Rear pads shot after 20k miles (f50)

[kev1n]

They were so thin that they were squealing like a stuck pig.

My question is this normal? or is this a crappy set of pads ( autozone, most expensive ones on the list)? or perhaps some type of a brake Biasing problem? maybe from calipers aren't working as strong as they should. Thoughts ?

[bullittandy]

I think many new cars have a much higher brake bias towards the rear of the car. Seems that sophisticated suspension geometry that allows less dive/more weight on the rear tires allows more braking ability. I don't know about the F50 but my wifes old 94 Accord wore out rear pads in the same amount of time-20-25,000 miles. Also, pad "hardness" influences longevity. You could put a plate of steel in the caliper and it would last 200,000 miles or you could put a piece of leather and it would last 10 miles. If they wore evenly then i don't think you have a problem.

[elwesso]

Yeah thats normal... 20k for a set of rear pads (rear F50 brakes are the sameish as the G50s), sounds about normal.