Thanks. The recommended tread depth to change at with snow is 6/32, which I thought was what I had at the beginning of the month when I was in for service. Come to find out I really had 2/32. That definitely went into the customer satisfaction survey that comes in the mail.SVTCOBRA wrote:Good job making it there safely!! (I normally replace my tires at 4/32 and they are normally the rears with better on the front).
Oh believe me, I had issues with city driving as well before storing the G. There was a day where it took me 40 minutes to get out of a parking lot because it was on a steep hill. There was also another day that I got stuck in an intersection after getting 8" due to the crud (had to back up and turn right instead of left was how I got out). There was also a time when I was following someone going really slow in bad conditions and there was a long hill coming up and I figured there was no way I was going to be able to make it up behind this guy since he wasn't going fast enough, so I had to turn off and find my way through a residential area. But at my parents house where the G is hibernating, the driveway and the road are all up hill where cars have been known to get stuck after a storm. When I went to wash it before leaving, that day we had about 6" and the guy who plows the road hadn't come yet (for a about 100 feet, I was the plow), but I made it up just fine surprisingly.BrandAidDesignG35 wrote:
I don't know how you did it... I can barely make it up the small hill past my house if there is any snow... and I have at least 8/32 tread left on Bridgestone turenza's I think... They are all seasons.
I think the real problem in the winter is the dead stop.... I had to crawl up a hill doing 1mph with traffic backing up behind me. I think with the momentum of 50mph, your car is stable, safe, and well balanced.
I completely agree with you. 2/32 is not safe, but with someone who knows how to pay attention and not be stupid (such as yourself), you are clearly a better driver than most people with SUVs and/or better tiressmockers83 wrote:^ Yes, that's true about the AS tires and summer tires, but the majority of vehicles on the roads today have AS tires. However, 2/32 tread is the legal minimum and not safe at all, especially in snowy conditions. In these types of conditions and that amount of tread, you're essentially running with a bald tire. But I wasn't trying emphasize the tire, just how to be smart while driving.
So what you're saying is if you cut him off or made a sudden movement that caused him to crash into you, you'd slap the **** out of him because he had bad tires on when it was clearly you're fault that caused the accident?You sound like 75% of the American population who fails to take responsibility for their own actions.But if you're the one who cut him off or made a sudden movement, don't blame the crash on his tires when it was you who clearly made the bad decision. Had you not made the sudden change there would be no need for him to dodge you.pits200 wrote:No offense, but after that long article only one thing came to my mind.
STUPID.
Nothing, I mean nothing can account for overly worn tires.
Acting like there is a science to eliminating/reducing slipping/sliding in snow and then applying this logic to a light rear ended RWD car like the G with close to bald tires.Do you forget about the other drivers on the road who might do the following.
A.) Cut you off without paying attention causing you to brake rapidly with crappy tires.
B.) They themselves can lose control causing you to need to make a reaction that your car is not capable of doing.
Honestly, if you were involved in an accident with me by driving your car the way it was, I would get out, look at your car and see your bald tires and proceed to ***** slap you till you apologized.
Not only were you putting your life at risk, you were risking all the other people's on the road also.
Just because you might be drunk and can drive home fine that night. It doesn't mean it's a perfectly fine idea because nothing happened the one time.
completely agree.ldstang50 wrote:So what you're saying is if you cut him off or made a sudden movement that caused him to crash into you, you'd slap the **** out of him because he had bad tires on when it was clearly you're fault that caused the accident?You sound like 75% of the American population who fails to take responsibility for their own actions.But if you're the one who cut him off or made a sudden movement, don't blame the crash on his tires when it was you who clearly made the bad decision. Had you not made the sudden change there would be no need for him to dodge you.
Um, when in my post did I say it was me cutting him off. The principle of the matter is that regardless of his "snow driving skills" his car is not up to par for snow driving.ldstang50 wrote:So what you're saying is if you cut him off or made a sudden movement that caused him to crash into you, you'd slap the **** out of him because he had bad tires on when it was clearly you're fault that caused the accident?You sound like 75% of the American population who fails to take responsibility for their own actions.But if you're the one who cut him off or made a sudden movement, don't blame the crash on his tires when it was you who clearly made the bad decision. Had you not made the sudden change there would be no need for him to dodge you.
Modified by ldstang50 at 8:26 AM 1/2/2009
I think you missing the point. Smockey did nothing wrong. He had all season tires and the thread wear was within the ligal limit.pits200 wrote:
Um, when in my post did I say it was me cutting him off. The principle of the matter is that regardless of his "snow driving skills" his car is not up to par for snow driving.
Second, why are you stereotyping americans with your pointless "75%" comment. So you feel he is being a responsible american by driving through the snowbelt in a car in the condition that it is.
So my final saying is this. His initial decision to drive was very irresponsible regardless of how much he attempted to control the variables.
You, along with someone else in this thread, are emphasizing what I was not trying to emphasize. I was very well aware of the risk I was taking and drove accordingly which meant I drove safely and very smart. I guess I should have added another section in that you anticipate every move further down the road than one normally does (or even at all for a lot of drivers). I gave myself plenty of room behind all vehicles and did not approach speeds that would not allow me to stop safely. You make it sound like I drove through a blizzard. I have driven through two of those might I add, and not just to go into town, but across a state.pits200 wrote:No offense, but after that long article only one thing came to my mind.
STUPID.
Nothing, I mean nothing can account for overly worn tires.
Acting like there is a science to eliminating/reducing slipping/sliding in snow and then applying this logic to a light rear ended RWD car like the G with close to bald tires.
Do you forget about the other drivers on the road who might do the following.
A.) Cut you off without paying attention causing you to brake rapidly with crappy tires.
B.) They themselves can lose control causing you to need to make a reaction that your car is not capable of doing.
Honestly, if you were involved in an accident with me by driving your car the way it was, I would get out, look at your car and see your bald tires and proceed to ***** slap you till you apologized.
Not only were you putting your life at risk, you were risking all the other people's on the road also.
Just because you might be drunk and can drive home fine that night. It doesn't mean it's a perfectly fine idea because nothing happened the one time.
Thanks, I will be when I bring her back out in the spring. Perhaps some nice new summer ones that I can drive on next winter in PA.telcoman wrote:
I would replace your tires ASAP if I were you.
Right here.pits200 wrote:Um, when in my post did I say it was me cutting him off. The principle of the matter is that regardless of his "snow driving skills" his car is not up to par for snow driving.
pits200 wrote:Honestly, if you were involved in an accident with me by driving your car the way it was, I would get out, look at your car and see your bald tires and proceed to ***** slap you till you apologized.
My car is in great condition actually, just got out of the body shop after a mechanic backed it into another car...on dry pavement...coincidentally in your case, when I was trying to get new tires. Also, if my car coupled with my "skills" weren't up to par, I wouldn't have made it to my destination.pits200 wrote:Second, why are you stereotyping americans with your pointless "75%" comment. So you feel he is being a responsible american by driving through the snowbelt in a car in the condition that it is.
Irresponsible? No, not really. Irresponsible would have been to take my car out and drive like a lot of other people, stupidly and irresponsibly. A little risk involved? Sure, a little bit more than usual. Have you driven on a freeway after it has snowed? There's usually one lane that's plowed and if not, there's almost always a couple of lanes that are like two-tracks. You don't even know what the road conditions were like, so please, just stop.pits200 wrote:So my final saying is this. His initial decision to drive was very irresponsible regardless of how much he attempted to control the variables.
The other problem with 2/32 left on tires is that when rolling there is not enough of a groove to push water away and it is very easy to hydroplane suddenly when you least expect it. Tires on a G are expensive but an accident is much more so.smockers83 wrote:I also mentioned that 6/32 is the recommended depth to change at for snowy conditions. I was aware of that fact before I left. Also, the dealership was so kind to tell me that I had 6/32 left in the beginning of December when in fact I had 2/32, which I also already mentioned. I could have been an ignorant, unsafe driver and not checked before I left. That would have been irresponsible.
The problem I had when reading this is that you were aware of the tread depth and then drove from what you stated as a little too fast at times based on the condition of the road and you tread depth.smockers83 wrote:I also mentioned that 6/32 is the recommended depth to change at for snowy conditions. I was aware of that fact before I left. Also, the dealership was so kind to tell me that I had 6/32 left in the beginning of December when in fact I had 2/32, which I also already mentioned. I could have been an ignorant, unsafe driver and not checked before I left. That would have been irresponsible.
I did say that but it was left to be interpreted in a couple of ways. One was that it would be above the comfort zone of many drivers. The other was that if conditions suddenly changed and I felt myself closer to the limit, I backed off. When one is truly over the limit is when one loses control. I was not out there with reckless abandon. The trip under good conditions takes about 7 hours, the trip that night took me 10. Over the 450 miles, that's an average speed of 45 MPH.pfarmer wrote:The problem I had when reading this is that you were aware of the tread depth and then drove from what you stated as a little too fast at times based on the condition of the road and you tread depth.
Yeah, that's what I meant...engine speed. Sorry if I made it sound otherwise. Anyway, I was about 20 miles south of West Branch I think. Mile marker 199 actually is what road side assistance said they told the towing company.smockers83 wrote:I take it you were probably in Flint or near the Bay City/Midland area when you went in. Those were the two worst spots on my trip.
To go along with your tip on driving up a slippery hill, you don't necessarily want to maintain your speed all the time, but the engine speed is something you want to maintain and control. If the hill is steep enough and the road is slippery enough, trying to maintain your speed may mean applying to much torque at the wheels.
pits200 wrote:
Um, when in my post did I say it was me cutting him off.
How is he putting other people at risk when he is driving on LEGAL tires but YOU are the one cutting him off not paying attention???? You're the one who should be slapped.Please tell me, when are you LEGALLY allowed to change back into the lane after over taking someone?pits200 wrote:
Do you forget about the other drivers on the road who might do the following.
A.) Cut you off without paying attention causing you to brake rapidly with crappy tires.
B.) They themselves can lose control causing you to need to make a reaction that your car is not capable of doing.
Honestly, if you were involved in an accident with me by driving your car the way it was, I would get out, look at your car and see your bald tires and proceed to ***** slap you till you apologized.
Not only were you putting your life at risk, you were risking all the other people's on the road also.
Why because he's not AWD, on snow tires or on brand new tires?pits200 wrote: The principle of the matter is that regardless of his "snow driving skills" his car is not up to par for snow driving.
Why am I stereotyping? Its simple, YOU can not take responsibility for you own actions, just liked 75% of Americans. You made it very clear in your initial post on this thread. You expect everyone around you to make room for you, but yet when you are the one being wreckless and endangering other people, i.e. making sudden lane changes, its their fault because they were in the lane you wanted to be in right????You seem to be the type who will sue McDonalds because you burned yourself with a hot cup of tea even though the cup said caution, contents hot.pits200 wrote:Second, why are you stereotyping americans with your pointless "75%" comment. So you feel he is being a responsible american by driving through the snowbelt in a car in the condition that it is.
There's nothing wrong with driving slow in when its snow or icy, I know I drive slow. But its the people that drive obscenely slow and make sudden movements i.e. jabbing the brakes, quick steering inputs, etc. that are the problem. And most of them happen to be people with SUVs who think they're invincible just because they have an SUV and AWDBeancooker wrote:Good post. I do what you describe, but I still feel better driving slow when it's snowy/icy.