but, how do you know until you try...but yea they all do the same thing but I have RAYS lugnuts while you just have motegi...as well as rims, you just have the run of the mill FNO1-RC while I have WORK TM-1 TERMIST...they do the same thing but mines looks better...ddgsxr504 wrote:That's what you get for buying $100+ lug nuts.
I completely agree with the old saying that you get what you pay for but there are somethings that just aren't worth the money regardless.
I bought a set of 20 Red locking key lugs from Mutegi for about $30, no problems yet.
All I can say is sorry? Oh yeah and....
OWNED
My run of the mil FN's... $350navajo_drifter wrote:
but, how do you know until you try...but yea they all do the same thing but I have RAYS lugnuts while you just have motegi...as well as rims, you just have the run of the mill FNO1-RC while I have WORK TM-1 TERMIST...they do the same thing but mines looks better...
but also you gotta look at the weight of these lugnuts...thats essentially what your paying for, the rays, i am almost 100% sure are lighter than your motegi's. a lot of what i buy is for performance gains...there are the occasional items that do nothing in terms of performance but when i can make form meet function, I do...and some people are not broke and looking for money with the ability to afford lugnuts like that...its the same concept as someone buying some dymag wheels...yea they are 2000 dollars a pop and will help the performance of the car but if you cant drive and take advantage of it, its pointless. this is the point I hope your trying to convey because the fact of the matter is, some people are loaded, and money is no matter.ddgsxr504 wrote:
Besides I said nothing about your wheels anyway, no $hit that Works are better than FN's I'm so sorry that you don't like the fact that I don't agree with paying stupid amounts of money for lug nuts.
I completely agree, you are paying for the weight reduction, but.... how much of a reductioin do you actually loose in terms of unsprung weight??navajo_drifter wrote:
but also you gotta look at the weight of these lugnuts...thats essentially what your paying for, the rays, i am almost 100% sure are lighter than your motegi's. a lot of what i buy is for performance gains...there are the occasional items that do nothing in terms of performance but when i can make form meet function
Again, where form can meet function, this is the best route...but by lowering the weight of any centripetal mass, you essentially free up 2.5 hp from the motor, but when you lower the weight on the rotating mass of the wheel, you not only accelerate faster you brake faster, also have faster turn in, and I, myself, like any extra help you can get. I believe it was a good buy...considering the slight if even noticble gains.ddgsxr504 wrote:
I guess since I am not a baller such as your self I don't see the point of buying something just because I can afford it.
The price vs function is not anywhere close, $100 to lose 3 pounds? There are far more places to shave those 3 pounds of weight off your car.navajo_drifter wrote:Again, where form can meet function, this is the best route
This makes no sense what so ever. Plus I think you meant to use a different word.navajo_drifter wrote:but by lowering the weight of any centripetal mass, you essentially free up 2.5 hp from the motor
It's called unsprung weight, you can lose 5lbs of unsprung weight by removing your brake dust shields off your spindles. That's 2 pounds more than the lug nuts and best of all..... it's free!navajo_drifter wrote:but when you lower the weight on the rotating mass of the wheel, you not only accelerate faster you brake faster, also have faster turn in, and I, myself, like any extra help you can get. I believe it was a good buy...considering the slight if even noticble gains.
word, or get your girlfriend to go on a diet. you'll feel more of a difference.ddgsxr504 wrote:
It's called unsprung weight, you can lose 5lbs of unsprung weight by removing your brake dust shields off your spindles. That's 2 pounds more than the lug nuts and best of all..... it's free!
I said FORM to function...not price...so it looks good and works the way it was intended. and i do agree there are more places to shave weight but the lugnuts is the place i was doing it. where FORM(looks) met function...ddgsxr504 wrote:
The price vs function is not anywhere close, $100 to lose 3 pounds? There are far more places to shave those 3 pounds of weight off your car.
the formula i used was from unorthodox...at the crank is also what i assume they were talking bout...maybe it was like 5 lbs of rotating mass to 2.5hp...im not 100% sure. and I meant to use centripetal...GOOGLE it...ddgsxr504 wrote:
This makes no sense what so ever. Plus I think you meant to use a different word.
The actual formula (persay) is for every 100lbs you lose it frees up 1 WHP.
the dust sheild doesnt rotate...rotating mass causes centripetal force which makes things harder to accelerate, or brake than just the extra weight of something that doesnt rotate.ddgsxr504 wrote:
It's called unsprung weight, you can lose 5lbs of unsprung weight by removing your brake dust shields off your spindles. That's 2 pounds more than the lug nuts and best of all..... it's free!
^that is more of what i was going for when i posted this thread, to see if anyone else had this problem, or any possible solutions...maybe somebody knows you cant tap the rays lugnuts...maybe, i overlooked something...maybe i did a slight problem...many variables, but not unnecessary comments like, im sorry, OWNED and BS like that...and because of the smart guy (srpowered240sx) im goin get some hubcentric rings and try that, it may not work but it is a good suggestion, that i havent thought about! Thanks!srpowered240sx wrote:
word, or get your girlfriend to go on a diet. you'll feel more of a difference.
id say try to hit your lug nuts with a 12x1.25 tap, and see if you can clean them up enough, but personally, i wouldnt use aluminum lug nuts once they have stripped. go buy a set of wheel locks, and use those to replace the booggered up ones. also, it sounds like you need some hubcentric rings, or to hold your wheel up more centered when tossing lugs on. you should be able to run them to the bottom without resistance by hand.
Oh man, justifying paying $100 + for lugnuts for perfmance benefit made me LOL. I hope you know that the closer a mass is to the centre of rotation, the smaller the impact it has on rotional inerta. Your lug nuts make very close to 0 difference. And I mean very close. I was driving for a day missing a lugnut on each wheel, and it did not make any sort of noticeable difference on vibration or anything like that. Try and buy the lightest weight performance tire that you can. That will make a bigger difference that the tiny savings on lug nuts.navajo_drifter wrote:
the dust sheild doesnt rotate...rotating mass causes centripetal force which makes things harder to accelerate, or brake than just the extra weight of something that doesnt rotate.
Hahaha. At least I had some fresh information to add. Knocking down his whole "centripedal force" theory.ddgsxr504 wrote:Took you guys long enough to chime in.....
It's all good, I have red lugs and red valve capsgumby74 wrote:Besides, the blue matches my valve stems. I am a ricer I know I know...but think of the performance gainshahahahahahah.
What? That's the silliest thing I've ever heard. Maybe if you have a piece of crap $20 torque wrench should you not use it.thenillaz wrote:Honestly toqueing bolts to the spec isnt always the best way to do it, as you can see. I torque bolts depending on the material and thinkness of the bolt and nut. If you do it carefully by feel, you know when you're going to reach the breaking point of the nut and bolt. In you're situation the new lug nuts couldn't handle 100ft/lb of torque you were putting on them so they broke. Simple as that. You should depend on your sense of feel and observation when torqueing nuts and bolts sometimes rather than a torque stick or wrench.