Removing manifold butterflies

Discuss topics related to the CA18DE and CA18DET series engines.
diamondstar36
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:03 am
Car: Cars and sleep
Contact:

Post

How difficult is it to remove the intake manifold butterflies? I'm not crazy about the design and all the vac. crap that drives it. I'd rather be rid of it all.


User avatar
r34 gtr
Posts: 8909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 9:33 am
Car: 98 Nissan Frontier XE 4x4
95.5 Audi URS6 Avant 5spd
03 BMW 330i ZHP 6spd
89 Nissan 240SX base CA18DET
Location: Creepin' in your crawl space
Contact:

Post

me too, will i gain/lose anything with them out? regardless, its one less thing to go wrong, and that seems to happen alot on my car.

- tim

NeedCAforS13
Posts: 4340
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 3:58 pm
Car: CA swapped S13 coupe
Location: Spartanburg SC
Contact:

Post

I just took off the round pieces... left the bar in there. I didn't feel like trying to plug the holes it leaves in the manifold. I think it will be ok... there is 2 screws on each round plate, and 4 round plates total! took like 5 minutes tops:)

Sean

User avatar
CA19DET
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 9:30 am

Post

take the steel rod that holds the butterflies can be taken out and the holes weled..

i would like to see a before and after DYNO with and without the butterflies..

PacManVR4
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:34 pm

Post

Im curious now. i want to do it. i want to know if it would realley help. I know on a dsm a standard intake vs a Cyclone dual runner the flowed withen 1cfm or each other but the cyclone was more responsive in town.

diamondstar36
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:03 am
Car: Cars and sleep
Contact:

Post

They flow almost equal to eachother at peak performance. Before then the cyclone restricts a lot of air, robbing bottom-end power in place of responsiveness.

User avatar
CA19DET
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 9:30 am

Post

i actually think the secondary butterflies would produce more torque than without them...

User avatar
paul_s13
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 7:20 am
Contact:

Post

CA19DET wrote:i actually think the secondary butterflies would produce more torque than without them...
It didn't on mine, thats why i didtched the Japanese spec head and used a UK/SA spec head and got LOADS more power with the same boost.

With a T3 @ 13psi I got 226bhp with the Japanese head (granted the engine was a bit tired) but after I switched to the UK head and a few other mods I got 301bhp @ 14psi with the same turbo and chip (standard injectors and MAF).

User avatar
r34 gtr
Posts: 8909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 9:33 am
Car: 98 Nissan Frontier XE 4x4
95.5 Audi URS6 Avant 5spd
03 BMW 330i ZHP 6spd
89 Nissan 240SX base CA18DET
Location: Creepin' in your crawl space
Contact:

Post

awesome. i might have to give it a try. if its free, and since i have insane amounts of free time, i dont see any reason not to if there is some miniscule chance that it could do something for my car.

- tim

diamondstar36
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:03 am
Car: Cars and sleep
Contact:

Post

Now there's an idea. I need to go hit up the junkyards.

User avatar
r34 gtr
Posts: 8909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 9:33 am
Car: 98 Nissan Frontier XE 4x4
95.5 Audi URS6 Avant 5spd
03 BMW 330i ZHP 6spd
89 Nissan 240SX base CA18DET
Location: Creepin' in your crawl space
Contact:

Post

and that is a good idea...junkyards rule.

- tim

User avatar
paul_s13
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 7:20 am
Contact:

Post

The thing you have to remember is that if you have a JDM clip then your ecu will be mapped for the butterflies, taking them out may cause some underfuelling because you will be flowing more air, a euro spec map may help if you are removing the butterflies because the UK/euro head is 4 port without intake runners and should have similar flow rates to the de-butterflied JDM head.

There is quite a difference between the JDM and Euro maps.

diamondstar36
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:03 am
Car: Cars and sleep
Contact:

Post

Fuel is easy enough to correct with a piggy-back. But getting a UK map would be much more difficult.

User avatar
paul_s13
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 7:20 am
Contact:

Post

diamondstar36 wrote:Fuel is easy enough to correct with a piggy-back. But getting a UK map would be much more difficult.


Its easy, you can download the map from varoius sites and i'm sure slw240 could burn the chip for a small fee, the am27128c eprom chip can be got for next to nothing.

If you don't want to do that you can probably get a whole UK ecu from http://www.sxoc.com/vbb for £20-30 and there won't be import tax.

But it would have to be a post 92 ecu for the o2 sensor support.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

So was the debate ever settled as to wheather the UK head flowed better than the JDM head? (4port vs 8 port) This is excluding the intake mani, just the head. Anyone?

User avatar
Nismo1182
Posts: 1697
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 6:51 am
Car: Z06

Post

Paul, im looking to get another CA head and im not to thrilled aobut the 8 port design my CA has. How much is the 4 port head with complete intake manifold,injectors, TB, etc over there?

User avatar
paul_s13
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 7:20 am
Contact:

Post

Nismo1182 wrote:Paul, im looking to get another CA head and im not to thrilled aobut the 8 port design my CA has. How much is the 4 port head with complete intake manifold,injectors, TB, etc over there?


Well lets put it this way, I got given a CA for nothing once! but you can probably pick up a whole engine that has killed the crank due to conrod bearing failure for £100 this will get you everything, but if your just changing from a jdm head all you need is the head and the small inlet manifold to plenum section and the fuel rail, everything else fits.

Check the sxoc for adverts.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

Still didn't answer my question...

User avatar
Nismo1182
Posts: 1697
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 6:51 am
Car: Z06

Post

Id assume the 4 port head would flow better. After taking apart my intake manfiold and seeing how everything goes, Id rather have a 4 port head. Plus the no butterfly valves are another good benefit.

User avatar
paul_s13
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 7:20 am
Contact:

Post

float_6969 wrote:Still didn't answer my question...


Well when i spoke to norris designs about it they didn't rate the jdm head and said it never got the same power as the 4 port head.

User avatar
r34 gtr
Posts: 8909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 9:33 am
Car: 98 Nissan Frontier XE 4x4
95.5 Audi URS6 Avant 5spd
03 BMW 330i ZHP 6spd
89 Nissan 240SX base CA18DET
Location: Creepin' in your crawl space
Contact:

Post

well....damn...i want one. im guessing this SWAT ecu will be able to handle the removal of the butterflies as it overfuels the car to death anyway. then im running rich on top of that..and ive got an safcII..i think im covered. anyway, ill give the whole removal stuff a try.

- tim

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

wonder how much shipping is from the UK.... Hehehehe.


Return to “CA18DE / CA18DET Forum”