Post by
Bubs360 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/bubs360-u149356.html
Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:00 am
This is my own personal opinion based on my own personal experiences. If anyone does not agree, I'm sorry.
Drum brakes are simply outdated. For normal applications, they have absolutely no advantages over disc brakes.
They are more unreliable than disc brakes.
They have more parts that can fail.
They are not as effective at, you know, braking.
Something as simple as removing the brake drum can be an enormous PITA if you live in the salt belt.
Problems with drum brakes are harder to diagnose.
Most brake pads can be changed in fifteen minutes. Servicing any of the drum brake hardware involves taking the whole assembly apart. Putting it back together is like trying to install a jigsaw puzzle that could explode in your face at any moment.
If you are the type to take your car to a mechanic for repairs, it is a lot more likely that a mistake will be made in a drum brake service than a disc brake service. It would be very easy for anyone to accidentally install a return spring backwards or otherwise forget how a component went together.
The whole industry should have phased out drum brakes by 1985, and yet they are still here. All of the advances that have been made in automotive technology mean that drum brakes have been obsolete since, or possibly before, that time. The only real advantage to drum brakes that I have found is that they work better as parking brakes. That's about it. Companies that have wanted the parking brake advantage of a drum brake with the not-sucking advantages of disc brakes have incorporated the "drum-in-hat" rear brake design. This combines the advantages of disc brakes with the advantage of drum brakes.