I'll look through the records (I have the files going back to the original owner) but the problem is warranty-type work isn't recorded for the most part. For example, the person I bought it from had to haggle to get the proof of the timing chain guard being replaced in '97, it's a printout from the warranty department rather than a bill of any sort. That's pretty standard policy, when I worked for a certain motorcycle company we couldn't give any written proof of serious warranty work (as in, say, an engine rebuild) because the company preferred to stay tight lipped about any work that may or may not have been done on a newish vehicle.Q45tech wrote:Depends if it is an original 150k 91 AT or was replaced like the majority were under warranty bfore 70k?
My question to you is if the "experts" think that you should continue use the transmission with contaminated fluid, why isn't it delivered new with contaminated fluid?Desmoquattro wrote:The fluid on the dipstick is pinkish-grey. I've been told, and also read in numerous sources, that after a certain point changing the transmission fluid will only create more problems, as removing the old fluid with the clutch material floating around in it will generate more slip (supposedly the material in the fluid acts as an abrasive that generates friction in the clutches).
The problem is there isn't really any consensus on the "point of no return" theory of transmission fluid. Search around and you'll see just as many people argue for it as for against it. Hence why I ask the question here to see if anyone has experience with it on the Q specifically; I agree that leaving contaminated oil is counterintuitive, and the first time I heard someone say that I felt like asking him if he had had his head examined recently. I like to look at all the sides, you'd be surprised at how little consensus there is in the mechanical world. I worked as a motorcycle mechanic for a while, I've seen a lot of disagreement on how things should or should not be done.maxnix wrote:My question to your is if the "experts" think that you should continue use with contaminated fluid, why isn't it delivered with contaminated fluid?
There is no reasonable rationalization. You're dilemma is whether it is worth $235 to do a mechanical fluid exchange (or 2, given the color - no nonsense about drain and fill being effective enough here), pan drop, inspection, clean, then filter, gasket and one time use bolt replacement?
Your call. If you have the funds on hand as you should, effect the replacement as soon as possible, add the auxiliary ATF cooler and replace the rear main seal and maybe the turbine sensor rather than use the old one. You don't wnat to pull the transmission twice in a very short period of time.
I got one and I haven't had any negative things happen. I had a BG shop do it. Took 2 hours and cost me $150. Then again, I just cracked 90k on my Q. I think that a flush is only bad when you have an abused transmission. If it's already pretty clean, cleaning it some more shouldn't hurt it.Desmoquattro wrote:I'm thinking I'm willing to "risk" a fluid change considering it was done at least once in the last four years (if it hadn't been done since new it would have been a different story, then it's no way).
(By the way, fluid flushes are extremely bad and are not recommended by any manufacturers. You risk pushing sludge and debris into the valving and destroying the transmission in short order. I've heard plenty of horror stories about transmission going kaput only a few thousand miles after a fluid flush.)
Did the records show a driveshaft replacement? I'm having somewhat the same issue and after searching on the board, I found that all Q's pre-1994 had an issue with the rubber thing on the driveshaft wearing out quickly. In 94 the piece was redesigned and is "beefier". I find that the driveshaft piece, transmission mounts (possibly motor mounts too.) and the exhaust hangers can give that vibration issue.Desmoquattro wrote:Looks like I'm answering my own questions here, after doing some research on the site -
I don't think it's the replacement transmission, I can't see any drain plug on the underside of the pan. Mind you I don't have access to a jack at the moment so I could only get a quick glance with a flashlight.
Second, after looking through some other posts, I'm thinking maybe it isn't the transmission at all, it sounds more like the transmission mounts that have given out. That would explain why it shifts great and but still get low frequency vibration at certain points. If revving the motor in park or neutral, there is some vibration (almost as if a cylinder was misfiring above idle, but the motor runs perfectly). Putting it into reverse and slowly releasing the brake causes a mechanical crunch from the underside of the car (not from inside the transmission).
SO first order of business is having a look at those mounts, I guess.
1.) There is on this board. Change in color and smell is a direct indicator of the fluids degree of demise. New fluid is always best as knowledgeable automatic transmission engineers will always attest.Desmoquattro wrote:1.) The problem is there isn't really any consensus on the "point of no return" theory of transmission fluid.
2.) Search around and you'll see just as many people argue for it as for against it.
My question to you, to whom is it a "known problem"? If the transmission is toast, it is toast. There is no evidence (zilch, none, zero, nada) that retaining worn fluid will extend a transmission's life, period. Quite the contrary. But a pan drop with no mechanical fluid exchange is like putting a butterfly band-aid on slashed femoral artery.Desmoquattro wrote: My concern was more with making the transmission slip by removing the old fluid, which is a known problem on high mileage automatics.
Quick question, the "rear engine mounts" that are sold on InfinitiPartsUSA, do they come in a kit of two or are they 120~ each?
The site shows $120, but sometimes, the listed price is incorrect. It's a little messed up I think. What if the customer had no knowledge of NICO or knew to call Joe and just ordered from the site? They'd pay out the nose.Desmoquattro wrote:I'm not disagreeing with you on those points, it certainly makes sense to replace the fluid regularly. My concern was more with making the transmission slip by removing the old fluid, which is a known problem on high mileage automatics. Regardless I'm biting the bullet and doing a pan drop and filter replacement.
I have a small exhaust leak I'm getting welded tomorrow, so I'll look at the hangers and mounts while I'm in the shop. I'm guessing they are more than likely overdue, there is nothing in the service records about them. Nothing about the driveshaft either, but like I said the warranty stuff isn't listed on the work orders. The car was serviced regularly at the dealer from new right up to 2004 so if any work needed doing it was probably done.
Quick question, the "rear engine mounts" that are sold on InfinitiPartsUSA, do they come in a kit of two or are they 120~ each?
It's all perspective. What cost $100 from Scottsdale would cost me $175-$200 at the local stealership.Haitian_King wrote:The site shows $120, but sometimes, the listed price is incorrect. It's a little messed up I think. What if the customer had no knowledge of NICO or knew to call Joe and just ordered from the site? They'd pay out the nose.
I've never ordered anything from there. But Maxnix states way lower prices for parts than what's shown on the site. When I thought I had to replace my transmission, he told me that I could get one for $2500 from Joe, but the website showed it at like $4500.AlabamaDan wrote:
It's all perspective. What cost $100 from Scottsdale would cost me $175-$200 at the local stealership.
I've found the prices on the site to be right on with what I'm getting charged on the phone. Do you get further discounts from Joe? Infiniti did raise all their prices across the board last year.
Are you recommending we use Toyata T4 ATF? Is that what you use?Q45tech wrote:The Toyota T4 ATF is a premium synthetic usually made by Mobil in US.
Anyone have experience 1st hand?Haitian_King wrote:I've never ordered anything from there. But Maxnix states way lower prices for parts than what's shown on the site. When I thought I had to replace my transmission, he told me that I could get one for $2500 from Joe, but the website showed it at like $4500.
I guess that's what maxnix did then. It was in a thread from about 3-4 months ago.captainluigi wrote:Reji, this is off the topic of this thread but; infinitipartsusa.com(ISO) internet prices are the same as nico prices with maybe some personalized service added. recent example is my crank pulley/harmonic balancer. lists for $357. @ miami stealership. our price $222. now thats cool + 3day shipping. we NEVER get anything in 3 days here in the keys.
Good stuff. Would you mind posting pictures of the install? I've been studying the FSM, but I'm still not clear on it. I hear it's a very easy job, about an hour, but I don't like to work on things unless I'm absolutely clear.Desmoquattro wrote:Had a look under the car today while it was on the lift. Good news is that it's a replacement transmission with the drain plug on the pan.
Good or bad news, depending on how you look at it, is that all the mounts are beyond shot. The exhaust mounts are both split and one has a broken stud. The transmission mount is looking sorry too, with loose rubber coming out the sides. So I have the new parts on order, I'll install them soon.
I like the mid 90s SS a lot too, it's a classic design.But as you found out, they have serious problems with the weld around the headstock. If I had nickle for ever one I've heard of... Amazingly some people still manage to get them replaced under "warranty" by Ducati. I had looked for one but came across a well-used 916 for a good price, so I snatched it. It's an astonishing machine, I adore it and I don't plan on ever getting anything else, except maybe an MV F4 if I can figure out a way to import one into Canada.bullittandy wrote:I just saw your signature and laughed. I used to own a 95 900SS and even though I was prepared for the dry clutch sound-it still startled me when I first heard it. That bike was wonderful, crazy torque, sick sound and in my humble opinion is the most beautiful bike ever designed.
Also typically Italian, a frame weld broke on the top frame rail connected just below the bars!!
How can one tell if the transmission was indeed replaced under warranty?Q45tech wrote:Depends if it is an original 150k 91 AT or was replaced like the majority were under warranty before 70k?
The guys on the board had me check my AT pan. If there's a drain plug, like the one on an oil pan, then it's most likely been dealer replaced under warranty. If there's no drain plug on the ATF pan, then most likely you still have your old factory one.lino wrote:
How can one tell if the transmission was indeed replaced under warranty?
Here is a page of my service records. Take a look at the last line. One Infiniti representative told me that it means that my transmission was replaced, while another was not sure:
It's so straightforward, you can see it at a glance. When you are under the car you'll see the transmission pan, and near the back of that close to the primary driveshaft there is a rectangular support attached to a crossmember that slings underneath the transmission. That's the transmission mount. Just behind it are the exhaust mounts, rubber-sandwich looking things connected to the crossmember in the centre and connected to two arms that support the exhaust pipes on either side.Haitian_King wrote:
Good stuff. Would you mind posting pictures of the install? I've been studying the FSM, but I'm still not clear on it. I hear it's a very easy job, about an hour, but I don't like to work on things unless I'm absolutely clear.
Alright then. I'll have to get underneath. I just made friends with a man who has a lift in his garage. He's an aircraft mechanic by night and an import technician by day. He's quite knowledgeable about Domestic, European (Primarily VW), and Japanese cars (Nissan and Mitsubishi). My lucky day eh?Desmoquattro wrote:
It's so straightforward, you can see it at a glance. When you are under the car you'll see the transmission pan, and near the back of that close to the primary driveshaft there is a rectangular support attached to a crossmember that slings underneath the transmission. That's the transmission mount. Just behind it are the exhaust mounts, rubber-sandwich looking things connected to the crossmember in the centre and connected to two arms that support the exhaust pipes on either side.