nope. my brother got one but the car was in my dad's name. my dad said it wasnt him and the cop just dropped the ticket.... not fair though. my car is in my name and my moms and it came for me. I warn my brother about the traffic light and 2 weeks later he gets the same ticket at the same spot I warned him about lolsrwong wrote:i saw a thing like this on "speeders fight back" the owner was out of country, and his employees was using the work truck and got a ticket from those cameras. owner showed proof he was out of country and everything, and judge said it doesnt matter. it's whoever the car is registered to. lame, i know
"nope" is incorrect on your part. Police don't give out camera tickets so there has to be some other reason or way that it was dropped by a cop, he would have had to take it to the city. The reason why this varies is because some places treat the camera tickets as non-moving violations while others treat it as a moving violation and additionally, some of these cameras are operated privately and some are state-owned or city-owned. Treating it as a non-moving violation means the ticket goes to the registered owner regardless of who was operating the vehicle and you have little opportunity to fight the ticket unless there is a larger effort or case against that particular camera as being defective, biased, etc.Hussain wrote:nope. my brother got one but the car was in my dad's name. my dad said it wasnt him and the cop just dropped the ticket.... not fair though. my car is in my name and my moms and it came for me. I warn my brother about the traffic light and 2 weeks later he gets the same ticket at the same spot I warned him about lol
That's how I feel about the red light cameras... in trying to get people to not cross red lights, unfortunately it may make them paranoid and stop suddenly, etc. I know in my own experience I've done that a couple of odd times, at a yellow light, and a right turn on red, stopped when I could have cleared it safely, without the guy behind me probably cussing me out as he's slamming his brakes.Hussain wrote:oh and theirs proof that these camera's cause just as many accidents (if not more) then they prevent. studies have shown that people get paranoid at camera intersections and stop too sudenly and get rear ended. I've seen people floor the brakes RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE LIGHT when it turns yellow!!! they could safely make it no problem but they're scared. It's causing traffic and accidents.sorry for the rant, I just really really really HATE right turn cameras.
mrodrig2 wrote:"nope" is incorrect on your part. Police don't give out camera tickets so there has to be some other reason or way that it was dropped by a cop, he would have had to take it to the city. The reason why this varies is because some places treat the camera tickets as non-moving violations while others treat it as a moving violation and additionally, some of these cameras are operated privately and some are state-owned or city-owned. Treating it as a non-moving violation means the ticket goes to the registered owner regardless of who was operating the vehicle and you have little opportunity to fight the ticket unless there is a larger effort or case against that particular camera as being defective, biased, etc.Hussain wrote:nope. my brother got one but the car was in my dad's name. my dad said it wasnt him and the cop just dropped the ticket.... not fair though. my car is in my name and my moms and it came for me. I warn my brother about the traffic light and 2 weeks later he gets the same ticket at the same spot I warned him about lol