well considering a 350z clutch is meant for a car with about 700-800 pounds more weight than a 240 I'd assume the stock clutch in a ka-t should be able to handle alot more abuse than in a 350z.480sx wrote:The limit is whatever the said clutch is rated for. You can find that information online.
Why would you go to all the trouble of getting a rb flywheel then not go for an aftermarket clutch? You can get OEM feel with a much higher max tq rating out of one.
Not really, the clutch is going to hold the same ammount of TQ as it would in a 350.kazuma wrote:
well considering a 350z clutch is meant for a car with about 700-800 pounds more weight than a 240 I'd assume the stock clutch in a ka-t should be able to handle alot more abuse than in a 350z.
see the problem with this is that the white bunny setup can use a stock 280z clutch with a d21 flywheel(which is smaller than a rb20) and can handle gobs and gobs of tq. so why wouldnt a bigger flywheel clutch setup be able to do the same?480sx wrote:
Not really, the clutch is going to hold the same ammount of TQ as it would in a 350.
Thank you for clearing that up for me480sx wrote:Your not going to increase a clutches ability to hold TQ simply by increasing the size of the flywheel. The clutches mating(clamping, whatever) surface itself is only but so big.
One reason the swaps are so desirable is that with the 350 clutch or the 280, you have a larger clamping surface. This means that you dont have to have a racing puck style clutch to hold a lot of TQ as you would with the smaller flywheel/clutch of a 240. All the flywheel swap is doing is allowing you to use said clutch.
which clutch are you running WD?WDRacing wrote:My SPEC is rated at 450 ft lbs and drives like stock...peddle feel is soft enough for my wife to drive in heavy traffic and had no slippage at 20psi in 3rd, 4th and 5th WOT pulls.
So I can understand if you're saving a bunch of money, but other then that, why would you use a mix matched setup?
WD
+1SeanC wrote:
which clutch are you running WD?