Your's don't really fit though, no offence. They stick out a lot, and if you were any lower they would ram straight into the fenders under compression. With more camber and 245s they could be pulled off better.KA-Te wrote:I have 18X10 +30 on the rear of my s13 w/ stock suspension.
Tires are 255/45/18
They fit fine... I rolled the fenders slightly since the tires were rubbing a little bit.
I got right ones 17s, but almost got 245/40 17, but went with 235/40 17. 245 would have been little too big. NICO wheel/tire forum helped me a lot.~4N~ wrote:Everyone who is new to 240's always wants to get 18" wheels at first, and the people who actually do get them end up regretting it later on.
d!ck wrote:so u wanna b a baller?
Yes, so we can stop hearing the beeeching.94_240sx wrote:^^ Give him previlege...
Word, I'll take the honors as well.naed240sx wrote:Can a mod start moving these threads to Wheels/Tires/Suspension or give me mod priveledges so that I can do so?
I see soooo many wheel and suspension questions asked in 240sx general.
LMGT4s look nice on any car. Sometimes LMGT4s+tires will cost way more than actual car though...whiterps13 wrote:Seriously, you cant hate on this car.
Thats the only negative I can think of.babowc wrote:not to mention the crazy tire prices.
I agree. But, theyre 18's so 99% of NICOnauts will call them rice or overkill. I feel like Im preaching to the choir so I'll just go retreat to my cave.94_240sx wrote:
LMGT4s look nice on any car. Sometimes LMGT4s+tires will cost way more than actual car though...
Movednaed240sx wrote:Can a mod start moving these threads to Wheels/Tires/Suspension or give me mod priveledges so that I can do so?
I see soooo many wheel and suspension questions asked in 240sx general.
Watch mewhiterps13 wrote: Seriously, you cant hate on this car.
Thanks!Rex wrote:Moved
Wait... what?amolao wrote:the car was engineered to roll on 16 inch tires.
I HATE YOU.naed240sx wrote:
Watch me
Sky high, uneven ride height, and totally boring.
By the way, 18s suck because you can't have wide wheels and still maintain stock or smaller rolling diameter, because thoe tire choices just aren't available. This means that you end up ****ing over your already too-high gearing, and making it impossible to have a low car without rubbing your fender tubs like mad.
ok, sorry....15'/16's depending of the year.....naed240sx wrote:Wait... what?
Wait, so that was a serious remark?amolao wrote:ok, sorry....15'/16's depending of the year.....
it was just engineered with that in mind.not saying it wont improve the quality/handling of the car by adding aftermarket parts.naed240sx wrote:
Wait, so that was a serious remark?
UGHHHH. The car was also engineered pre 1990 and marketed towards women here in the US. Your reasoning infers that from a performance point of view the car is perfect to begin with? This makes me laugh hard and want to kick you in the face.
I suppose that my coilovers are a waste of money and aren't helping the car to handle any better because it was designed with 1.9kg/mm springs in mind?
Once again, UGGHHH
Then why the hell did he mention that? He was INFERING that 15s/16s are the absolute best for performance because that is how the car was designedbabowc wrote:not saying it wont improve the quality/handling of the car by adding aftermarket parts.
So then why mention it at all? It was of no relevance to this thread.babowc wrote:the suspension set from factory was designed with the 15"/16" wheels in mind, although it may not be the ideal setting, thats what it was designed on.
Because people thinking that the car can't be improved or should be left alone because they think that it was engineered for absolute performance domination piss me off.babowc wrote:lol, why are you overreacting so much?
1. he didnt say it was the absolute best option, he said the car was ENGINEERED to roll on 15/16. he never mentioned it was the best option.2. he didnt, you did. suspension wise, that is.3. lol its you again, thinking that, noone mentioned anything about the car not being able to be improved.naed240sx wrote:
Then why the hell did he mention that? He was INFERING that 15s/16s are the absolute best for performance because that is how the car was designed
So then why mention it at all? It was of no relevance to this thread.
Because people thinking that the car can't be improved or should be left alone because they think that it was engineered for absolute performance domination piss me off.
If that's not what he was trying to say then why the **** did he even post it? It wouldn't make any sense in the context of the thread. It would be like me saying "I like to food" in the middle of this thread. Totally irrelevant comment if this is the case.babowc wrote:1. he didnt say it was the absolute best option, he said the car was ENGINEERED to roll on 15/16. he never mentioned it was the best option.2. he didnt, you did. suspension wise, that is.3. lol its you again, thinking that, noone mentioned anything about the car not being able to be improved.