Put a headgasket, and some headstuds on it and call it a dayNesquick wrote:buildin for a t67.
If you arent doing any hard tracking with the car where it will see sustained high RPM's I see no reason to dig into fixing the oil pump and snout issue.....Nesquick wrote:my rb26 is a R33. not sure what year tho....
You are correct, short of AEM's sucking, and a wiring issue I had, the engine setup itself, has had 0 issues its 2 years of existence....mattblancarte wrote:+1
I agree with Booztd 3. I do, however, have to say that I've heard that you can have issues with the stock pistons if you have more than 500hp. Booztd is proof of not having an issue (yet?) with that. I'll let him have the last word.
i think he may be using pfc d jetro to run on map. the pfc l jetro runs maf im honestly not a huge fan of aem, i have no idea if they have the option to run map or not and i agree with booztd getting your car on a dyno, getting a good tune and regular maintenanceNesquick wrote:im not going to be doin much tracking with this car, maybe once or twice a summer.
also, are you still running your MAF? if not, how did you convert it to MAP? (Boozted 3)
screw a D-jetro..lolNesquick wrote:im not going to be doin much tracking with this car, maybe once or twice a summer.
in summer its gunna be my dd, if i see a race, ill race, otherwise just give a bit of juice when i see a hot girl or sumthing lol
my trust oil cooler is still in good condish with steel braided lines.
so the oil shall stay cool.
my AEM EMS is on the way right now, and i can get on a dyno whenever i want seeing as my cousin owns a performance shop, im also getting him to tune it.
also, are you still running your MAF? if not, how did you convert it to MAP? (Boozted 3)
I have found the best EBC's are the most simplistic ones....mattblancarte wrote:I'm running Apex'i Power FC. My tune is awesome. ^_^ Very reliable.
My HKS EVC VI, however... Huge pain in the *** to figure out. I can't find ANYTHING on it. Even two really awesome tuners have had trouble figuring it out. It's current setting is nice because it gradually builds boost, starting at about 9psi at 3000rpm, building to 15psi at about 6500rpm. I'm running stock r34 turbos.
I wanted it to be set to full boost as soon as possible, but we couldn't figure out how to make it come in full at low rpm. If we set the initial boost too high, it would try to gradually build to dangerous levels.
I guess the gradual build at lower boost is just fine for HPDE.
If you already have an AEM EMS on the way then theres no reason to ask.......Nesquick wrote:yea currently im running a power fc, but got no controller for it
all of my buddies are running AEM.
MR2 with 480whp....AEMPlymouth lazer with 400whp...AEMTalon with 380whp.....AEMMKIII with 350whp....AEM
all love it and never had a problem with it.
should i stick with my pfc? opinions???
thanks guys
Not the case for the RB26. You might be confusing that 500hp "limit" with the RB25. The RB26 has a much thicker top ring and lower ring land so it's able to handle more stress than the RB25's. Plus the RB26 pistons have internal oil cooling channels. Please refer to my thread about RB25/26 piston comparison or something like that. There should be pics too.mattblancarte wrote:I agree with Booztd 3. I do, however, have to say that I've heard that you can have issues with the stock pistons if you have more than 500hp.
I had SP do the original E85 tune on the 60mm turbo. I did the tune on the 66mm turbo afterwards....l0nestar wrote:Andy,Who did your tuning? Sound Performance in Chicago, correct?
Ah, indeed.Darius wrote:Not the case for the RB26. You might be confusing that 500hp "limit" with the RB25.