES350 I drove last year, but it’s the truth.

One minor disappointment were the front seats which would benefit from larger side bolsters, longer seat bottoms for better thigh support, and softer padding. I don’t know how they would perform over a long distance, but I suspect they would be a bit of an annoyance.

If $30,000 is more than you want to spend on a Kia, the 200hp naturally aspirated LX version with cloth seats starts at only $21,000, arguably a much better bargain than the compact Buick Verano at $23,470.

All this car needs is a nice set of Michelin Pilots or Bridgestone Potenzas.

---------------------------------------------------------

RATINGS:

Ride: 7/10 — Crisp but not jittery. Firm but not harsh. I would appreciate the firmness of the ride more if the handling was as sharp as the taut damping suggests.

Style: 9/10 — Peter Schreyer has experience in making front wheel drive platforms look muscular and lean. This is a successful design.

Powertrain: 9/10 — The little engine that can.

Braking: 9/10 — Good feedback, predictable pedal travel, firm grip.

Steering/Handling: 7/10 – The Nexen all-season tires are perfectly sufficient, but sufficient tires don’t do the car justice. What’s the point of a sport suspension and 274 horsepower if the tires aren’t able to keep up? The electric steering is quick and responsive but lacks communication.

Audio/Accessories: 8/10 — The plethora of multimedia options, color displays, and luxury features like cooled/heated front power seats and heated rear seats places the Optima in a class just above the midsize norm. The Infinity sound system needs some refinment.

Interior: 8/10 — There’s quality materials all over, all precisely assembled and nice to touch and look at. The black interior with fake carbon trim feels a bit stark, but the gauges and displays make up for it.

Comfort: 7/10 – Heated and cooled power seats are a nice plus, but the front seat shape is a bit off. Rear seating is commodious. At highway speeds, the cabin is as hushed as any premium car on the market.

Quality/Reliability: Unknown — There were no significant issues with past Kia Optimas, but the new turbocharged engine and 6-speed automatic are unproven because they are new. Overall build, paint, and assembly quality deserve a 9/10.

Overall Value: 9/10 — It’s better looking and more fun to drive than the more expensive Lexus ES350. Lower trim levels offer significant value-oriented alternatives to the Camry, Passat, and Accord.

VERDICT: If you don’t mind the badge, it’s the four-door bargain of the decade. Even setting aside the discounted price, the Kia Optima is impressive to look at, fun to drive, and nice to be in.

---------------------------------------------------------

SPECIFICATIONS:

2.0L turbocharged GDI Theta II Inline-4
274 hp, 269 lb-ft
6-speed automatic
0-60 mph: Just over 6 seconds
Curb Weight: 3385 lb
Economy, City/Hwy: 22/34 mpg
Original MSRP: $30,200


User avatar
breadbox
Posts: 8549
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:09 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX
89 Koop
84 720 4x4KC
Location: Va Bch

Post

nice Jesda.

User avatar
bundy26
Posts: 1044
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:52 am
Car: 2011 Buick Regal turbo
Location: Dover NJ

Post

Nice write up :dblthumb: , test drove a base LX and was impressed with it's finish, the only thing negative I see about the SX would be the lack of a 6 speed manual, other than that it's a great car for the money.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I want to know more about NVH/engine refinement. Does it sound like a typical 4? Does it idle like a typical 4? Does it thrash along at 3500+rpm like a typical 4? It's impressive that it actually bests my (very small) V8's torque below 2000rpm (AJ35 will do about 252 ft-lb at 2000rpm), but that's not enough to make up for being a 4-banger unless it's free of the other sins of the format. I need low-RPM cruise, I need silky idle, and I need not-horrible engine noises coming through the firewall. I also don't want my car to sound like a wet fart. Can it fart around at 25mph in 5th or 6th gear and not feel and sound like a dead robot's futile attempt to escape a blender? What's the RPM at 65 and 75mph?
It's not that I don't love what the turbo Theta does...I'm just very much aware of how crude and harsh even very refined V6s feel to me after years of being spoiled by luxury V8s. And fours aren't sixes, so this has even more catch-up to play. I'm not interested in a crude powerplant. It's why I hate the Cologne V6 outside of trucks, and it's one of many reasons I can't stand the QR25.

I love Kia's new look, which I feel is the RIGHT way to do what Acura is doing wrong. It's sharp but curvy, clean but interesting, and distinctive without being obnoxious or overly-thematic. I also think that Kia's corporate grill design is one of the only ones I've EVER liked, and one of the only ones that doesn't get in the way of the rest of the car's styling. The Optima is definitely the best relization of the new look. I'd LOVE to see what Kia would do with the Genesis platform (the sedan, not the coupe). A little more nose and a little more butt and you'd have a car I'd be proud to show off.
The one part of the car's styling I do not like is the line at the top of the doors and along the roofline that continues rearward after the glass has ended. Move it on TOP of the roof, like the Fuga concept Nissan showed years ago, and you're set. But as it is on the Optima it's jarring and odd.

I love the driver-angled center stack so much. EVERYONE ELSE PLEASE DO THIS. No more hanging-blob for the radio. Sedans are not minivans. There should be no break in the surface from the radio to the arm rest.

This sucks:
Image

This rocks:
Image

Heavy
Posts: 786
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:40 pm
Car: 1992 Mr.Two, 1996 LS4HUNNID, 1999 Appliance on wheels.
Location: Danbury CT

Post

looks like the dash was heavily influenced by the A4

Image

Image

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Great writeup!

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

Nice review!
I love the styling on the Optima, I was blown away when I first saw it in Korea.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:I want to know more about NVH/engine refinement. Does it sound like a typical 4? Does it idle like a typical 4? Does it thrash along at 3500+rpm like a typical 4?
They must have stuffed the firewall with a metric ton of sound deadening. It sounded like a four-banger at high-revs but it wasn't a crude or intrusive noise, nor was the idle lumpy.

It actually sounded muscular. Reminded me a lot of the Saab 9-5 with the B235R.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV9BnOxrt0I[/youtube]

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

I was wondering why Kias were not kicking in the gag reflex as bad as they used to. They finally outsourced styling to someone with STYLE!

User avatar
asoomal
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm
Car: 2001 Subaru Impreza L 5MT (Daily)
1992 Nissan 240SX SE 5MT w/HICAS (Being restored)
Location: Canada

Post

Jesda wrote:
MinisterofDOOM wrote:I want to know more about NVH/engine refinement. Does it sound like a typical 4? Does it idle like a typical 4? Does it thrash along at 3500+rpm like a typical 4?
They must have stuffed the firewall with a metric ton of sound deadening. It sounded like a four-banger at high-revs but it wasn't a crude or intrusive noise, nor was the idle lumpy.

It actually sounded muscular. Reminded me a lot of the Saab 9-5 with the B235R.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV9BnOxrt0I[/youtube]
That thing is begging to be shift harder.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Jesda wrote:
MinisterofDOOM wrote:I want to know more about NVH/engine refinement. Does it sound like a typical 4? Does it idle like a typical 4? Does it thrash along at 3500+rpm like a typical 4?
They must have stuffed the firewall with a metric ton of sound deadening. It sounded like a four-banger at high-revs but it wasn't a crude or intrusive noise, nor was the idle lumpy.

It actually sounded muscular. Reminded me a lot of the Saab 9-5 with the B235R.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV9BnOxrt0I[/youtube]
That sounds pretty decent. Smoother and with less buzzy resonance than I expected.

User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 6928
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

My wife has a Sonata turbo... same car/motor. I love it!

Clearly it's not a V8, but it has enough power and the gas mileage more than makes up for the difference in sound and vibration.

I wish we would have gotten the Optima.. the design is WAY nicer. But, I get a supplier discount on the Hyundai (and not on Kia), so we got an awesome deal on the car.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Eikon wrote:Clearly it's not a V8
I'm not complaining that it isn't a V8, merely pointing out that years of driving VH and AJ powered cars has increased my sensitivity to the harshness of V6s and I4s. These days I get in my dad's VQ powered Maxima and can't stop thinking how coarse it feels. But a V6 is still a lot smoother than an I4 in most cases, which is my real concern: is the turbo 4, which Kiundai offers in lieu of a V6, refined enough that you can forget it's a 4? My concern was (is) whether it feels like a 6, not an 8. I can get an LY7 in a Malibu...a bit less torque than the Sonata/Optima. But a lot smoother than a VQ, too. I want Kia/Hyundai to convince me that I should take their offer over GM's. And YES, it will ABSOLUTELY take more than fuel economy to do that. If I wanted fuel economy that badly I wouldn't be shopping for V6 midsizers in the first place.

User avatar
rc1honda
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:25 am
Car: 1992 240 sx
2007 BMW 335xi
2008 Honda CBR1000RR
Location: Chicago burbs

Post

Seems like a great car. The only thing that would stop me from pulling the trigger on owning one would be the FWD. Living in a inclement weather state means you need a reliable winter car. I know that FWD is fine in winter or even RWD with winter tires, but i have been spoiled with AWD platforms.

My current 3 series has a nice blend of RWD bias in normal conditions and being able to transfer power where and when needed. Admittedly the Xdrive does kinda suck in comparison to quattro, or Subi systems. It would be nice to see the Optima with a AWD option with nice RWD bias. I bet that car would be a blast. That would have me seriously test driving them the minute my warranty was up with bimmer.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

You're never going to see any transverse-format sedans offering RWD-biased AWD. The 3-series is a RWD platform, so the AWD system will naturally be biased that way. Nobody's transverse AWD systems do much more than shift a small fraction of power rearward when the front wheels slip. They act like FWD 99% of the time. There's no handling benefit, no real effect outside bad-weather road conditions, and you certainly won't get anything exciting happening out back from it. It's not even in the same league as your 3 series. AWD on Fusions and Tauruses is a marketing gimmick focused on bad drivers who crap themselves at the first sight of clouds.

User avatar
rc1honda
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:25 am
Car: 1992 240 sx
2007 BMW 335xi
2008 Honda CBR1000RR
Location: Chicago burbs

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:You're never going to see any transverse-format sedans offering RWD-biased AWD. The 3-series is a RWD platform, so the AWD system will naturally be biased that way. Nobody's transverse AWD systems do much more than shift a small fraction of power rearward when the front wheels slip. They act like FWD 99% of the time. There's no handling benefit, no real effect outside bad-weather road conditions, and you certainly won't get anything exciting happening out back from it. It's not even in the same league as your 3 series. AWD on Fusions and Tauruses is a marketing gimmick focused on bad drivers who crap themselves at the first sight of clouds.
Yeah the transverse layout never occurred to me. I still think its a shame. It seems like a great car for the cost. You get a lot of performance and electronic goodies, but does it really deliver driving pleasure? I really don't want to have to spend 45k for a car the delivers the same amenities and performance with the security of AWD. Why can't auto makers cater to me god dammit.

Maybe i should just move to AZ and buy a mustang already. :tisk:

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

I absolutely love the lineup out of Korea. Instead of spending money on overpriced, premium-location advertising (like BMW), funding ventures that don't provide a good ROI, or wasting assets on traditionally American manufacturing techniques and traditions, H & K are sinking their capital into things that benefit the consumer (NOVEL IDEA - hey Nissan, pay attention).

This includes industry-leading warranties, solid products and attractive non-scam incentives.

I said it 3 years ago, and I think it every time I see a new Kia or Hyundai on the road - The Koreans are kicking America's (and Japan's) collective arses.

My favorite thing they build is the Optima, but I'd own a Sorrento, a Sonata, an Equus, a Genesis sedan, a Rio hatch (totally cool) and maybe even a Veloster (once it gets a real engine).

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

My favorite thing, the commercials!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2xDiXhr ... re=related[/youtube]

User avatar
dre1507
Posts: 4355
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:41 pm
Car: Some boring Lexus that's currently at home with a smashed mouth (crashed).
Location: Miami, FL

Post

Saw an Optima on the road today, and I must say that Jesda isn't lying. The car looks spectacular in person. Anyways, the fact most of the Hyundais and Kias I see on the road now are either current or 1-2 model year older says to me that the Koreans are doing something right. It's not like a few years back where all the H & K that I saw on the road were driven by some dude or girl seeming no older than 25, looked seriously aged, and like the neighborhood kids took a liking to showering them with rocks. Not to mention the I-let-my-3-year-old-do-whatever-he/she-wants-in-my-car interior.

User avatar
bloodspread
Posts: 801
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:37 pm
Car: 1989 240sx fastback and a 2009 Aveo

Post

My Brother traded in his 40th anniversary 370z for an Optima Hybrid ... I was speechless... but I guess he wanted better gas mileage, more space, and cheaper insurance and car payment.

User avatar
Rev_D21
Posts: 5946
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 9:49 pm
Car: 1986.5 D21 LB HD 2WD V6 5Speed
1991 D21 Reg 2WD Auto
1995 D21 Reg 2WD 5Spd
1996 D21 Reg 4WD 5Spd
2012 Versa 1.6S 5-Speed
Location: Somwhere in Western NY
Contact:

Post

Kia reminds me of what Datsun did in the 70's. I work as a tech counter partsman for a Hyundai dealer and can tell you I am thinking the next car for my wife might be an Elantra. What's going to be hot is the Elantra coupe, looking forward to seeing that. Another really overlooked model is the Azera which has a redesign coming out soon. The Genesis Coupe just screams future classic and if I personally want to get another car someday that would be it. From what I have seen the products are pretty reliable and safe. Hyundai also makes many update flashes for the various modules on board the cars which tells me they are constantly improving the product even after the sale. Since post-2002 Nissan is dead to me there will most likely be a Korean car in my driveway next year.

User avatar
dre1507
Posts: 4355
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:41 pm
Car: Some boring Lexus that's currently at home with a smashed mouth (crashed).
Location: Miami, FL

Post

Rev, I feel you on the korean-car-in-driveway sentiment.


Return to “General Chat”