putting patents on things now-a-days is damn near useless as there are sooo many ways around it. All they have to do is change a few things and BAM..a totally different product according to the patent office.FAST-DATSUN wrote:sound like the ""COPIES OF OUR MOUNTS'' are not very close copies. send pictures of the other problems and I will address them. As for fitment How do I address that as I can not speak to your illegal copies on how they we made and how close a copy they are??????????????????????????????????????????![]()
Mack
Yes the mount were designed for the rb25 oil pan, if you use the 26 oil pan you have to raise the motor. You always have to disconnect the steering shaft to install the down pipe as it really tight......... You may have to move some oil/water lines also....noodl35 wrote:When I installed my rb26 into my s14, the mckinney mounts and DP were not a true bolt- on affair. The mounts actually had the engine too low (but then again im using rb26 cast alum. oil pan). I had to put one inch worth of washers on the driver side mount and half an inch on the passenger side so the pan would not hit the cross member. For the mckinney dp, you have to take out the metal oil return tube and totally cut and re-weld it so it doesn't hit the downpipe. I also had to bend alot of the turbo oil/water lines as well as the hard line located on power steering linkage. Just made sure the line didn't kink but it was close....very close. I did call Mack a few times and his tips helped immensely. It is a well made product, but what do you expect when you install an engine not meant for this type of chassis.
I actually had the old isolators because i bought these mounts years ago but never used them until recently. HIs customer service is top-notch. Called him and he sent me the new versions out ASAP for free. Can't beat that.
+1 same here alsoStricNyne wrote:i paid good money for my mckinney mounts and i am completely satisified. was pricey but i have not had to look at my mounts since i bought them







Bluefire wrote:I have also had some issues with the mckinney dp.
Stock R33 Rb26DETT with stock turbo side setup. As you can see from the pics, there was a huge gap on the second flange, that no amount of gaskets could have fixed. I ended up having to chop the downpipe and reweld it so the pipe flanges sat flush. Also both flanges were warped so they needed to be resurfaced. The downpipe also sat too close to the rear turbo oil return. I've used a mckinney dp on a previous swap years back and didn't have issues. I'm guessing they're jig maybe off.
I also had issues with they're mounting kit.
The angle of the lower engine mounts to the upper engine mounts are not the same causing the mounts to distort and bend. the motor sat very low causing clearance issues with the downpipe. I ended up having to toss a bunch of washers under the driver side mount until there were only a few threads left. Clearance issues were taken care of for the most part, but it could be better. Unfortunately in this situation it seems the problem is not in the jig, but in the actual design of the mount kit.
i consider mckinney stuff to be average quality, there stuff might not be well designed but it gets the job done for the most part. Fortunately for them, they don't have much competition in these niche markets so they're stuff doesn't have to be top notch, and they can charger whatever they want.
Just wanted to point out that you couldn't ask for more than that... well done Mack!Send me your address I will send you new red issolators and Please send the old ones back to me for testing... we are looking at the RB26 mounting kit design and build procedures...
Mack