Close. It's a Nissan owner forum. Specifically, a Versa owner forum.Clipsed wrote:I thought this was a Nissan forum, specifically a Versa forum???
And?Clipsed wrote:I thought this was a Nissan forum, specifically a Versa forum???
Appreciated. I don't like to brag (because while I'm smart, I'm undisciplined, so I'm not good at any one thing) but I was a Johns Hopkins youth when I was in Jr. High. I could have really been something, had high school not happened... but that is a discussion for another day.AZhitman wrote:EV, I knew you were sharp, but I have a whole new appreciation.
It is.Clipsed wrote:I thought this was a Nissan forum, specifically a Versa forum???
okay well on the topis of oceans, with the global temperature increasing its causing coral reefs to die of, and i think the term is "bleach". That sucks, since those are the most lively parts of out waters.AZhitman wrote:EV, I knew you were sharp, but I have a whole new appreciation.
....I'm more concerned with what we're doing to our oceans, rivers and lakes, than what we're doing to the skies and atmosphere......
Are you refering to cars needing stricter emissions? or Oil consumption, I'm just curious only because I dont see these as "agendas" but more like solutions. And just to clarify, its not only cars that pollute, but its the major point in this discussion since after all this is a Car forum.MinisterofDOOM wrote:Every time a major "issue" like global warming crops up, it's always conveniently directly related to somebody's agenda.
Clipsed wrote:I thought this was a Nissan forum, specifically a Versa forum???
I've seen a system like this before. The company, that made manure enriched topsoils, would place the manure into piles that would rotate every once in a while in huge cylinders. The methane would be captured and converted into electricity by way of burning it. The company was in a very rural area and didn't want to pay the thousands to have electricity run to the property. So they came up with the ingenious idea that costs roughly the same amount of money. The benefit comes from not having to pay a huge electric bill each month.cireecnop1 wrote:You know there are also farms that, to reduce the methane gases from the manure,run their power of "cow pies" and also their furnaces. Im not to 100%familiar with the theory but it has to do with a sealed system that rotates the manure or something
...gotta go to work but "I'll Be back"
I've heard of a few cities that use recycled rubber sidewalks to solve the problem of frost heaves under the sidewalks. It's costly to repair the sidewalk when heaves pop up or roots grow underneath. Freeze thaw cycles also help accelerate the life of the concrete. Rubber sidewalks are more flexible and can expand way more than concrete without breaking. It's very plentiful and God is it ever so soft on the knees. I've walked on it before and I love the stuff.Ever Victorious wrote:
And our state is trying something new:
Taking what would be waste tires, and turning them into new paving surfaces (they are experimenting with two new kinds of "quieter" pavement, one includes the recycled rubber...)
Gore is an absolute imbicile. Imagine if he had been elected prez?proxim2020 wrote:I also think that preaching to American's really won't do anything. We still have India and China who are heading down the same road that we are. Once we get those 2 countries on board, we can get a lot of progress done.
I was talking about pollution in general, not just transportation. Were you aware that 30% of the Nations ozone (as related to smog) is simply drifting over here from other countries? The EPA is constantly tightning the "noose" on products. We are far better than we once were and are improving all the time. Of course, those who want the US to turn green in a couple of years time simply want you to think everything wrong with the world environment is at OUR hands.cireecnop1 wrote:yea we're working real hard , We (the U.S.) dont want to have stricter fuel economy standards since they/we are worried that it will sink our already sinking American car companies.except thats backwards,that's why the less polluting,more efficient foreign cars are crippling our american auto industry. Last month didn't Toyota become the number one car in America? passing up GM and Ford and Chrysler? Diamler-Chrysler is now #2 and im sure thats only on a technicality of that fact that Mercedes is apart of their company. a good example of this is that almost everyone here bought their Versa for the fact of better gas mileage. I dont think GM or Ford even have a car that can compete with the V.
They still haven't moved up in rank yet, at least that's what Blomberg reports. They are still in #3, but it's expected that they will move to #1 before the year ends. They trail Ford by so little, that you can pretty much give them the #2 spot already. They will easily pass GM this year. I guess all those Red Tag and Employee discount sales just couldn't keep them at the top.cireecnop1 wrote: Last month didn't Toyota become the number one car in America? passing up GM and Ford and Chrysler? Diamler-Chrysler is now #2 and im sure thats only on a technicality of that fact that Mercedes is apart of their company.
It is important to remember that, like it or not, the US is seen as the world leader. It would have been beneficial had the US recognized that fact and made a commitment which wasn't strictly based on its own economy. While many like to lay the blame for the world's troubles squarely on the shoulders of the US, many would simply like to see them set a good and responsible example as a world leader.audtatious wrote:I was talking about pollution in general, not just transportation. Were you aware that 30% of the Nations ozone (as related to smog) is simply drifting over here from other countries? The EPA is constantly tightning the "noose" on products. We are far better than we once were and are improving all the time. Of course, those who want the US to turn green in a couple of years time simply want you to think everything wrong with the world environment is at OUR hands.