midnight brother wrote:whats ford 9 inch rear. i must say you have turned my head matt and will do some googlin tonight for some more info about these engines
im 18 and yes i know what C16 is, if you have a problem iwth my age you should keep it to yourself, bringing the age of a legal adult into a convo against him is a pathetic excuse when your a moron and just trying to help yourself. You act like your some aged knowledge box, yet judging by your pic, you look the same age as me, and your certainly smaller than me. So I'd shut your mouth and not call people kid, when you dont even know them. Prick.mattback wrote:Actually Steph Nic, C16 is racing gasoline. But you didn't know that either. And the cost of an RB swap will be for a stockish RB26. You will reach the limits of its fuel system and turbos very quickly with just that stock motor. A Twinturbo Z with 10k dollars of work done to it will run 11s with 10 second mph's. That is if someone who actually worked wiht the motors like me worked on it. The typical ricer with 10k will not know the proper mods to do and end up making it a 12 second car with high 11 second mph. Which is still very respectable but not fast enough.
WHat's wrong with using a 9inch rear?? It's how you get traction. All the fast rear wheel drive imports such as the toyota solaras by bullish racing and the turbonetics celica are running 9inch rears. is there a problem with them ? what makes them so F***ing dumb ?? It's called using the parts that work.
you know those are American turbochargers on your japanese engines, thats right garrett is part of honeywell and honeywell is in the usa. So they might as well just be pieces of F***king sh*t because theyre using american parts in the first place.
Give me a break kid, how old are you , 18??
Lost_To_A_K-Car wrote:Give me a break kid, how old are you , 18??
Um, mattback? I don't mean to butt in here, but...I've seen pictures of you - aren't you, like, 11?
I mean, this is not the grizzled countenance of a world-weary 35 or 40 year old.
Don't let Stephen get so far under your skin. He's a troll.
mattback wrote:i am 21 years old. i've spent the last 4 years workingon and wrenching on imports and more specifically VG30s. there's a reason i work at a tuning garage and not just a rice shop. i am not trying to come across as an *******, just show people that the VG motor can make power also.
Lost_To_A_K-Car wrote:Check the link, troll:
'2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." '
Sound familiar?
Every conversation in which you're involved quickly degenerates into a profane, name-calling shouting match. Well, at least your side of it does. Even when people try to reason with you, you reply with nothing but ad hominem insults and poorly-worded flames.
No learning, no exchange of information, nothing. Troll.
You're 18 now. Start acting like an adult.
mattback wrote:C16 is gasoline by the way.
Lost_To_A_K-Car wrote:Originally posted by StephNic "]your unintelligent and stupid k-car.
*snort*
If you go look back at any posts I've made (And id like you to quote any one that involves me starting something)
I don't really think that's necessary. You've already shown yourself to be generally angry with the world, and quick to jump down the throats of those who disagree with you.
As far as I can tell, you're incapable of having a reasonable disagreement with anyone. As soon as anyone challenges your position, you leap immediately to attack mode, never considering for a moment that they may have a valid point.
You'r a loser, get a life.
...said the 18 year old boy.
I could care less if you'r a moderator either, you'r a waste of my time with you'r pathetic remarks.
And yet, you continue to waste your time responding to me.
You don't know what I think,
No, but I imagine it's something along the lines of "mmm, donuts".
I purposely start crap
So, you admit that you intentionally fly off the handle with people?
I'm glad we can finally agree on something.
*plonk*
mattback wrote:im nor arguing which motor is better for a 240, i'm just saying that a VG30 will make the same, if not more power than a rb if you put the same amount of love into it. it has .4 liters on it. you can make the vg's 3.2 - 3.5 liters easily also. it is VERY hard to overcome that kind of displacement increase. Ive seen many 600 hp Z32s with stock intake AND exhaust manifolds on also.
mattback wrote:exactly. you'll tak ehte rb, but you give the vg credit.
i just can't stand the kids in here that think a VG with good tuning will get absolutely walked by an rb..