Q active Question

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
louiegz
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 6:17 am
Car: 2003 BMW 330i, 2007 Audi A3 3.2 Quattro

Post

I'm sure this has been asked, but what are the main diferences between the active suspension of the G50 Q and the active damping of the current Q? I've noticed for 05, it will be offered standard on all Qs.


Q45tech
Moderator
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 3:19 am
Car: 1990 Q45 342,400 miles 22 years ownership with original engine
1995 G20t 5 speed 334,000 miles 16" 2002 wheels - 205/50/16 Sr20ve vvl

Post

Dynamically changing the stiffness of a shock absorber vs actually maintaining the car body level. The early active system actually changed the effective spring rate on each corner simultaneously and provided ~~300-400 pounds per corner of lift.....roughly 30% of body weight was supported via active system all the time!

User avatar
elwesso
Posts: 30810
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Car: 94 Infiniti Q45t 5 spd
2007 BMW M Coupe
2007 Infiniti G35 S 6MT
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Post

Dennis, so are you saying this new thing isnt as effective as the new setup??

It seems that if infiniti offered their old setup (it can be the original setup with all the same main parts), they would compete much better.....

1992Q45A
Posts: 1183
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 4:59 am

Post

Of course it isn't

Active damping has been around for ever. Selective damping has been around for ever to

It's just a chinsy way to say you have an advanced suspension

fxjackso
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 3:17 am

Post

The new Cadillac has active shocks. The BMW has active sway bars. But only the Q45a, the Mercedes ABC, and the Citroen Zantia have real pump pressure driven active suspensions.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

And the Infiniti system likely wont leave you stranded.

texasoil
Posts: 875
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 3:18 pm
Car: '92 Infiniti Q45A
'94 Infiniti Q45A
'94 Mercedes-Benz SL600

Post

A number of mfg's have offered versions of variable stiffness shocks over the years. This is TOTALLY DIFFERENT than true 'active suspension' like the Q45a has. ACTIVE SUSPENSION (actually semi active since it still uses conventional springs for 60% of the curb weight support) utilizes stored high pressure oil to force the wheels down into holes, adds pressure to the outside wheels when cornering,etc. Adjustable dampening can emulate a lot of the Q45a feel without the weight and mechanical complexity of hydraulics, and can even improve on some areas like high frequency response (short bumps) The difficulty with adjustable dampeing is the lack of enough energy to drive the wheels down into a hole. Thus the car body will drop considerably more tha a Q45a type system. If the road presents 'bumps' more than 'holes' or droops, then adjustable shocks can/may do a good job. Its a compromise system--lighter weight, lower power consumption, but lower benefits too.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

I'm looking forward to when delphi magneride technology will be available on non-GM vehicles.

IvoryJ30t
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:36 pm
Car: 95 Maxima GLE, 95 Maxima GXE

Post

i noticed the mercedes ABC had a very high failure rate.

when i was towing for mercedes, i would pick up new S430's and S500's with malfuntioning ABC systems all the time.

its a pain in the *** to get a big mercedes that is practically touching the ground up on a flat bed. took many 2x4's.

one of the failed S430's i picked up was black on black with black tints and 18" giovanni wheels. the extreme drop caused by the ABC failure made the car look awesome. too bad you arent going anywhere with the frame dragging on the ground.

User avatar
rover3l
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:22 am
Car: 1998 Q45, 2000Q45 Anniversary, 1965 Rover 3L,

Post

isn't the case that the Q45a also reduces the pressure of stut over a raise bump as well as forcing the strut down into a depression or hole type of bump.

User avatar
rover3l
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:22 am
Car: 1998 Q45, 2000Q45 Anniversary, 1965 Rover 3L,

Post

related to this I don't understand why replacing the 4 strut accumulators provides 90% of the ride quality whereas the very complex additional 5 only adds a further 10% improvement. Does the active effect actually operate with replacing only the strut accumulators?

texasoil
Posts: 875
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 3:18 pm
Car: '92 Infiniti Q45A
'94 Infiniti Q45A
'94 Mercedes-Benz SL600

Post

Replacing only the strut accumulators gets you perhaps 70% of the bump absorbtion and hole following(smooth ride). It does not give you any more 'active' than the main accumulators have capacity left (usually not much if any) , The Pump DOES provide some active on long duration events--like sweeping turns or hard braking.

User avatar
rover3l
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:22 am
Car: 1998 Q45, 2000Q45 Anniversary, 1965 Rover 3L,

Post

so with the fully active working should I see a difference over pot holes and raised bumps.

I still have this unresolved knocking sound over multiple medium size bumps like you get on a crudely patched road. I do not see any leakage of silicone fluid from the subframe mounts and the suspension bushings seem in good shape. All the piping and exhaust etc seem solidly fixed so I am suspecting water hammer noise. Do you have experience of what this sounds like and does it occur on an active if not fully recharged. Note it was there prior to the replacement of the strut accumulators and is still there afterwards.

The only other thing I can think of is the strut mounts themselves at the top. Can these be accessed from within the trunk?

texasoil
Posts: 875
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 3:18 pm
Car: '92 Infiniti Q45A
'94 Infiniti Q45A
'94 Mercedes-Benz SL600

Post

You can get 'water hammer' noise resonating through the oil piping if the valve accumulators are flat, or if there is gas trapped in the piping. Also check exhaust hangers carefully. Rear muffler is heavy and WILL bang against body if not properly secured in place.

User avatar
rover3l
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:22 am
Car: 1998 Q45, 2000Q45 Anniversary, 1965 Rover 3L,

Post

Checked the exhaust and it is rock solid. Changed the sway bar bushings and as far as I can checked the subframe mounts (no sign of fluid leaking). Noise is still present but strangly not over large bumps. It only seems to occur on a certain pattern of bumps. Typically a series of medium size bumps and it sounds like something hitting the underside on the drivers side rear. There is nothing to be felt but just the noise. At first I thought it was the spare wheel cover or the jack rattling around but I removed everything from the trunk and no improvement.

Other than reading about water hammer noise I have no idea what this actually sounds like in an active Q


Return to “General Chat”