I could sit here all day and argue till I'm blue in the face but the facts don't lie...I was talking to a friend the other day and he didn't believe that an RB26 has seen over 900 WHP on a completely stock long block until he found it for himself today, found out the RB26 had ran numerous 7 second passes. The most power I've seen out of an RB20 with a stock bottom end was 533 WHP out of a completely stock RB20.Cjmartz2k wrote:I'm not trying to sound like a d*** Krazykouki, but I couldn't disagree with you more. No way in hell it would be half as cheap to make a RB20 make the same power (500hp) a SR would. Also, you don't like your RB25, especially compared to your RB20? That just baffles me.
Krazy is just upset that his 25 sucks. He is still mad my 25 beat his when I had 4 pistons with broken ring lands.Cjmartz2k wrote:I'm not trying to sound like a d*** Krazykouki, but I couldn't disagree with you more. No way in hell it would be half as cheap to make a RB20 make the same power (500hp) a SR would. Also, you don't like your RB25, especially compared to your RB20? That just baffles me.
Jimefam wrote:Krazy is just upset that his 25 sucks. He is still mad my 25 beat his when I had 4 pistons with broken ring lands.Cjmartz2k wrote:I'm not trying to sound like a d*** Krazykouki, but I couldn't disagree with you more. No way in hell it would be half as cheap to make a RB20 make the same power (500hp) a SR would. Also, you don't like your RB25, especially compared to your RB20? That just baffles me.
Are you seriously going to use that kind of reasoning? I'm in a really good mood today so I'm going to step out of this thread with out being an a**. I think the OP understands my points and can choose to listen to who he wants.danielmcn wrote:I really dont see how you can say the sr20 is any better at making power then the rb20. Fack is the rb20 would be better. Think about this, at 400hp on the sr20 you need to make 100hp per cyl. On an rb20 with the same power its 66.6666666666666, thats 33% less per. If you use more pistons and rods to do the same work t makes the job less stressfull on the moving parts.
Cjmartz2k wrote:IIRC Rb25's weigh the same as RB20's. The might even be a little lighter since there is more missing from the block due to bigger bores![]()
Are you seriously going to use that kind of reasoning? I'm in a really good mood today so I'm going to step out of this thread with out being an a**. I think the OP understands my points and can choose to listen to who he wants.danielmcn wrote:I really dont see how you can say the sr20 is any better at making power then the rb20. Fack is the rb20 would be better. Think about this, at 400hp on the sr20 you need to make 100hp per cyl. On an rb20 with the same power its 66.6666666666666, thats 33% less per. If you use more pistons and rods to do the same work t makes the job less stressfull on the moving parts.
One last thing, I also have owned all 3 motors. RB20 would be my last choice of motor for every kind of motor sport. The only way I would play with one is if it was already installed in the car and I was on a budget. Both of which were true for me at the time.
Cjmartz2k wrote:4 or 6 banger has nothing to do with it. That logic is flawed. How about a 4G63? Would you rather have an RB20 over one of those and try to make tons of power? Research how much people make on them. The RB20 is hard to make a lot of power with. The head flows like crap. It's also expensive for parts. The SR is cheaper and will make 500rwhp+ all day long, as MANY people have proven that. Maybe there is a person or two out there with a 500rwhp+ RB20, but I haven't seen it, and it sure isn't common.
Okay, 500hp divided by 6 is less than divided by 4. How about the fact you need to run more boost or a bigger turbo or rev the RB20 higher to make the same power? Well, now your math doesn't add up. I'm speaking from experience, not what I learned in 4th grade math.