themadscientist wrote:over six liters and four turbos and just 1000hp, eh. When people squeeze that power out of sub-3-liter engines and two or one turbo it makes this one unimpressive.
i beg to differ,
have you ever ridden in a 1000hp supra?
probably not, and that is the reason for your statment
a small displacment engine, such as a rb26 or even the larger 2jz, are laggy, granted with anti-lag and other driving amenities, the lag can be elimanated, but this does not lead to long and healthy turbin lifes'
small dispacment engine with high horsepower numbers get smaller power bands, which are fun for a while, but with weak torque curves they just are not that fun to drive
my friend has a 1992 fox body, with a 331 stroker, and a 70mm turbo(i believe) anyways he makes 745rwtq on pump gass at 2900rpms, and just over 820hp by 6500rpms, his car is a blast to drive, the car has never even seen race gass in it
on the other hand i have a friend who has a supra(stock engine) with a to4r and a bit of juice and he made 989rwhp on race gass, and granted on the highway the supra pulls from the mustang, but in overall fun the mustang wins hands down, just becasue he has a fun responsive power band
just like this 12cyl beast, i am quite sure he can do that 1000hp on pump gass, and it is probably a blast to drive through the mountains becasue of its smooth instant power
not sure what i'm getting at, besides the fact that his car with 1000hp is probably alot more fun to drive then most 1000hp sub 3L cars
anyways my $.02