Republican convention

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

stebo0728 wrote:http://www.caintv.com/Whatreallykilledt ... myDebu-341

Very well put. Spot on. This man should be debating Obama, not Romney.
It's a shame Mr. Cain will probably be remembered more for sugggesting that "9-9-9" tax proposal during the Republican primaries (to which the RNC responded Nein-Nein-Nein :chuckle:)


User avatar
stebo0728
Posts: 2810
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:43 pm
Car: 1993 300ZX, White, T-Top
Contact:

Post

I loathed the day he announced that plan. Its actually a good, bold sorta plan, but it was too specific. People aren't ready to actually make a big change, they are still in the platitudes stage, generalized conjecture about changing the system. Actual plans are too scary.

Will be fun to see how the Brothers Grimm Convention goes this week.

User avatar
telcoman
Posts: 5762
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:30 am
Car: Tesla 2022 Model Y, 2016 Q70 Bye 2012 G37S 6 MT w Nav 94444 mi bye 2006 Infiniti G35 Sedan 6 MT @171796 mi.
Location: Central NJ

Post

I didn't watch it but according to news reports Romney didn't do all that well.
The recent polls confirm that.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162- ... on-speech/

Telcoman

User avatar
telcoman
Posts: 5762
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:30 am
Car: Tesla 2022 Model Y, 2016 Q70 Bye 2012 G37S 6 MT w Nav 94444 mi bye 2006 Infiniti G35 Sedan 6 MT @171796 mi.
Location: Central NJ

Post

WDRacing wrote:
Obama is a failure, period. Anyone that see's anything else is lying to themselves.

Romney/Ryan 2012
Only if they can't understand or failed math.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Here's some failed math for ya smaht guy. Obama spent 5 trillion dollars so far during his administration. That's 5,000,000,000,000 . He's created 4 million jobs. That's 4,000,000. That's 1,250,000 per job created. Yeah, he's doing just great Howie...at f*** this country up.

There are fewer people working now then when he took office and the average income for those that are working is down 4 thousand/annual.

Obama has the gay, poor, ethnic and now obviously we can include stupid vote all locked down. Congrats!

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

Michael Steele is obviously a shill for Ron Paul. Who is this guy anyway? Oh, really? He's the former chairman of the RNC? Umm.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MPcTWCoBTM[/youtube]

User avatar
stebo0728
Posts: 2810
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:43 pm
Car: 1993 300ZX, White, T-Top
Contact:

Post

Terrific write up furthering what I wrote above about the poor.

http://www.boortz.com/weblogs/nealz-nuz ... eing-poor/

The poor have no grasp of delayed satisfaction.
article, per Heritage study wrote: More specifics? Here you go. This is from a two-year old study from The Heritage Foundation.
  • The typical “poor” household in America has a car
    78% of “poor” households in America have air conditioning
    64% of “poor” households in America have cable or satellite TV .. most have two TVs, along with a DVD player and VCR
    Most “poor” households in America with children have a gaming system such as an Xbox or PlayStation
    38% of “poor” households in America have a personal computer
    Most “poor” households in America have a refrigerator, an oven and stove, and a microwave. They also have other household appliances such as a clothes washer, clothes dryer, ceiling fans, a cordless phone, and a coffee maker.
    The typical “poor” American has more living space than the average European.
    The typical “poor” American family is able to obtain medical care when needed.
    The average “poor” household in America claims to have sufficient funds to meet all essential needs.
article wrote: Let’s consider the head of a household of four making minimum wage in America. More specifically – a one-parent household of four. The mom – making minimum wage – and three children. Compare this to a two-parent household with two children making $60,000 a year. Wyatt Emerich of The Cleveland Current ran the numbers on these two families and discovered that the single-mom with three kids, and no job marketable job skills that she could use to earn more than minimum wage, actually has --- now get this --- actually has more disposable income than the family making $60,000. How does that work? Well .. you throw in the various government income redistribution programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit, food stamps, the school lunch program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Medicaid, CHIP, Section 8 rent subsidies, and the heating assistance program and you have little Miss Minimum Wage – earning $14,500 a year – actually walking away with $37,777 in disposable income. Meanwhile, the family earning $60,000, after taxes and childcare costs, brings home about $34,366.
And risks of being poor...
article wrote: Do you want me to tell you about poor people and risk-taking? Here you go:
  • Having unprotected sex so that your boyfriend can knock you up, and then having a child you absolutely cannot afford to raise … that’s risky.
    Ignoring your education and job training opportunities to the point that you can’t qualify for a job that earns more than minimum wage … that’s risky.
    Getting hooked on drugs … that’s risky
    Spending your spare money on lottery tickets and at your local Tresses and Talons shop … that’s risky.
    Taking money you could use to buy your kids a book .. and spending it instead on a cool tattoo. Risky.
    Getting a job --- and then making a habit of not showing up for work on Monday’s and Fridays … that’s risky.
    Refusing to move out of a crime-ridden inner city environment and relocating, by whatever means necessary, to an area with better schools, less drugs and crime, and some basic job opportunities … that’s risky. And don’t give me this “can’t afford it” crap. Our ancestors did that walking alongside covered wagons with a few tables and chairs and maybe a bed inside. They had to dig holes in the ground to drop a deuce along the way. You have a car. There’s rest areas on the expressways. Load it and use it.
    Embracing the “no snitching” culture so that the police can’t do an effective job of ridding your neighborhood of the thugs that shoot your friends on street corners … risky.
Now, it should go without saying, not ALLLLLLLL poor people fit the descriptions above. There are some who do all they can do, and still end up trapped in a loop. But do we really require record defecits and debts ceilings to deal with these tragic few?


Return to “Politics Etc.”