Post by
karay240 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/karay240-u11860.html
Mon Apr 12, 2004 9:04 pm
Why do you say that? Wouldn't you rather have a stable car? It's a proven fact that, if everything else is equal, the wider and longer wheel base, the more stability it has. On the other hand, the car with the shorter and narrower wheel base is going to be better at tight low speed cornering. Last time I checked the chassis of the S13 and 14 are pretty similar. Of course, there are ways of getting around this (different alignment, wide body, wider wheel etc), but if you do that w/ an already wider car, won't you end up where you started?
Why do you think it is that you don't see that many miata sized production cars with insane amounts of power with a 180mph+ top speed? The miata is a great car on a tight course (ex. autox), but even if you tuned the miata to 300hp I'd rahter drive a stock rx7 on a higher speed road course. And yes, you're right, compared to the rx7, the miata is rather pedesrian, and you could argue that the rx7 was made for that kinda stuff. But then, why didn't Mazda make the rx7 with a shorter and narrower wheel base if it would make it lighter? Just a thought. . .