It is very obvious that they are at fault. I hope you have documents of everything...including phone calls and such. A judge...even if he is knowledgeable or not is going to know by that pic of the wheel that the company is at fault and is selling faulty products for which they should be held liable for. I too do not want a "sponsor" like that to be selling to this community...if it were an individual selling faulty merchandise everyone would know and action would be taken...so why should a big company such as wheelmax/exel be any different. Honestly instances like this is what makes me glad I either stick with OEM or a "reputable/more expensive" company...glad you're alright man that could have been fatal.sweet3rdgen wrote:I am looking into having a lab do a stress test on the remains of the rim. It all depends on how cost prohibitive it is.
I was hoping Banky would contact me again and try to provide some kind of customer service, but it looks as though the motis operandi of Wheel Max is to ignore the person and they will go away. Now I am looking at persuing litigation. I was hoping to avoid that.
Can't say I didn't give them opportunity
It may be obvious to you and me but a court will need more "undeniable" proof. If I go to court with what I have now I may or may not win. If I get laboratory proof how can they argue?jgauspohl wrote:
It is very obvious that they are at fault. I hope you have documents of everything...including phone calls and such. A judge...even if he is knowledgeable or not is going to know by that pic of the wheel that the company is at fault and is selling faulty products for which they should be held liable for. I too do not want a "sponsor" like that to be selling to this community...if it were an individual selling faulty merchandise everyone would know and action would be taken...so why should a big company such as wheelmax/exel be any different.
I just LOVE how people pull assumptions outta their a$$es.sweet3rdgen wrote:
And we are only fooling ourselves if we think NICO will ask them not to sponsor anymore. Wheel Max is money, it is income.
AZhitman wrote:
I just LOVE how people pull assumptions outta their a$$es.
Integrity > money for us. Always has, always will. You'd know that if you'd been here longer. If it were all about the money, I wouldn't have dropped $6K on the event in ATL and another $3K on NICOfest. Think about it.
Based upon WheelMax's lack of response to me regarding this issue, we're dropping them as a sponsor effective 9/30/06.
So I think you owe an apology.
NICOwned!AZhitman wrote:
Based upon WheelMax's lack of response to me regarding this issue, we're dropping them as a sponsor effective 9/30/06.
So I think you owe an apology.
1) Understood, accepted, appreciated.sweet3rdgen wrote:1) Greg, I owe you an apology and a thank you. It is not often that anyone has integrity today, I am thankful of a forum that does. And I am very sorry that I assumed anything about this forum. Please accept my apology a for my foolish assumption.
2) AZHitman, I contacted Wheel Max for two reasons. First, because they sold the product, and second, because there is no contact at Exel because they are part of Wheel Max.
3) As for your assumtions that I may have been partly at fault I can only say WTF? How could any of the possibilties you presented result in a rim shattering as this one has and why would I do anything like that to risk the car I have put so much effort into building and my life?
4) But let me ease your mind. I check my tire pressure every month (as everyone should) I was not speeding (I did not receive a citation, police were on scene). The suspension is fairly new and very well maintained. I use only quality cleaning products on my wheels (correct for type). There are no pothole or debris in the road, save a manhole cover that sticks up maybe .75".
Yes, because forget drifting…traveling through potholes is a way more exhilarating experience.AZhitman wrote: Anyone know for sure if the driver hit a pothole?
Yes. He over inflated his tires to over 85 psi so he could adversely affect vehicle maneuverability, making the ride harsher, and therefore putting himself in harm from a blowout.AZhitman wrote: Do we know if the tires were properly inflated?
No. He drives an H2 Hummer and prefers the look of undersized tires and wheels.AZhitman wrote: Was the wheel of a proper load rating for the car?
After soap and water, he uses hydrochloric and sulfuric acid in a two-step process. It gives the rims and wheels that “just washed look!”AZhitman wrote: What did he use to clean the wheel? Anything caustic?
Yes. The OP ran over several boulders and logs before realizing this was affecting his gas mileage.AZhitman wrote: Was there debris in the road?
I don’t believe the cost of the cheap wheel is the principle of the matter. The guy could have been killed, yet despite your callousness, he takes the time to warn readers about the inherent risks of Exel wheels which he bought from wheelmax. If wheelmax knows, from prior anecdotes of similar experiences, that these wheels have an elemental risk of malfunction, then THEY ARE TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE!!!AZhitman wrote: What's he gonna sue for? Emotional trauma? Online pwning? He's out the cost of a cheap wheel. WheelMax (although I'm not defending them) probably can't be bothered with such trivialities - They should have at least replied with an effort to help, but the original poster should have gone straight to the manufacturer.
The only joke here, Son, is you, DDS Ricer.DDS_Racer wrote:HITMAN,
Your questions have to be a joke, right? Let’s examine this:
1) LEGITAMIT is spelled LEGITMATE. Learn that before you call someone a tool.superDorifto wrote:you are a tool...every question that greg posted was a legitamit one
2) If go back and read my original post on this thread you’ll learn that I’ve dealt with these Wheelmax pricks before. I completely understand what this thread is about.superDorifto wrote: and your sarcasm does much to illustrate that you dont understand the point of this thread.