Save your money and make your car run good first before you start talking about making the bore bigger. It seems everyone wants a bigger bore! My suggestion to this is to either boost your KA or go buy the famed SR. Some purchased the CA to be different, cost, or it's ability to rev whilst knowing that it has a smaller displacement than it's cheaper counterparts. Just accept you have a small engine and make something out of what you got. I guess it would be like having an extremely small pecker, those were the cards you have been dealt, so play the hand .silvia_ca18det wrote:so i am sitting here looking at my dissasembled block and i am thinking "**** those are thin cylinder walls" i was planing og going .40 over, basiclly i am asking is it safe to go .40 over and be running 20 psi of boost? anyone else gone .40 over on their block? any little advise would be awsome
thanks
ahhahaha i love that post there.boost_boy wrote:Save your money and make your car run good first before you start talking about making the bore bigger. It seems everyone wants a bigger bore! My suggestion to this is to either boost your KA or go buy the famed SR. Some purchased the CA to be different, cost, or it's ability to rev whilst knowing that it has a smaller displacement than it's cheaper counterparts. Just accept you have a msall engine and make something out of what you got. I guess it would be like having an extremely small pecker, those were the cards you have been dealt, so play the hand .
Dee
...or some choose it because it was what came in their carboost_boy wrote: Some purchased the CA to be different, cost, or it's ability to rev whilst knowing that it has a smaller displacement than it's cheaper counterparts. Just accept you have a small engine and make something out of what you got. I guess it would be like having an extremely small pecker, those were the cards you have been dealt, so play the hand .
Dee
Exactly!mikesim wrote:what does .040 overbore yeild in displacement anyway? 1.9L? is the small gain in torque worth the loss of rev-range?
i'd agree with the others here, stick to standard bore.
My agreeance is that the small gain in torque is probably not worth the money unless you got a free set of pistons. You may as well go for a stroker kit which woll allow you to enjoy that .040 overbore. The revving stuff I opt to not get into.CA19DET wrote:
please explain?? the bore doesnt change rod ratio drastically or anything, how does it effect rev range?? if anything it would increase torque as displacement increased (minimally of course)
You'll gain your extra torque by installing said components and doing some boring. Go for it............tyrannix wrote:speaking of overbore, im getting a nismo full counterweighted crank, it has a longer stroke, i was going to bore out to keep the bore+stroke square (i have to use custom rods, and get forged pistons anyway, so no reason not to in my mind)
so theoretically, i should still be revving the same, but have the little extra torque also? (like a frankenstein stroker kit)
my car has ran good from day one i have had it to 300PS all year long! no problems no nothing! i am looking for more power though, and i have a silvia, i have also had an sr20, and an rb20, rb25, and rb26, i have used all the motors except for build up a CA, and money is no issue aswell! just looking at the best way to do this efficently!boost_boy wrote:Save your money and make your car run good first before you start talking about making the bore bigger. It seems everyone wants a bigger bore! My suggestion to this is to either boost your KA or go buy the famed SR. Some purchased the CA to be different, cost, or it's ability to rev whilst knowing that it has a smaller displacement than it's cheaper counterparts. Just accept you have a small engine and make something out of what you got. I guess it would be like having an extremely small pecker, those were the cards you have been dealt, so play the hand . Dee