rb25det vs sr20det

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
Doomed2Walk
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:39 pm
Car: 2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi WRBP on gold
Contact:

Post

I swear when I was surfing around today, I saw that the price on a rb25det motorset was $3500 on the Mckinney website. If I can get the motorset for that price, should I go with the rb25 rather than the sr20? Someone please list pros and cons.


User avatar
Oatmealman
Posts: 5720
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 1:22 pm
Car: 2011 ford f150 fx4 5.0 master race
Location: Wisconsin

Post

pros of an rb25,fast,awd,turbo'd,

cons, lots of modification work that will take a while to complete,have to get new transmission,have to get skyline axles to handle the ponies and you rear wheel drive will be gone unless you leave the front drive shaft of the rbtrannie unhooked than it would be like havin a 500 pound friend sit on the hood while you drive,have to upgrade suspension.

Doomed2Walk
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:39 pm
Car: 2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi WRBP on gold
Contact:

Post

it's an rb25det off the r33 gts-t so it's rwd i believe.

User avatar
Oatmealman
Posts: 5720
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 1:22 pm
Car: 2011 ford f150 fx4 5.0 master race
Location: Wisconsin

Post

yeah maybe it is i can't remeber let me find out

User avatar
0range_240
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 9:55 pm
Car: 89 HCR32

Post

its out of the GTS-T so it would be RWD like doomed said. only the GT-R's were AWD.

I dont know what you mean by lots of "modifications" whether that be performance or installation, but all you really need for installation is motor mounts and a custom x-member. Also the RB25 transmission fits fine, its the RB26 that cannot be used.

And the RB doesnt weight very much more than a CA or SR so upgrading the suspension would not be nescessary unless of course it was to improve handling, not compensate for the weight. If he was talking about a VG30DETT that would be a different story.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

ghetto wrote:pros of an rb25,fast,awd,turbo'd,

cons, lots of modification work that will take a while to complete,have to get new transmission,have to get skyline axles to handle the ponies and you rear wheel drive will be gone unless you leave the front drive shaft of the rbtrannie unhooked than it would be like havin a 500 pound friend sit on the hood while you drive,have to upgrade suspension.


Dude, c'mon. I coulda swore we covered you being full of crap and not knowing wtf you're talking about. Please do us (and the eager noobs especially) a favor and disconnect your keyboard.

*Sigh* Now on to fixing the misinfo.

RB25 is RWD. The transmission will work fine. No axle upgrade is needed. A new driveshaft is, and probabaly motor mounts unless you wanna use the Xmember from the R33 and you have an S14, but I have personal experience with either. Your suspension will be fine.

There, I tried to correct what I could make out of what he typed. And that being said, just go SR. ;)

User avatar
0range_240
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 9:55 pm
Car: 89 HCR32

Post

I concur

*phew* So im not the only one who thinks he doesnt know anything? thats a relief, I was sort of suspicious by what he said in my post. an auto SL running a 15.9?? wow he must've had stickerz and nawzzzz

240DRFT
Posts: 4403
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:44 pm

Post

check out the rb forum. they have threads up about swaps always, they can help u out.

User avatar
PalmerWMD
Posts: 14329
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 3:14 pm
Car: 2004 350Z

Post

Doomed:

I am no expert and you might wish to check our RB engine forum as well, but most SME's say the install is much harder and time consuming for any RB vs an SR.

Also you will need new engine crossmembers ( McKinney has 'em).

And the harness will be much harder for an RB

Ultimately RB's have a greater potential than SR's but properly sorted SR's run as strong as 400 hp reliable, which is all I can think of ever needing.

RB will need less mods, to get to that level, and can go beyond easier, but again is a harder install that costs more $$ in parts and labor.

Again I am no expert but details can be had on our NICO RB forum where you will find some RB install threads if you look around be sure to read a few of those.

Fred...:)

User avatar
Oatmealman
Posts: 5720
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 1:22 pm
Car: 2011 ford f150 fx4 5.0 master race
Location: Wisconsin

Post

yes he was running nawzzz orange_240.

Doomed2Walk
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:39 pm
Car: 2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi WRBP on gold
Contact:

Post

haha thanks guys. i think i will stick with the SR, less trouble and all but i just wanted to stick out from the crowd a bit ;] yeah the part about the rb25s being awd kind of freaked me out a bit.

jEzTeR
Posts: 5224
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 2:34 pm
Car: '07 Infiniti FX35
'02 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
'93 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Contact:

Post

Nothing wron with wanting to stick out from the crowd. I say go for the RB so we will have more Skyline motors in the US.;)

Doomed2Walk
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:39 pm
Car: 2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi WRBP on gold
Contact:

Post

*sigh* if only money were NOT the main issue ;[

fito
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 4:27 pm

Post

Have you heard the sound of a RB25 engine at 8000 RPMs????

Don't, because if you do, you'll end up with one. believe me!swaping a RB, honestly it's not that hard .

User avatar
NotDave
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:57 am
Car: 96 240sx that needs paint

Post

dont forget about the RB20. it can be had for 1200 and doesn't require mounts or a driveshaft. just a lil trimming or shimming of the hood and a lil grinding of the downpipe(sometimes).

rb250sx
Posts: 292
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 4:32 pm
Car: '89 s13 w/ RB25DET
'07 Nissan Frontier
'14 Jeep Rubicon

Post

The RB swap really isnt that complicated at all, the engine looks like a monster in the bay, it sounds like a beast even at idle, and its well worth a little extra coin. check out the RB forum and click on the stickey for 8 step wiring. scroll to the bottom of open sources post where he has a link to him starting his rb25, that should settle your decision. Also the rb forum is full of info on the swap, you will find your help there.

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

No doubt, that sounds awesome!!!Wish i had some dough to throw at one of those! even if i sold my sileighty i couldnt come up with 5K...

turtl631
Posts: 790
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 7:30 am
Car: S14

Post

Yeah I've been reading a lot of info about this and if not for my parents refusing to let me swap, I'd be tempted by the RB20. It fits more easily than the other RBs but still has that nice high redline...and its a 6 :) Duh!

180fan
Posts: 7799
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 12:16 pm
Car: 89 fastback

Post

dunno about the point of having a 6 banger that's only a 2.0L though. If you're gonna do an RB, do the 25.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

^ummm, the install cost of rb20 vs rb25. for the extra $600+ (driveshaft, mounts) it costs to install the RB25, you can start modifying the RB20.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

IWannaS15 wrote:^ummm, the install cost of rb20 vs rb25. for the extra $600+ (driveshaft, mounts) it costs to install the RB25, you can start modifying the RB20.


Please stop applying logic for those who can't do it themsselves--just let them go SR. :)

User avatar
rico05
Posts: 6895
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 6:52 am
Car: 1992 RMS13 w/ CA18DET
Contact:

Post

According to sport compact car. the RB25DET that they swapped into an S14 was 180lbs more portly than the KA. Neither engine had accessories on it, but had trannys. That is like having your buddy sitting on your engine as you drive. No big deal for straight line, but for handling I bet it is a pain to compensate for. I am a big fan of light, stout, powerful 4s myself.

User avatar
eh?
Posts: 1781
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 2:26 pm

Post

rico05 wrote:According to sport compact car. the RB25DET that they swapped into an S14 was 180lbs more portly than the KA. Neither engine had accessories on it, but had trannys. That is like having your buddy sitting on your engine as you drive. No big deal for straight line, but for handling I bet it is a pain to compensate for. I am a big fan of light, stout, powerful 4s myself.
The biggest reason why it's 180lbs more is because of the larger much more stronger tranmission. That's a plus over the SR,KA and RB20.

[Zero-S]
Posts: 5295
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 10:56 am
Car: Tell me whats wrong with this picture. 3 240's, only one runs.

Post

0range_240 wrote:I concur

*phew* So im not the only one who thinks he doesnt know anything? thats a relief, I was sort of suspicious by what he said in my post. an auto SL running a 15.9?? wow he must've had stickerz and nawzzzz


My auto SL ran 16.8 in economy mode. Pos.

Doomed2Walk
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:39 pm
Car: 2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi WRBP on gold
Contact:

Post

yeah, SLs are teh sux.

User avatar
PantherRacer
Posts: 9408
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:32 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan Skyline R32 RB20DET Sedan
Location: The Moorish Throne of Atlantis
Contact:

Post

so, RB and SR=good, I really don't give a damn as long as I can get one...so how do you balance the suspension to try and even out the weight difference of the RB?

& one thing I always wanted to know...is there an awd 240/silvia? can there be? and how (if so) I think I saw somtthing about it but can't find it (if I really did see it)


Return to “240sx General Discussion”