Cjmartz2k wrote:I didn't see that one. You wonder why? Well, it doesn't say high flow, that's why.
So you do have absolutely no idea what turbo i am even talking about then. Just as i a suspected. Yet you still continue to argue?
Cjmartz2k wrote:Obviously, it took you a while to find it.
No, it was the first one i found, the internet is not that hard.
Cjmartz2k wrote:So you are calling a GT3071 with a custom exhaust housing made to bolt up to a RB a high flowed turbo?
No, GCG is calling it their bigest direct bolt on high flow turbo for rb25det. Which is a gt3071 core in a machined rb25 front cover and gcg's direct copy of the vg30det exhaust housing. Feel free to contact gcg to educate yourself further about the turbo in question. It is what gcg sell as their big rb25 highflow, simple as that.
Cjmartz2k wrote:Now who's the one struggling?
Evidently, still you, and it's become quite tedious.
At this point all you are doing is convincing me you have no idea what you are talking about and are completely oblivious to the turbo i have been discussing.
Cjmartz2k wrote:"Random" dyno figures? Your right, they were random. They were the first ones I came across. They weren't the lowest I could find in an attempt to prove my point. They were from the first 3 pages and pages 17-20 of that thread. They were ALL the ones I could find on those pages.
But why? Honestly why are you trying so hard to prove me wrong when you have no real reason to? What you have presented so far is meaningless when there are so many different "high flow" turbos available. Even from GCG you could get at least 2 different compressor options and 2 different exhaust options. You can't be sure any of those dyno results are using the same turbo i am talking about and you have no details on the exact state of tune.
Cjmartz2k wrote:How about your SINGLE "random" dyno that was the highest you could find after 24 hours worth of searching and is still not a high flow and still not 400rwhp.
Well it took less than 5 minutes to find. It's not a random dyno, it's one of my customers cars that i tune. I only used a car that i am familiar with so that i can be 100% sure i know the full story behind it and can provide relevant details if necessary.
That was the initial tune with that turbo, he had a smaller high flow before that made less power. After he sorted some issues out he came back and after retuning it made the same power on 16psi.
Cjmartz2k wrote:sure, print me out some of your own dyno sheets from your own shop. That will really convince me.
Well there we have it. You openly admit that you will not acknowledge that you are wrong even when presented with the exact evidence you have been asking me for. What is the point of all this? What are you trying to achieve here?
Cjmartz2k wrote:Sorry, we no longer have one on Okinawa, but I'll see what I can do.
Yet you have the nerve to demand evidence from me?
Cjmartz2k wrote:You have offered one misleading dyno figure (which, as you stated, still isn't 400rwhp)
How is it misleading, back that statement up.
Cjmartz2k wrote:and talked about how experienced of a tuner you are as your proof of your point that a high flow from GCG would be a good option for Anvil who is looking for between 400rwhp and 450rwhp and not so much customization to get it installed.
I never once said it was the best turbo for him. Please read more carefully and try to follow the conversation.
The real issue here is that you said the 450hp gcg highflow could get "nowhere near" that power. I say it can because i have personally seen it. You say it can't although you are completely unfamiliar with it.
Cjmartz2k wrote:I have provided a mountain of dyno results on a myriad of setups that are at best 40rwhp short of his goal (and that's with some big cams).
All you have provided is arbitrary data on random cars that you have no detailed and verifiable information on.
Cjmartz2k wrote:Yeah, I'm really the one that hasn't proven his point, aren't I?
Indeed.
Seriously, what is your real issue here? Why are you so determined to prove me wrong about this turbo? You ask me for proof of my claims and when i offer to provide proof, you say that you won't believe it anyway. Where is the logic there?
If you don't believe me then contact gcg yourself and get some details on the turbo so you know what you are talking about. Find out about the housings and wheel sizes and then decide if it is impossible to make the power. Even have a look at a compressor map for a 3071 on the garrett website.
You have made it clear that you are so stubborn and narrow minded that you will never admit you are wrong even when provided with the proof you have requested. If that is the case then there is no point in dragging this out any further.