Rb26 vs Rb25

Discuss the RB20, RB25 and RB26 series engines.
Nissan2nr
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 9:37 pm

Post

What are the main differences besides displacement. I heard the 26 motors are much strong internally and can take much more abuse than the 25's.

Is that true? I have heard that the rb25 is not much stronger than the sr, but the 26 is about as strong as a 2jz.

How much of this is bs.

I personally thing the 25's are just as strong as the 26's but I maybe wrong, can anyone help?

Thanx


User avatar
lofapoo
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 1:37 pm
Car: Toyota sedan

Post

Well, stock the 26 has two turbos as the 25 has one.

As for this bit...:

Quote »I have heard that the rb25 is not much stronger than the sr[/quote]

Tell you what. Get a magnum and shoot a SR, then shoot an RB. Tell me, do you still believe the RB is about as strong as the SR? :D RB is known to withstand 400HP (I'm sure it's way higher but I don't have any numbers right now) on stock internals, as the SR would need a rebuild to push 300 or so :p

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

Nissan2nr wrote:What are the main differences besides displacement. I heard the 26 motors are much strong internally and can take much more abuse than the 25's.

Is that true? I have heard that the rb25 is not much stronger than the sr, but the 26 is about as strong as a 2jz.

How much of this is bs.

I personally thing the 25's are just as strong as the 26's but I maybe wrong, can anyone help?

Thanx


Isn't the record for 2JZ stock rods an crank 900hp? I haven't heard of any Stock RB26 goin that high. Maybe they have someone show me plz :)

User avatar
Nameless EJ6
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 9:24 pm
Car: What the **** do you think.

Post

Hey, try that search button thing. :/

Yes, it's true: (RB26DETT > RB25DET) < 2JZ

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

I love my RB and all, but stock block vs. stock block, the 2JZ has us beat.

User avatar
BoostFab
Posts: 3529
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 8:23 am
Car: S13cp, S13fb, S14z
Location: Nismo Land
Contact:

Post

if i can recall, there were an article on Turbo Magazine a few months back illustrating a Skyline with rb26dett pushing 700+hp, with an HKS single turbo on stock bottom-end.

Altiman94
Posts: 5891
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 12:13 pm
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

its all about tuning. Look at the ka24de stock bottom end running at 440-some hp

User avatar
Nameless EJ6
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 9:24 pm
Car: What the **** do you think.

Post

Altiman94 wrote:its all about tuning. Look at the ka24de stock bottom end running at 440-some hp


I'm looking but having a hard time finding it.

It's not all about tuning.. if that were true, there wouldn't be such a large aftermarket of stronger/better internals to build engines with.

User avatar
NISMO_RB25
Posts: 1066
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 4:40 am
Car: 1992 240SX with RB25DET, 1987 RX-7 TII

Post

scc had a 400hp turbo ka, but I think the guy was on his third motor. I have to agree that the 2jz is an awsome motor, but would you really want 900hp in your S13/S14?

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

NISMO_RB25 wrote:... but would you really want 900hp in your S13/S14?


No. I'm scared of 300 right now. :)

Edit: Here's that sick KA. It's not just stock bottom end, it's a stock long block, with 115k miles. No cams, no headwork, no rebuild, just a good tune and a nicely matched turbo. :)

User avatar
NISMO_RB25
Posts: 1066
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 4:40 am
Car: 1992 240SX with RB25DET, 1987 RX-7 TII

Post

that is pretty impressive for that motor. on second thought 400hp in just about anything is impressive :)

User avatar
Porschephile
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:38 am
Car: '98 Maxima
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post

BoostsFed wrote:if i can recall, there were an article on Turbo Magazine a few months back illustrating a Skyline with rb26dett pushing 700+hp, with an HKS single turbo on stock bottom-end.


It was a stock R33 gtr w/ a T51R SPL. It made 710rwhp and 529rwtq.

The rb26 is much stronger than the 25, but the 2jz is stronger over all. Why try and push the "stock block" barrier and risk blowing up expensive stuff? To me, personally, I find that to be a little idiotic. 2jz, rb26, etc they are all expensive engines. I'd rather build it right the first time and know I can handle the power, rather than playing Russian roulette with a boost controller and large turbo to figure out how much power blows your engine! IMO, the people that do that are just cheap b@stards! ;)

User avatar
PalmerWMD
Posts: 14329
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 3:14 pm
Car: 2004 350Z

Post

We have a lot of empricial input here to get a good sense of how much boost is safe with a given type of Mod(s).

Fred..:)

dareo
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:13 am
Car: 1993 Q45, 1989 240sx

Post

Please confirm or deny the RB25DET's weak pistons thing. I've read multiple places that the RB25DET can break pistons, ring lands i think, very easily. (like 300-400hp range) but replace the pistons and its good for a shload of HP.

RB26 has a better valvetrain, higher redline and possibly more advantages im leaving out here.

User avatar
NISMO_RB25
Posts: 1066
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 4:40 am
Car: 1992 240SX with RB25DET, 1987 RX-7 TII

Post

dareo wrote:Please confirm or deny the RB25DET's weak pistons thing. I've read multiple places that the RB25DET can break pistons, ring lands i think, very easily. (like 300-400hp range) but replace the pistons and its good for a shload of HP.

.


Here is an easy answer to that question. Search under fito:

He made 587HP @ 26psi on stock internals with his RB25 before breaking the rings.

That is more HP then I will ever need. At this point the only reason I would go RB26 is if I decide to go crazy and actually do AWD. I might even go AWD with the 25 and just use the 26 transmission. I haven't seen that done yet.

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

NISMO_RB25 wrote:Here is an easy answer to that question. Search under fito:

He made 587HP @ 26psi on stock internals with his RB25 before breaking the rings.

That is more HP then I will ever need. At this point the only reason I would go RB26 is if I decide to go crazy and actually do AWD. I might even go AWD with the 25 and just use the 26 transmission. I haven't seen that done yet.


Didn't he break them cause of over boosting on pump gas vs C16?

Siddhartha
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 6:56 am
Car: cars computers women martial arts

Post

Ummmm, the SR can be taken to over 400 safely on pump gas and stock internals....

User avatar
NISMO_RB25
Posts: 1066
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 4:40 am
Car: 1992 240SX with RB25DET, 1987 RX-7 TII

Post

Yellow4g63 wrote:Didn't he break them cause of over boosting on pump gas vs C16?


I am not sure, but it alteast proves that nearly 600 was achieved on stock internals with an RB25. That should be enought for most people, unless they are trying to build a dyno queen.

User avatar
eh?
Posts: 1781
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 2:26 pm

Post

Fito did not realize the rb25 CR was 9:1. I'm sure if he knew he wouldn't have used pump gas DOH.JMS already did 601rwhp so there should be no question about the RB25's stock strength. This talk about the 25 not being about to handle 400hp is nonsense.

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

eh? wrote:Fito did not realize the rb25 CR was 9:1. I'm sure if he knew he wouldn't have used pump gas DOH.JMS already did 601rwhp so there should be no question about the RB25's stock strength. This talk about the 25 not being about to handle 400hp is nonsense.


Yeah thats what I was thinking too.


Return to “RB20DET / RB25DET / RB26DETT Forum”