Republican proposes tax deduction for pets.

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
srellim234
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:12 am
Car: 2007 Nissan Versa SL hatch w/CVT
(sold 08/2011)
2008 Toyota Prius
(purchased 04/2016)
Location: Laughlin, NV

Post

This has actually been proposed by a Republican.

http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.....aspx

"...Kathy at Blogging For Michigan also notes that people can deduct expenses for their own medical care only if those costs exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income, so the bill would give your pet's medical bills better tax treatment than your own... "

This is the kind of idiot that the Democrats are trying to appease? Maybe we can get health care reform if we tell the Republicans that our kids and spouses are actually our pets!


User avatar
szh
Posts: 15932
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 12:54 pm
Car: 2018 Tesla Model 3.

Unfortunately, no longer a Nissan or Infiniti, but continuing here at NICO!
Location: San Jose, CA

Post

srellim234 wrote:This has actually been proposed by a Republican.

http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.....aspx

"...Kathy at Blogging For Michigan also notes that people can deduct expenses for their own medical care only if those costs exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income, so the bill would give your pet's medical bills better tax treatment than your own... "

This is the kind of idiot that the Democrats are trying to appease? Maybe we can get health care reform if we tell the Republicans that our kids and spouses are actually our pets!
Clearly, there are the occasional idiots in the Senate and Congress ... at all levels (State and Federal and local). Maybe more to politics and idiocy mixing than I would have thought possible:

http://www.modbee.com/opinion/....html (a bi-partisan proposal, by the way)http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/...P.DTLh ... /1....html (protesting the deletion of Pluto as a planet!)http://slog.thestranger.com/20...e_day

Z

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

s***, I'm all for any sort of tax deduction!

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Throw the bum out!

However, lemme put on my Devil's Advocate hat.

A quote from the article: "How about this idea? If you can't afford the real cost of pet ownership, don't get one."

If we said, "If you can't afford to raise a child, don't have sex", we'd be pummeled by screeching hordes.

Studies show that pet ownership can reduce blood pressure, promote healing, and improves the quality of life for many Americans, especially shut-ins, the disabled, the chronically ill and the elderly.

Yet medicinal marijuana got the support IT needed... Hmmm...

Just some thoughts.

(I still think it's silly...)

User avatar
BusyBadger
Posts: 3753
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 3:20 pm
Car: '92 Nissan 240SX
'05 Nissan 350Z
'13 Nissan Juke
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:If we said, "If you can't afford to raise a child, don't have sex", we'd be pummeled by screeching hordes.
But it should still be said, and often.

One of my major problems with the Republican party is their concern for the fetus but lack of care for the children that the fetus develops into. We need a co-signer agreement for couples that want to have children but may not be financially able to support it. No cosigner, no baby.
AZhitman wrote:Studies show that pet ownership can reduce blood pressure, promote healing, and improves the quality of life for many Americans, especially shut-ins, the disabled, the chronically ill and the elderly. (I still think it's silly...)
Maybe its the new government health plan! I'm all for it, we've got 8 cats. And I also think its silly too, but I certainly wouldn't oppose it!

I might even get some more.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:If we said, "If you can't afford to raise a child, don't have sex", we'd be pummeled by screeching hordes.
I constantly battle with my general distaste for additional limitations on personal freedoms and my desire to get people to stop breeding willy-nilly.

There *should* be some sort of audit process, although then people would just start having them "accidentally", and what would the government do, abort them?

Unsolvable problem, unfortunately, unless we just start sterilizing people with IQ's below a certain level, which I'm certainly open to.

User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 25014
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

Simple, limit welfare to have a "child maximum". Hell, limit welfare completely to have a time clause. You'd be surprised how much work a hungry person will do when they want to eat.

Yeah, not very Christian of me....

User avatar
EvillE423
Posts: 752
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:19 pm
Location: Tri-Cities, TN

Post

audtatious wrote:Simple, limit welfare to have a "child maximum". Hell, limit welfare completely to have a time clause. You'd be surprised how much work a hungry person will do when they want to eat.

Yeah, not very Christian of me....
Except for maybe the elderly that can't work or people on disability that have no other means of income.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

You need a license to drive a car, or own a gun, and I would suggest a badly raised child can do far more damage than either. When I watched the movie idiocracy, at the beginning where they were contrasting the irresponsible people reproducing like rabbits and the educated responsible people winking out of existence I didn't laugh; it's happening.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

HashiriyaS14 wrote:
Unsolvable problem, unfortunately, unless we just start sterilizing people with IQ's below a certain level, which I'm certainly open to.
But wouldn't that eliminate a lot of Honda owners...? j/k

User avatar
smockers83
Posts: 3889
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:07 pm
Car: 2006 G35 Coupe

Post

AZhitman wrote:If we said, "If you can't afford to raise a child, don't have sex", we'd be pummeled by screeching hordes.
HashiriyaS14 wrote:I constantly battle with my general distaste for additional limitations on personal freedoms and my desire to get people to stop breeding willy-nilly.

There *should* be some sort of audit process, although then people would just start having them "accidentally", and what would the government do, abort them?

Unsolvable problem, unfortunately, unless we just start sterilizing people with IQ's below a certain level, which I'm certainly open to.
themadscientist wrote:I watched the movie idiocracy, at the beginning where they were contrasting the irresponsible people reproducing like rabbits and the educated responsible people winking out of existence I didn't laugh; it's happening.
There's actually a reason, well correlation would be a better word, for all of this. Those that are educated and make more money care more not about the quantity of children they have, but the quality of their children, so they have less. This allows them to give them a better quality of life. The other reason is that these people also focus more on their careers as well, so less children allows them to focus more. On the flip side, the ones who are poorer with fewer opportunities (the irresponsible ones) will have more children because they not only don't care more about quality, but it increases the chances of having a successful child and when you get into third world countries, it increases the chance of one of the children surviving.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post



Return to “Politics Etc.”