
Hi, and thanks so much for joining our list! At the moment we're sharing our designs with different manufacturers in trying to determine the best route for us to have the production version built. A lot of it depends on their capabilities as well as cost (we're trying to have them built here in the USA) without sacrificing even the least bit of durability. We anticipated that we may have to use different methods of manufacturing, so we had designed a few different versions just in case. The one in that solidworks snapshot is a cast version, and those upper legs may end up looking like that if we end up casting with steel primarily to reduce weight, as opposed to the aluminum version of the stands which would have to be far more solid to sustain the same loads. That snapshot was always our favorite design because it took the most engineering effort to perfect it, and as a result has that aeropsace look to it. I just also want to add that each design had to meet the same criteria of strength and functionality.PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:Great news! I was wondering when the next step would be.
Do the main beams really look like the ones in CAD?
I just signed up for the list.
Hi, and thank you for bringing that up because we do get a lot of questions about the pins. Just to throw some numbers out there, they are steel and have a diameter of 1/4" and each is in double sheer and capable of sustaining up to 19Kn (1.9 metric tons of force per pin). Each pin will only need to bear half the weight of whatever each stand is supporting, so you would have to load 4 metric tons on EACH stand before you approach pin failure. Considering that the stands are rated to 2 tons/pair, that gives you a safety factor of 4 for each pin. Even so, I agree with you that visually they may not appear to be that strong at first glance, and we may have to go with thicker pins to inspire more confidence in the stands' durability.szh wrote:Hmmm ... I like what I see a lot! Have one question: you mentioned this already, but do you all think the pins are strong enough? They look a little bit on the smallish side. So, some limit testing would be good to see where they give way - including for the entire stand itself.
Yeah, I understand that each stand will only take 1/4th of the car weight when used correctly, but more margin for strength can't hurt.
Z
I really appreciate you joining the list, and thank you also for taking care of those hyperlinks!float_6969 wrote:I joined the mailing list. I also edited your post so your links were hyperlinks. Click the edit button on your post (looks like a pencil) to see how to do that in the future.
Ok great, and no worries! Thanks for letting me knowfloat_6969 wrote:Yes, that is the pencil. Due to the activity of some past members, there is a time limit to edit posts. I forgot about that. Sorry!
Much appreciated!centralcoaster33 wrote:Very neat product/ invention here. I like it a lot.
I wonder what height I can get out of these things. Tall enough to clear my 240sx transmission bell-housing I hope. That's about the tallest I go with my car. Also, I have a Craftsman 3 ton floor jack. It's got a large footprint. Like, it's pretty wide at the lift plate between the wheels. Are you testing with a variety of jacks?
I like the adapter plates for pinch welds. This product seems very well thought out.
I'm surprised you haven't smashed these up yet to find their true breaking point and weak spots. Maybe that happens after you decide upon the manufacturing process and materials?
BTW - the first thing I thought when I read about the pin comments is that their likely strong steel and there are two of them, so they share a load. I read your response about using 1/4 inch and having calcs to back it up. I looked again and they appear small. It's a visual perception thing. I agree with your thought that you could to beef it up to appeal to the masses. Since you'd be exceeding structural requirements I'd go for a proportional and pleasing look. At least 3/8ths I'd think.