Post by
RED_DET »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/red-det-u7295.html
Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:12 am
Read:
Okay here's a long overdue couple of dynographs that were referenced in the second article in the magazine but didn't make it in but before that allow me to refresh people about the MAHA 3000 LPS dyno:
For those unfamiliar with dynamometers, there are two basic types of dyno's:
The first being the Engine Stand dyno, which requires bolting a complete engine to a horizontal engine stand and measuring how much resistance it can overcome or how much work (measured in torque or horsepower) it can produce. While this is the most exact measurement possible, it means removing the engine from the vehicle and after testing, reinstalling it again. Obviously the downtime and expense do not make this a practical option for most owners. The advantages are the engine is being tested in a controlled environment and there are no driveline loses to compensate for in calculating the engines output. However, for development work where many options are to be tested before the engine goes into the vehicle, it can be an invaluable tool.
The second type of dyno is a chassis dyno, which merely requires driving the vehicle onto the rollers and strapping the vehicle down, so it doesn't run off the dyno, and then measuring the amount of resistance/work it can overcome.
There are 2 main obstacles when using a chassis dyno, the first is airflow. Most fans used on chassis dynamometers are taken from contractor suppliers and struggle to simulate a 10-20 MPH road speed, which is equivalent to your doctor asking you to submit to a fitness test while in a sauna. Needless to say, your score will be low. The MAHA approved custom built, "AIR 8" fan on the AMS MAHA dyno, flows over 80,000 CFM (cubic feet/minute) or a road speed of 60-70mph!
The second obstacle, is that most dyno's only measure "wheel horsepower" - that is the power that isn't sapped away by everything located after the clutch (transmission, differentials, driveshaft, axles, even the wheels and tires themselves!). And since wheelhorsepower readings are dependent on the temperature of your transmission and differential oils (cold oil is like molasses and warm is like water, warm oil eats less power) and tire temperature (cold tires offer less resistance than warm sticky tires) so driveline loss can be inconsistent or as an expert referred to it "a moving target"!
Many people simply add back a "guesstimate" of the parasitic drag of these components anywhere from 10-20% for FWD or RWD cars and 25-40% for AWD or 4WD cars. The final flywheel numbers are only as accurate as the tuner's best guess.
The inherent beauty of a dyno system like the MAHA LPS 3000, is that after it has measured the wheel horsepower, it measures the resistance of the entire drive train from the clutch to the tires by letting the car "coast" down while in gear, so instead of dynoing a vehicle with a reported 200 horsepower and measuring only 150HP at the wheel, and assuming that 50hp was eaten up by the drag of the drive train and wheels The LPS 3000 actually measures the drag loss during the coast down phase. In fact, if the drag loss is only 30hp , you know beyond a "guesstimate" that your engine only made 180hp, or if the drag was 50hp, you will know exactly how much power your vehicle is really making. However, with a drag measurement you can rest assured that you have isolated only the engine's horsepower and not the engine's power minus an unknown amount of drag. The system also corrects for environmental conditions such as humidity, air density, and temperature.
I didn't write the article.
But from what I gather, that particular dyno can simulate normal driving conditions which would yield a more accurate hp reading, although it maybe lower.