

http://www.spoolimports.com/billet-oil- ... pump-gears
I haven't emailed them about it yet, I was just bumping around the web page and I saw it. They have them for the N1 pump too.


Did something happen to the old motor?StricNyne wrote:def gonna need that for the 30 build
StricNyne wrote:nope selling it though, i picked up a 26 head, buIilding it, and waiting for my 30 block to build that and drop it in over weekend

As much as I would love a cheaper solution for a high rpm pump to Greddy/Jun/external etc, I still have reservations. First off, I'm not sure I would trust the quality of a part from a manufacturer when they call a sintered part made from "powdered metal."Yellow4g63 wrote:Got a email back from them, they say you can take to 10,000rpm.
You're right about the crank -> oil pump drive being the #1 issue (for R32's), but when you're talking about getting a different oil pump over stock you should already have a collar or R33 crank installed. But since Yellow4g63 stated that the set of gears in question are to prevent high rpm failures, I thought I would chime in with some engineering opinions on why I wouldn't bother.Shocker wrote:From research of the failed RB oil pumps it seems to be more related to pump drive to collar slop that's the real killer. Keeping the stock pump around stock RPM I havent seen to many people have problems with that. (actually none that I have seen). I run an N1 pump with an extended drive keeping my revs to 7k.. so far so good.
I'm not referring to the length of the collar, I 'm referring to if you took a cross-section view of the crank collar with the oil pump in the view. The gap/distance from the "ID" of the pump drive to the "OD" of the collar is the main issue. If the two features are a more "line to line" fit, they essentially are one as they spin, with minimal slop between them - preventing wearing/pump gear breakage since they are always spinning at almost an identical rate. This eliminates the "jack-hammer" effect when hitting a rev-limit, anti-lag, boost cut w/e it may be that seems to break gears.julio wrote:You're right about the crank -> oil pump drive being the #1 issue (for R32's), but when you're talking about getting a different oil pump over stock you should already have a collar or R33 crank installed. But since Yellow4g63 stated that the set of gears in question are to prevent high rpm failures, I thought I would chime in with some engineering opinions on why I wouldn't bother.Shocker wrote:From research of the failed RB oil pumps it seems to be more related to pump drive to collar slop that's the real killer. Keeping the stock pump around stock RPM I havent seen to many people have problems with that. (actually none that I have seen). I run an N1 pump with an extended drive keeping my revs to 7k.. so far so good.
Ah ok, well perhaps I didn't give you enough credit then because I've never heard someone else bring this issue up. Fixing this would certainly help and I'm not even sure the FSM has a clearance limit for this either.Shocker wrote:I'm not referring to the length of the collar, I 'm referring to if you took a cross-section view of the crank collar with the oil pump in the view. The gap/distance from the "ID" of the pump drive to the "OD" of the collar is the main issue. If the two features are a more "line to line" fit, they essentially are one as they spin, with minimal slop between them - preventing wearing/pump gear breakage since they are always spinning at almost an identical rate. This eliminates the "jack-hammer" effect when hitting a rev-limit, anti-lag, boost cut w/e it may be that seems to break gears.