Post by
AOE_Danny »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/aoe-danny-u20654.html
Fri Feb 25, 2005 8:51 am
Thanks for the information! He's my replies, mainly in chronological order:--------------"Thats alot of questions to be asking in 1 thread."
Errm, yea, you're right; I probably should have split it up into a few more concise posts --------------"The 26 trans however does not use the same clutch as a 20/25 because the 20/25 is a push type clutch while the 26 is a pull type. Good luck with that one."
Humm... I had thought that only the R34 used the "pull-type" clutch; do ALL of the AWD trannies really use the "pull-type"?
What about the R32's AWD transmission: Is that a "pull-type" as well?
(Also, once again: are the GTS-4 and GT-R trannies different?)--------------"an RB trans WILL NOT bolt up to a SR. You could try using a an adapterplate, once again good luck."
I fully expected to need an adapter plate, but I wanted to make sure; now I know. Thanks!--------------"If you are going to get a awd trans then get the r32. its less complicated, less wiring. All models run the Attessa system but the r33 and 34 run electronic systems while the r32 is hydraulic and runs off pumps in the truck I believe, and I also believe they the pumps run the hicas also... not sure."
Humm... It would seem that the information I had must have been talking about the R32. I had thought that R34 was the "electrical" one and R33 was the "Mechanical" one; Guess I was wrong. Yes, I definitely want the mechanical setup, so let's change it to an R32 transmission, not R33. Thanks for pointing this out! (BTW, the "trunk" pump was what I had in mind, so we're definitely talking about the same setup now)--------------"The only way you are going to find specs on the transmission like pressures is to find an engineer who designed it."
... or by tapping and gauging a line, assuming the pressure isn't TOO high. If possible though, I'd much rather use the R32's stock trunk pump and deal with an electric signal instead if I can. I don't want a massive amount of electric work (i.e. R34), but sometimes some is easier then the alternative.--------------This is a much more trivial matter, but does anyone know what the drivetrain efficiency of the GTR is? I'm guessing somewhere around 20% drivetrain losses between the crank and the wheels; maybe even as bad as 25%. Does anyone know?--------------"You gonna have to cut your floor board out possibly take out the seat or make one hell of a custom bracket. You are going to have to use gtr front suspension, cut your cross member, cut this and that, than you are gonna have to wire it all up."
I intended to use the GTR Suspension, and more or less expected to have to do something custom with the crossmember [and probably transmission mount]. It's nice to have this confirmed though.
Now, in regards to "cutting out your floorboard and possibly the seat", I expect to have to cut the floorboard somewhat there; I can move the seat if I have to as well, as long as it doesn't stick in TOO far...
How far does the transmission really stick out? And does it stick out directly next to the shift knob, or up closer to the front of the car?
Also, on the R32 GTR transmission, how many wires really do run from the transmission?Speed Sensor of course, perhaps some type of crank sensor on the flywheel, and maybe a few diagnostic sensors (i.e. oil temp), but is there anything else significant?--------------Lastly: I got an e-mail that someone else replied to this post, but I don't see their post here ... ? Anyway, it was in regards to the front drive axle/differential being part of the oil pan (they weren't sure though, so it really didn't tell me much). Could anyone confirm/elaborate on this? How much of the oil pan is a "critical part" of the differential? Assuming the oil pan was cut off of the transmission, could a highly-custom oil pan work, or would the differential case, etc. be completely in the way of the oil pan mount bolts?
Also, is the R32 AWD transmission and different in this respect?--------------"why spend all the time and money of awd and then run an sr20? makes no sense to me."
and
"another one....what's good with the awd conversion, anyways? most people disable it for rwd power. i guess just something to waste money and time on."
Since it seems many of you still don't see the purposes of this swap, I'll spend a little time to elaborate on it (if you're not one of these people, you don't have to read the rest of this post). Please, I'm not trying to flame anyone - positive criticism is good, especially in the motorsports industry where few people know all they should about what they're trying to do/talking about doing. Here, I'm explaining my reasons for wanting to do this swap. I have Three main reasons for this swap project:
1. The SR20DET, an Inline 4 engine, costs a FRACTION as much on maintenance/rebuild as the RB25/26, an Inline 6 engine. Don't get me wrong, I'm a very big fan of the skyline engine; but that also means I know how much parts for it cost. I could upgrade my whole bottom end (using the stock crankshaft) for what it would cost you for a good set of upgraded connecting rods; add a good set of upgraded pistons for you, and I could rebuild my head as well for the same price. As they say, "It all comes down to cost and availability". If you then want to get into availability, SR20 parts are infinitely easier to find stateside then Skyline parts. This is the main reason I'm trying to use an SR20 instead of an RB25/26.
2. Just turn the boost up on the stock SR20DET w/ stock turbo (with just a few supporting mods, like fuel pump & injectors, FMIC, etc.) you can make 320-350 Crank HP. In an RWD setup (i.e. 240SX), this is like 300 to 320 to the wheels; that's MORE then enough to break the [stock] tires loose in the first three gears whenever you build boost. What point is that? All that wheelspin would be KILLING your 1/4 mile times. Yes, you'd loose some top-end due to the added drivetrain losses of an AWD, but you'd come out of the hole so much harder and faster it would way more then make up for it. As for big wide drag slicks on an RWD 240, you'd have to spend easily what I'd have in an AWD conversion in transmission/differential/axle rebuild to handle that kind of traction.
3. We're talking about a LIGHT car. Probably a 2700 lb car with AWD (perhaps less if lightweight mods are done), compared to the about 3400 lb Skyline. 700 lb less would have a MASSIVE impact on performance. If it's true what they say that "10% less weight is equivalent to 10% more power", then we're looking at a car that's 20% LIGHTER. Theoretically that means I'd get the same performance if I was cranking 20% less power, i.e. at 400 crank hp it'd perform like a 500 crank hp Skyline. Obviously, that equation is not going to work that perfectly in practice, but it's probably not too terribly far off. Case in point, I don't have to make quite as massive amounts of power to be quick.
I'M NOT saying this to flame anyone; a few years ago I probably would have agreed with you, but now I have to say:Have you ever ridden in a built 2-Liter Inline 4 AWD car?Trust me when I say you can make MORE then enough power for a street car with an I4. You could make 500-600 crank horsepower on the SR20 with PUMP GAS and a relatively mild bottom end rebuild (lots of supporting mods tho); 800-1200 would be attainable with a serious rebuild and race gas (I have no intention of making this a drag-only car; and yet, if I did, it still wouldn't cost what a complete performance rebuild would cost on an RB series engine).
I have personally seen/ridden in a 500 crank HP 2 Liter I4 AWD car [DSM]; with a cheap 3-year-old set of 225 pep-boy tires and stock rims that thing would pull the front tires off the ground as high as a pop bottle off the line. In fact, it even pulled the front tires off the ground on the 1/2 shift [no exaggeration].
Again, an I4 can make PLEANTY enough power AND TORQUE for the quickest street car you'd want to drive - and it does it at a fraction of the cost (albeit at slightly less reliability, yes, but then, repairs cost a fraction as much as well).
(Yes, a DSM probably has a more efficient drivetrain then an RB26, but it shouldn't be a MASSIVE difference).
Now you all know why I'm trying to use an SR20 instead of an RB25/26.--------------Sorry for the long posts, and thanks again for the replies - they have been very helpful!