Darkness is a great game in general. The story just got you really into the action. I would have to say the game is just amazing. The graphics are better than what could be expected from a game (not as good a Bioshock, but not many things are). Among FPS Darkness is one of the best. The way it gets you into the game from the beginning and keeps you in your seat the whole way.R240sx wrote:Why did you like the darkness?? i'd was thinking of picking it up but just was alittle wary since i havnt heard much about it.
lol your the only person i think that gave bioshock below 9, which i think its fair considering no online!
Now there is where you are VERY WRONG. In your analogy you say a 350z shouldn't be marked down because it doesn't have a 3rd row seat. Well was the 350z built on a platform that was meant to have a 3rd row seat? NO. Bioshock was built on a platform that is all about multiplayer. The 360 would have flopped by now if it wasn't for Xbox Live. See you have to understand why I am saying things such as this instead of putting you own spin on it. I think Bioshock is a great game aside from it being short and lacking the one thing that has put to 360 so far above the Wii (aside from the name, still think they should have kept the name Revolution), and PS3. Now if you wish to discuss this further I will be happy to but please make a new topic because this is for reviews only. Thank You and I do appreciate you taking the time to read my reviews.MinisterofDOOM wrote:I definitely disagree very very strongly that lack of multiplayer should negatively impact Bioshock's score. Bioshock isn't a multiplayer game. I hate the mindset that all games should have multiplayer. That's like marking down a 350z because it doesn't have third row seats.
I really don't understand why people think every single game should have a multi-player aspect.