http://www.engadget.com/2008/0...board/MinisterofDOOM wrote:Any links? I can find plenty of info on the Netflix partnership but nothing on the new dashboard upgrades aside from a totally useless ad video.
Video I saw said it'll be seamless active battle like 12, but done in a different way.krimsonviper wrote:does anyone know how the new final fantasy is going to play? like is it going to be turn based, or is it going to be mmo-like still? hope not, the graphics look stellar
hmm.. off the top of my head.. Killzone 2? Resistance 1&2? DC Universe Online (which is looking AWESOME)? InFamous? M.A.G. (which looks like Socom with 256 players)? Street Fighter 4? Gran Turismo 5? Ferrari Challenge? ..not to mention all the good games that are already on shelves, ie MGS4, Uncharted, Warhawk, Unreal 3, etc..MinisterofDOOM wrote:Little Big Planet and GoW3 are the two PS3 games that have me thinking "damn...I wish there were more good PS3 games so I could justify a PS3 for these."
Killzone sucked. Resistance doesn't interest me. I HATE comic book games. Infamous looks excellent. MAG I have no idea about. Street Fighter 4 excites me about as much as being castrated. GT5 same thing...I have a car I don't need racing games. Ferrari Challenge same thing. Warhawk is online only so FAIL. Unreal Tournament 3 (not Unreal 3) I can get for the PC or the 360.s13jus10 wrote:
hmm.. off the top of my head.. Killzone 2? Resistance 1&2? DC Universe Online (which is looking AWESOME)? InFamous? M.A.G. (which looks like Socom with 256 players)? Street Fighter 4? Gran Turismo 5? Ferrari Challenge? ..not to mention all the good games that are already on shelves, ie MGS4, Uncharted, Warhawk, Unreal 3, etc..
They might be IF I had the money to drop on ANOTHER multihundreddollar game system. But I don't. I'd rather get an HDTV so I can fully enjoy my 360 games first.hatchback240 wrote:mgs4, little big planet, and GoW3 should easily be justification for owning a ps3. but hey, to each their own
I don't think the 360 is better. The 360 has MORE GAMES I LIKE that are OUT NOW and not waiting, or in development, or being delayed, or whatever. Yeah, in a year or two the PS3 will probably have a nice library of games I'd like to play. So...why would I buy one now? YOU can think the PS3 isn't lacking great games all you want. I beg to differ. But I'm not attacking the PS3 or claiming the 360 is better. All I'm saying is I have other things to do with my $300+.AZ89two4Tsx wrote:I don't get why people still think the 360 is any better that the ps3. And really, is the game selection and online features provided for ps3 really that bad? I admit it isn't quite as good, but the ps3 really isn't lacking that many great games.
That old OLD argument has LONG been proven crap.Microsoft did not hastily jump in. They just jumped in first. Tell me what they wer hasty about? Tell me where that cost them?And The PS3 has been out for a year and a half now. BY FAR long enough to have "caught up with" the 360.hatchback240 wrote:^ werd. microsoft hastily jumped into the next gen in a mad dash to beat sony instead of taking their time. as was mentioned in the sony conference, sony aimed to release yet another 10 year system, and the fruits of their labor are starting to show. its easy to brag about a larger game selection and higher sell count when you have a year and a half head start, but as far as longevity of each system, sony is sticking it to the man
Exactly.hatchback240 wrote:because then its just a pissing contest. to each their own, eh?
MinisterofDOOM wrote:
Killzone sucked. Resistance doesn't interest me. I HATE comic book games. Infamous looks excellent. MAG I have no idea about. Street Fighter 4 excites me about as much as being castrated. GT5 same thing...I have a car I don't need racing games. Ferrari Challenge same thing. Warhawk is online only so FAIL. Unreal Tournament 3 (not Unreal 3) I can get for the PC or the 360.
They might be IF I had the money to drop on ANOTHER multihundreddollar game system. But I don't. I'd rather get an HDTV so I can fully enjoy my 360 games first.
I don't think the 360 is better. The 360 has MORE GAMES I LIKE that are OUT NOW and not waiting, or in development, or being delayed, or whatever. Yeah, in a year or two the PS3 will probably have a nice library of games I'd like to play. So...why would I buy one now? YOU can think the PS3 isn't lacking great games all you want. I beg to differ. But I'm not attacking the PS3 or claiming the 360 is better. All I'm saying is I have other things to do with my $300+.
That old OLD argument has LONG been proven crap.Microsoft did not hastily jump in. They just jumped in first. Tell me what they wer hasty about? Tell me where that cost them?And The PS3 has been out for a year and a half now. BY FAR long enough to have "caught up with" the 360.
I don't see Sony sticking it to ANYONE, except the poor saps trying to release simultaneous multiplatform versions. And I think it's a TEENY bit early to start talking about system longevity when it's been out for a year and a half.
Also, I don't WANT another "10 year system." I haven't had a PS2 for years.
so you don't like war/sci-fi shooters.. don't like comics/superheroes.. don't like fighters.. don't like racers.. don't like online gameplay.. and don't like the ability to mod your games.MinisterofDOOM wrote:Killzone sucked. Resistance doesn't interest me. I HATE comic book games. Infamous looks excellent. MAG I have no idea about. Street Fighter 4 excites me about as much as being castrated. GT5 same thing...I have a car I don't need racing games. Ferrari Challenge same thing. Warhawk is online only so FAIL. Unreal Tournament 3 (not Unreal 3) I can get for the PC or the 360.
well a PS3 isn't as deep as an "investment" than a 360 is in the long run, but I'm gonna have to agree with you... get an HDTV firstMinisterofDOOM wrote:They might be IF I had the money to drop on ANOTHER multihundreddollar game system. But I don't. I'd rather get an HDTV so I can fully enjoy my 360 games first.
uhhh.. RROD? poor hardware design? failure rates through the roof? scratching discs? all could have easily been prevented had Microsoft taken their time in designing their new box properly. it's definitely costing them.. but hey, they're Microsoft.. they can afford it. and we as consumers apparently don't seem to mind going through countless return cycles for our xboxes, so Microsoft is saying "oh what the hell.. let's not fix the problems with it."MinisterofDOOM wrote:That old OLD argument has LONG been proven crap.Microsoft did not hastily jump in. They just jumped in first. Tell me what they wer hasty about? Tell me where that cost them?And The PS3 has been out for a year and a half now. BY FAR long enough to have "caught up with" the 360.
That's not what I said at all. See this is why I can't stand console debates. I say one thing, and people read something ENTIRELY different into it. Allow me to elaborate:s13jus10 wrote:so you don't like war/sci-fi shooters.. don't like comics/superheroes.. don't like fighters.. don't like racers.. don't like online gameplay.. and don't like the ability to mod your games.
None of that has anything at all to do with MS being first to the market this round. It's just bad design. Would have happened if MS had been a year LATER than the PS3, too. And you're exactly right, and prove my point: MS DOESN'T care to fix it. THAT'S why it's a problem. Not because it was first to market. You'd think after 3 (or is it 4) redesigns, the problem would be gone if it was just a matter of rushed development, wouldn't you?s13jus10 wrote:uhhh.. RROD? poor hardware design? failure rates through the roof? scratching discs? all could have easily been prevented had Microsoft taken their time in designing their new box properly. it's definitely costing them.. but hey, they're Microsoft.. they can afford it. and we as consumers apparently don't seem to mind going through countless return cycles for our xboxes, so Microsoft is saying "oh what the hell.. let's not fix the problems with it."