Oh Man.. are you wanting to start a fight??duff0000 wrote:Will a built KA motor make more power then a built sr20det motor?
there's a guy on the lookoutdrift forum that did his 240 all race setup. srtipped down, roll caged and everything.duff0000 wrote:Hey guys, Im new to 240sx's and am wondering about building one up. I come from honda's, Ive got a s2000 and instead of supercharging it, Im thinking about gettin a 240 and building it up. Im looking into the early 90's hatchbacks. Heres a couple of questions I have:
Ive heard its a good idea to get the 90 1/2 year ones and up because its a lot less work to swap a sr20det into them? is this true? why?
Will a built KA motor make more power then a built sr20det motor?
Can I aquire a stock 240 with high miles (140k +) for less then $1000? Ive seen alot of them lately go for under 1g.
Whats the best year 240 to make into a race car(stripped interior,no emissions, rollcage) which year is the lightest?
If theres any other good info i can use please post it here.
Thanks in advance guys, I really look forward to owning a 240!
You dare to dream the impossible dream. It cannot be done with any modicum of style, reliability, longevity, or quality.duff0000 wrote:Im basically looking to make a highway monster.. and a 12 second car in the quater would be nice too. My budget is around 5,000.
yea, there are people with reliable 400whp (and up to 600 now) KAs but not on stock internals. Ivan did make over 400whp on stock internals but that was for a couple dyno pulls and a little road time then the ring lands went. i would never trust 400whp out of a stock block KA. the ring lands on the stock KA pistons are too weak to support major power for a good time. the rest of the block is pretty sound though. i think low to mid 300's is more relistic. i do prefer the KA over the SR but each engine has its pros and cons and each should really be looked upon for what your budget and type of racing you are going to be doing. If i had 5k to put together a 240 for some fun i would find a well kept/well running 240 for a decent price and focus on suspension and some good wheels and tires first. that would be enough to have some fun on the roads as well as some autocross events while you get to know the car and it's characteristics/limits. then down the road when u have some more money saved up, look into adding some power with maybe a turbo or a swap of some sort. waiting down the road to put money into the engine will allow you time too fingure out what you are really interested in doing with the car.benemorius wrote:With a budget of $5000, you might be able to do a build, but you may consider leaving the internals alone. If you come from the Honda world and are new to the KA scene, it may be news to you that a stock KA is actually very strong. As somebody already mentioned - many people are pushing 400 hp with no reliability issues to date.
Excellent commentary.TurboKA37 wrote:yea, there are people with reliable 400whp (and up to 600 now) KAs but not on stock internals. Ivan did make over 400whp on stock internals but that was for a couple dyno pulls and a little road time then the ring lands went. i would never trust 400whp out of a stock block KA. the ring lands on the stock KA pistons are too weak to support major power for a good time. the rest of the block is pretty sound though. i think low to mid 300's is more relistic. i do prefer the KA over the SR but each engine has its pros and cons and each should really be looked upon for what your budget and type of racing you are going to be doing. If i had 5k to put together a 240 for some fun i would find a well kept/well running 240 for a decent price and focus on suspension and some good wheels and tires first. that would be enough to have some fun on the roads as well as some autocross events while you get to know the car and it's characteristics/limits. then down the road when u have some more money saved up, look into adding some power with maybe a turbo or a swap of some sort. waiting down the road to put money into the engine will allow you time too fingure out what you are really interested in doing with the car.
Same.TurboKA37 wrote:thanks, i try to let people know how i would have done things if i had to start all over
Well, that and a camshaft .Florida240sx wrote:Only thing different from 89-90 to 91-93 is front bumper.
Well, was under the assumption of him wanting an SR, so didn't matter which one he has because he was going to trash the engine. Turbo kits are to find for SOHC or am I blind? Good job on quoting that though to prevent maybe others thinking that's the only thing different.....nametakennow wrote:
Well, that and a camshaft .
89-90 = SOHC 2.4litre91+ = DOHC 2.4litre