Post by
[email protected] »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/jai-revolutionbrake-com-u82885.html
Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:26 am
First, master cylinder basics considering a given amount of effort at the brake pedal; the bigger the cylinder bore, the GREATER the volume delivered and the LOWER the pressure. The smaller the master cylinder bore, the LOWER the volume delivered and the GREATER the system PRESSURE. After the pistons have moved the pads into contact with the rotors (consuming the required volume), the pressure is what does the work. The brake pedal is a lever which increases the driver’s mechanical advantage over the hydraulic system. The greater the pedal ratio the greater the advantage (or leverage) and so the driver is able to apply more force to the master cylinder. This force, via the master cylinder, has a direct relationship to hydraulic system pressure. In addition to this, the booster adds assistance. The booster does not compound the pressure, it just adds. It’s kind of like having the passenger lean over and help with his foot on top of the driver’s (in a manual / non booster system). The effect of the booster has to do with it’s diameter and the engine’s ability to provide vacuum (for the sake of explanation as we all know that vacuum is just a reduction in atmospheric pressure). So, really, we need to factor in the pedal ratio and the boost effect from the booster to have an accurate assessment of the upgrade / downgrade / change. Do both cars produce the same manifold vacuum? And in what state of tune? The more radical the cam shaft the less vacuum generally available to the booster, another factor to consider in the calculation. If someone has the time to take the measurements or otherwise find the data, I can hand it off to an engineer here to do the calculations. In the absence of these data, we can’t really make a good comparison of brake performance, one car to another.
Lets look at brake bias and the need to imagine that Nissan knew what they were doing in the first place (just kidding, I’m a Nissan fan and drive a 300ZX). No one has mentioned making any changes to the rear brakes. If you increase the master cylinder bore size, one of the side effects is a reduction in pressure. Without changes to the rear, the rear brakes will be less effective (for a given system pressure) with this bigger cylinder. This does not maintain the Nissan bias either. So if one thinks one is improving the front end with the big master cylinder (which is not our point of view) while degrading the rear, Nissan’s bias is really out the window.
From a brake upgrade provider’s point of view (which we are) it is always better to match the calipers to the vehicle hydraulic system. In the case of 300ZX calipers on a 240, the factory master cylinder is well within range and requires minimal effort for the installer (no modifications to important components). Also, the rear brake system is still as effective as it was and not degraded by reducing pressure with a bigger cylinder. Because the installer probably doesn’t know the difference in pedal ratios or booster sizes, it’s a better bet to look directly at the effects of the “upgraded” calipers on the existing vehicle system and see if that picture is appealing. We think it is.
BTW, the 300 calipers in question are about 10% bigger (in piston area) than those on the 240, the increase in volume requirement is 10%, the increase in pedal travel is therefore 10% (not considering system flex). From a driver’s point of view, 10% more pedal travel is not that noticeable, but a 10% reduction in pedal effort for a give brake effect is very noticeable. We’d recommend replacing the factory rubber type flex hoses with stainless steel braided hoses too.