RB and SRDET

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
batty
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:28 pm

Post

What are the major differences between these two engine types. The RB and the SRDET. Obvious they are from different cars. Skyline RB and the Silvia for the SRDET but whats the differences in reliability and engine in internals. I am ready to purchase a S15 motor but i want to make sure its the best choice for me (engine , reliability and mod friendly wise).


User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

SR == 4 banger, turbo, all aluminum engine. Came in the Silvias and the 180s. It's a good stout little engine with forged internals from the factory. There were three generations of the engine the S13 had a high flow head and a T-25 turbo. The S14 and S15 motors came with a low port head, but had VTC integrated into the intake cam. They both had T-28 turbos. They also had a revised water pump and oil pump design that improved cooling effeciency of the motor. The S14 had the strongest transmission of the group, and the S15 came with a relatively weaker 6 speed transmission. The S13 and S14 motors came with 370cc injectors and the S15 had been bumped up to a size that I can't remember.

Any SR is reliable up to 450 horsepower on the stock bottom end. I think secret services was pushing nearly 500 on the stock bottom end not too long ago.

The RB is an inline 6 motor that came in 3 sizes. 2.0 liter, 2.5 liter, and a 2.6 liter. The 2.0 liter was found in the cefiro and had one T-28 turbo. The 2.5 liter was found in the base skyline with a single turbo. The 2.6 was the GT-R's engine and came mated to a 6 speed, AWD transmission and had dual turbo setup. The RB is definitely a more stout block than an SR due to it's cast iron make (aluminum head), and takes to modifications easier than an SR. If I were building a car for straight line performance, an RB would be choice.

batty
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:28 pm

Post

very good information thank you.

batty
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:28 pm

Post

i am looking for decent power some in 300whp range. use for track and drift . Just a little undecided right. s15 seems like a good choice

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

The SR is very capable of 300, especially the S15 (if you can wire it), plus it's easier to fit than an RB.

S15 SR's had 400 somthing CC injectors.RB20DET's came in R32 Skylines, Cefiros, and Z31 200ZR's.RB25DET's came in R33 and R34 SKylines. (and the Stagea, but we won't get into that pimpster)RB26DETT came in the R32-R34 Skyline models with slight changes between each.

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

300 HP is very attainable on any nissan engine. The only thing I don't like about S15 motors is how much they cost. You will plunk down a lot of change on that motor set. Also wiring it is very hard. I haven't found a complete wiring diagram for it yet.

Blake: I'm digging tah_Hammer. He's dancing to dirtty vegas perfectly right now :)

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

Can't touch it.

User avatar
D1SR240
Posts: 3232
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 11:55 am
Car: 2002 BMW M5
1991 Nissan 240SX

Post

S15 SR has 480cc injectors. Can anyone actually prove that the six speed S15 transmission is weaker, I have heard quite a few times that it is, but have never actually seen anything notable to that theory. So if anyone can actually prove why it is weaker please let me know.

240kindaguy
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:24 pm

Post

hey, i dont actually own a 240 but have been studying them for quite some time. for 300rwhp straight lines and drifting i would go with the s-14 if an engine swap is what you are doing. However, save yourself a little time without your car and just turbo your ka, they have displacement on the sr and its around the same to turbo the ka as it is to swap.

240kindaguy
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:24 pm

Post

http://www.xatracing.com/RB_SWAP_info.html

i found this, maybe it will help you.

240kindaguy
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:24 pm

Post

i found this, maybe it will help you.

http://www.xatracing.com/RB_SWAP_info.html

MECPInstaller
Posts: 811
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
Car: installing stereo systems and minor performance upgrades

Post

the six speed transmission weaker is new to me to. Would love to learn more about it. Also how come the s15 sr is so hard to wire compared to its earlier models? Back when I was going to do a swap I was really intrested in the s15 engine because of the six speed transmission and increased stock power output.

240kindaguy
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:24 pm

Post

april 2004 car of the month has the turbo ka and obviously it works.

easymmkay240sx
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 6:55 am

Post

Why would an RB only be good for straight line? PSshaw. Ever seen an RB25 powered S13 in action? I have and it's just plain awesome. I believe someone had done some corner-weighing with an RB25 vs stock a while back and it hardly dented the weight distribution.

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

MECPInstaller wrote:the six speed transmission weaker is new to me to. Would love to learn more about it. Also how come the s15 sr is so hard to wire compared to its earlier models? Back when I was going to do a swap I was really intrested in the s15 engine because of the six speed transmission and increased stock power output.
Nissan crammed a 6 speed gearset into the same size gearbox as the 5 speed. The gears got cut a bit thinner, IIRC. The S14 is considered the strongest because it got slightly beefier bearings and synchros than the S13.

S15s are hard to wire into S13s because of ODB2. If you've ever noticed, it's harder to wire in engines that do not match up to the generation of the chassis.

MECPInstaller
Posts: 811
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
Car: installing stereo systems and minor performance upgrades

Post

ahh thanks for shedding some light on that, good info.

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

easymmkay240sx wrote:Why would an RB only be good for straight line? PSshaw. Ever seen an RB25 powered S13 in action? I have and it's just plain awesome. I believe someone had done some corner-weighing with an RB25 vs stock a while back and it hardly dented the weight distribution.


Ok. Do this. Go get 180 pounds worth of weights and find someway to anchor them in your engine bay. Now, take the car and try to flog it. The car will definitely be front biased in weight distribution. That will help in activities that you want weight transfer to happen (drag and drift) but on a road course, a lighter, more even distributed car will own an RB powered 240.

MikeLHP
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 10:38 pm
Car: going to the races @ the track, studying for mechanical engineering, havcing fun, helping others out

Post

i cant say how long ive been wrenching on 240's and quite some time with the SR as well the RB. it just depends on the person. though if I had a nickel for everytime this was asked I would have enough to pay off my tuition. lol.

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

MikeLHP wrote:i cant say how long ive been wrenching on 240's and quite some time with the SR as well the RB. it just depends on the person. though if I had a nickel for everytime this was asked I would have enough to pay off my tuition. lol.


If I had a nickel for everytime I've SEEN an SR v RB thread, I'd be rich.

But I agree, the ultimate decision rests in the person and what he thinks will suit him best. If you can get a chance to sample what a swapped car can do (for any of the swaps), then you'd be ableto make the perfect choice for what you want. I get kids asking me all the time if they should put an SR in their 240. What I do is take them out somewhere, let them drive around and come up with their oqn conclusions.

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

easymmkay240sx wrote:Why would an RB only be good for straight line? PSshaw. Ever seen an RB25 powered S13 in action? I have and it's just plain awesome. I believe someone had done some corner-weighing with an RB25 vs stock a while back and it hardly dented the weight distribution.


Don't confuse cornerweighting and actual static weight balance.

With adjustable coilovers you can lower the rear to redistribute excess frontal weight to the rear. With enough adjustments you can effectively cornerweight an RB powered S13 quite easily.

However cornerweighting doesn't eliminate the added weight from the RB engine, nor does it eliminate the requirement for adequate suspension travel. So in the long run cornerweighting only attempts to minimize the effects of the added weight, but does not make it equal. It is silly to think that an RB powered S13 will ever be equal with an SR powered S13, ceteris paribus. To do so would be to deny the estabolishment of physics and reality.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

Ok, why didn't I gets to drive it when you was here?! *cry*

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

SeVa-S13 wrote:Ok, why didn't get to drive it when you was here?! *cry*


English, do you speak it? :D

[Zero-S]
Posts: 5295
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 10:56 am
Car: Tell me whats wrong with this picture. 3 240's, only one runs.

Post

:owned

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

SeVa-S13 wrote:Ok, why didn't get to drive it when you was here?! *cry*


i hope that was aimed at me :)

and the answer. Cause you were too lazy to get it running while i was there :)

EDIT: if that was to ask why you didn't get to drive my car. I was in a hurry to go get drunk at Kristen's friend's birthday party.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

tenkawa_akito wrote:EDIT: if that was to ask why you didn't get to drive my car. I was in a hurry to go get drunk at Kristen's friend's birthday party.


Bingo.

What ain't no country I ever heard of.

User avatar
PantherRacer
Posts: 9408
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:32 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan Skyline R32 RB20DET Sedan
Location: The Moorish Throne of Atlantis
Contact:

Post

I'll jess leave dis one alone lol

User avatar
D1SR240
Posts: 3232
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 11:55 am
Car: 2002 BMW M5
1991 Nissan 240SX

Post

tenkawa_akito wrote:Nissan crammed a 6 speed gearset into the same size gearbox as the 5 speed. The gears got cut a bit thinner, IIRC. The S14 is considered the strongest because it got slightly beefier bearings and synchros than the S13.


Thank you for the info tenkawa-akito. But if it is the same size then why can't it bolt up to an S13 or S14 SR engine. Also sinve the S14 transmission is stronger than the S13 one can the S14 transmission bolt up to the S13 SR?

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

I thought the S15 bellhousing shared the same bolt patterns as the other generation SRs. I've heard of people (never actually seen it first hand) swapping S14 trannies over to their S15 blocks. My friend has an S15 block sitting in his garage, so I'll take a look one day at the bolt pattern and compare it to an S13.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”