Then there are people like me who are forced to do a rebuild from the get-go. LIke you said though, it's going to be nice having that security...originalsin wrote:looks 100% better, def was in need of the rebuild haha, i wish i had the money to rebuild right away so i could have the security of having a good engine, but it will happen in time
Just under $600 Canadian.ca18detizzle wrote:man that looks nice. how much did it cost you? just curious. too bad i know of no machine shops here in WA...
There is no benefit to a 5 angle valve job on this motor. The head design is so good to begin with that no difference would be had between a 3 angle and 5.turbo_blitz21 wrote:I am also in the process of doin a rebuild. Only I am doing a 5 angle valve job heh. Tomei cams and cam gears and a t3/t4 topmount kit. I will post some pics.
I agree with this! My machinist says it's pointless on such small valves anyways. 3 angle is more than sufficient.c-rad wrote:
There is no benefit to a 5 angle valve job on this motor. The head design is so good to begin with that no difference would be had between a 3 angle and 5.
Thanks for the reply! I have a small assignment for you if you're interested. Can you measure the depth of the flywheel area of your AWD and FWD transmission and also the length of the FWD spline as opposed to the AWD spline. Will your AWD flywheel fit into the bellhousing of the FWD transmission? Your response will be much appreciated and will serve as legitimate testimony for any and all newbies interested in interchanging parts. Though I know the answers, you have the pictures to go with your answer, so the proof is in the pudding.DjLiquid wrote:a 1988 Nissan Pulsar NX SE