KillerAngel wrote:Rob: Is there a reason you made it rich down low and lean up high? Not sure im following that...
Great info btw... you guys are awesome ;-)
It's the opposite. "down low" i.e. idle & cruise, is bottom left. 'up high' power area is upper right.
Here's the RPM scale:
68006200570053004900440040003600320028002250215016001200800400
And the load (TP = Theoretical Pulsewidth) scale:8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 72
I do all my tuning with a wideband O2 sensor, so I've never really looked at EGTs. I know it's way more critical with turbo cars.
I was going to do some more dyno time this week (I always use a load-cell dyno, NOT an inertial dyno) to tune, but I loaned the Q to my dad and now it's 400 miles away. I'm driving his old Dodge truck so I think he got the better end of that deal.
When I do get around to dynoing it again I will post the numbers. Last time I almost got to 270 at the wheels.
Oh, and as far as the above tables go, they are not EXACTLY what you see out the tailpipe. There are other correction factors out there that have to be turned off to do the AFR table tuning.
One good thing with the 94-95 ECUs is that they have a separate VE table that I do not tweak. The AFRs are much closer to actual.
The 90-93 ECUs do not have a VE table, so all the "fudging" occurs in the fuel tables. They do not always reflect actual AFR.
Incidentally that is also why in the above RPM scale, there is a weird spacing between 2000 and 3000 rpm. THe "pinched' portion of the scale is there to compensate for a VE dip in the stock engine.