iluvmyVersa08 wrote:
I asked my dealer about installing a remote starter and they basically said it was a very bad idea, and that if something did happen in the future, Nissan would not be responsible for any damages (ie. warranty would not cover it).
They are lying to you. In the 16 years I have been doing this, my shop has installed around 5000 remote starters. Out of those 5000 we have had ZERO dealership issues. In other words, we have never had a remote start issue that caused the denial of warranty from a dealership. Service departments will blame a low tire pressure on the remote starter if the car has one..... it's ridiculous. But I have never had a dealership prove that an issue with the vehicle was because of the remote starter. Now keep in mind, whenever you hear these horror stories of cars catching on fire, burning up BCM's etc., it's because of a bad install. That's why you don't have non-experienced installer work on your car. Make sure they have at least 3 yeas or so under their belt and have installed at least 50 - 100 starters.
For what it's worth, every dealership in my town, including a big Nissan dealership bring me their brand new cars to have remote starters installed.
Below is legal proof that a dealership cannot deny you warranty just because you have a remote starter or alarm on your car. Now if the system is installed incorrectly, not fused etc. and thus burning up a relay in the car..... then they are obviously not going to warranty that relay as long as they can prove it was the remote starter/alarm. What this act states is that a dealership cannot void your "entire" warranty because of the installed unit. So if the rear end goes out on your car, they can't blame it on the remote start, and then deny you warranty on it.
Magnuson Moss Act
Under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Improvement Act, a vehicle manufacturer may not make its vehicle warranty conditional on the use of any brand of security system unless the manufacturer provides the system free of charge or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has specifically published that only the vehicle manufacturer’s product may be used. To challenge a false claim, ask the person to put it in writing, or request the vehicle manufacturer’s security system free of charge. If you are charged for the security system, or they refuse to give you a written statement, there may be a violation of Federal law.
This is the actual language of the act:
No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumer’s using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this sub-section may be waived by the Commission if:
1. the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and 2. the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest.
The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of any action brought by the Attorney General (in his capacity as such), or by the Commission by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to restrain (A) any warrantor from making a deceptive warranty with respect to a consumer product, or (B) any person from failing to comply with any requirement imposed on such person or pursuant to this chapter or from violating any prohibition contained in this chapter.